Cancel Queen's Blyth Programme

David McDonald
David McDonald 0 Comments
54 SignaturesGoal: 100

As Queen’s University faculty members committed to accessible, progressive and internationalized education, we are writing to share our concerns with the recently developed Queen's-Blyth Worldwide (QBW) programme. We hope you will read this 'open letter' and SIGN THIS PETITION to show your support. We want to send a strong message to the university administration about the need for in-house international programming rather than outsourcing it to a private company....


Queen’s-Blyth Worldwide programme should be cancelled

Desperate times sometimes call for desperate measures, but they do not always result in good choices. A case in point is Queen’s recent decision to partner with a private tourist education company to offer university credits overseas. Little more than an expensive form of edu-tourism, these Queen’s-Blyth Worldwide courses infringe on academic integrity, reinforce colonial stereotypes and privatize post-secondary education.

Our concerns are summarized as follows:

• With prices as high as $8000 for a half-course, the programme is out of reach for most students. To put this in perspective, one QBW course costs as much or more than an entire year of on-campus tuition in the faculty of Arts and Science. They also cost twice as much as a full-course credit that Queen’s already offers in Cuba, which includes two weeks in Kingston doing preparatory work, two weeks in Havana, field trips, living expenses and travel costs.

• Why is Queen’s outsourcing these courses to a private company when we already have internal capacity and expertise? In fact, we have one of the best internationalization records in Canada, with strong pre-departure orientation sessions, post-experiential learning opportunities, and hands-on work placements around the world. The Queen’s-Blyth programme, by contrast, has no pre-departure preparations and is focused on mainstream tourist sites and activities, such as beaches and popular landmarks. Existing Queen’s courses are simply shoehorned into these pre-packaged itineraries because they fit with Blyth’s networks on the ground, not because they have academic connections with a place.

• The Queen’s-Blyth programme also reproduces stereotypical images of non-Canadian destinations, particularly in its so-called “exotic” locales. In Tanzania, for example, “Your safari commences after visiting Maasai villages and the Simanjiro Plains”, where you can “dance alongside the colourful native tribes-people”. The trip to India, meanwhile, “conjures up images of bustling streets, noisy markets, and exotic food….fortunately, some relaxing yoga is included!” Much of this blatantly colonial language has been removed from the website (after complaints were made), but the itineraries and travel partners remain the same.

• Amazingly, there is no apparent business plan for this privatized venture. Despite telling us that it will bring lots of money to Queen’s, the Faculty Office cannot (or will not) tell us how much. When pressed on the matter last year, all the Dean could offer were ‘rough estimates’ of revenues, but no information on expenses or profits. In other words, no one seems to know if the programme will even make money for the university.

• Finally, the programme has been separated from the collective bargaining agreement between Queen’s faculty and administration, allowing Blyth to hire teachers at almost half the rate as on-campus courses. Intellectual property rights are uncertain and faculty must teach on an overload basis if they participate.

We realize these are difficult financial times for post-secondary education in Canada. We also know that Queen’s faculty who have participated in Blyth in the past have done their best to do meaningful work within the constraints of the programme. But surely we can do better. Squeezing our global teaching and learning ambitions into pre-packaged tours from a private company is not the way to internationalize this university. If we are going to make Queen’s a more diverse and accessible place we need something else.

Thankfully, this is a trial programme and can be terminated by Queen’s if it is not working. It is important, therefore, that we send a strong message to our administration asking them to cancel it. As faculty, we can do this by refusing to teach for Blyth. As students, you can refuse to sign up for Blyth courses. And we can all write to the Principal and to the Dean of Arts and Science expressing our concerns.

In its place, Queen’s needs to invest more in in-house international programmes, building on the expertise we already have and enhancing our growing network of international contacts. Internal programmes offer a more rigorous, satisfying and less expensive way for Queen’s students to become engaged in the world around us. There is no reason we cannot continue to do more of this in-house programming in the future.

Signators,

• David McDonald, Professor, Global Development Studies
• Elizabeth Hanson, Professor, English
• Bruce Berman, Professor Emeritus, Political Studies
• Colleen Davison, Adjunct Assistant Professor, Community Health and Epidemiology and Global Development Studies
• Leda Raptis, Professor, Department of Microbiology and Immunology
• Jennifer Ruth Hosek, Associate Professor, Languages Literatures and Cultures
• Robert Lovelace, Adjunct Instructor, Global Development Studies
• Eleanor MacDonald, Associate Professor, Political Studies
• Dorit Naaman, Alliance Atlantis Professor in Film and Media
• Paritosh Kumar, Placements Coordinator, Global Development Studies
• Elaine Power, Associate Professor, Kinesiology and Health Studies
• Frank Burke, Professor, Film and Media
• Samantha King, Associate Professor, Kinesiology and Health Studies
• Jacqueline Davies, Associate Professor, Philosophy
• Margaret Pappano, Associate professor, English
• Villia Jefremovas, Associate Professor, Global Development Studies
• Susan Lord, Associate Professor, Film and Media
• Susanne Soederberg, Professor, Global Development Studies, and Political Studies
• Charlotte Reinholtz, Associate Professor, Linguistics
• Richard Day, Associate Professor, Global Development Studies, Cultural Studies and Sociology
• Mark Jones, Professor, Department of English
• Laura Cameron, Associate Professor, Geography
• Ariel Salzmann, Associate Professor, History
• Karen Frederickson, Associate Professor, Music
• Karen Dubinsky, Professor, History and Global Development Studies
• Annette Burfoot, Associate Professor, Sociology
• Patricia Rae, Professor, English





Links


Comment

54

Signatures