Skip to main content

RA Should Reinstate Jess's Work and Issue a Public Apology

325 Comments

J
jen fenzi
5 years ago

Jess de Wahls' 'Rainbow' article is an intelligent and lucid analysis of the situation, which is given added weight due to her having come originally from East Germany, so she understands the danger of a split-level society, as far as voicing opinions is concerned. Total support, Jess!

N
Nigel Thorne
5 years ago

Extraordinary that you refuse to stock someone's work because they expressed a belief that humans cannot change sex. Since when did the Royal Academy start believing in their right to police other people's speech?

R
Richard Smith
5 years ago

It is appalling that reasoned disagreement gets such a response. Stalinist intolerance and persecution should have no place in life. To hear that it is also happening in the arts - and coming from such a highly-regarded institution - is particularly saddening.

J
Jenny Glynn
5 years ago

Support to you, Jess.

T
Tamara Kennedy
5 years ago

This is terrifying. She is clearly not transphobic and believing that sex is real is not an attack on transgender people. Please can we stop the bullying. It's actually terrifying.

C
Caroline Louise James
5 years ago

I fully support this case which is another example of women's rights being eroded by a small vocal minority whose influence is disproportionate to their numbers

S
Suzi Pender
5 years ago

You have my complete support Jess, and like you I am not transphobic.

E
Elaine Devlin
5 years ago

We get the message - women can be in the RA if they are naked and hanging on the walls. Not as artists, especially talented textile artists. Got it.

A
Anonymous
5 years ago

Jess’s removal seems like a knee jerk reaction to a few loud voices. I would like to see a more considered approach - if artists are offbounds due to their behaviour or beliefs then this should be applied consistently. I am happy to help with research into all the artists associated with the RA if you like, I will be able to assess for wrongthink as well as illegal activity and amoral behaviour

J
J Ross
5 years ago

The RA has been extremely weak and foolish. It has been led by the nose into totalitarian misogyny.

G
Glynis Sutherland
5 years ago

Disgusted at how this artist is being treated.

S
Susie Meehan
5 years ago

Gender critical views are protected under law. Stop punishing women for defining their sex.

A
Anonymous
5 years ago

Cancelling women for stating facts is totally unacceptable to myself and lots of other people, I am very sure.

M
Marjory Powell
5 years ago

Her art is her art. It should be viewed as something in itself - apart from her and whatever her views are.

E
E Evans
5 years ago

Jess us an amazing author I recently bought done if her prints. I'm proudly going to display the ovaflowersin my downstairs loo. I read her blog and nothing in it is hateful. A handful of people complained on Twitter, which is not reflective of society, and the Royal Academy bows down without any critical thinking. Reinstate now and apologise

L
Lucy Cowlin
5 years ago

We should all be worried when perfectly average views in line with the current laws are considered so controversial that the women expressing them are shunned by society.

J
Janice Williams
5 years ago

Stop this belief discrimination or drop Caravaggio and Gill. We OBJECT

A
A Monks
5 years ago

Committed to Equality, Diversity and Inclusion? Unless the artist is a woman who states biological fact.

K
Kerri Clarke
5 years ago

I’m so disappointed in RA. So many male artists with questionable pasta, and Jess stating bloody biological facts warrants this? Disgraceful.

N
Natasha Biggs
5 years ago

Travesty it was ever removed.