Skip to main content
Put whistle blower in charge of safety at San Onofre Nuclear Dump

Put whistle blower in charge of safety at San Onofre Nuclear Dump

123 signatures 127 to reach 250
B
Bobby V. signed
L
Lisha signed
A
Alysa V. signed
S
Scott M. signed
P
Patty E. signed
S
Someone signed
B
Barbara E. signed
S
Someone signed
B
Beth N. signed
A
Anthony T. signed
GH
Started by Gary Headrick 7 years, 11 months ago

Photo of a spontaneous rally inspired by whistle blower soon after he testified.


We demand that there is a stop work order until needed changes to the safety culture have been put in place and give the whistle blower/hero a promotion that oversees all matters of safety at San Onofre.

On August 9, at Edison's quarterly Community Engagement Panel meeting, a worker at the now defunct nuclear power plant at San Onofre spoke out. He claimed that workers are under qualified and not adequately trained to load nuclear waste fuel from spent fuel pools and insert it in silos where canisters are stored on the beach. He said safety is not put first, workers are understaffed, and that on August 3, one loaded canister was hanging on by a 1/4″ and nearly dropped 18 feet to the concrete below. He promised his daughter he would speak out if Southern California Edison did not inform the public about what happened. See video here.

Tom Palmisano, in charge of decommissioning, was quick to dismiss the incident, saying there was no danger posed to the public or workers. Coincidentally, on August 2, the former head of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), Gregory Jaczko, publicly stated that 1) the NRC no longer puts public safety first and 2) the current plan will likely leave the nuclear waste on the shoreline permanently. To put this all into perspective, one canister holds about as much radioactivity as was released in the 1986 Chernobyl accident covering much of Europe.

San Onofre will be home to 124 such canisters by mid 2019. These canisters are only 5/8" thick, compared to casks which are used in other nuclear powered countries where they are 10" to 20" thick. Edison's thin canisters that are welded shut, cannot be monitored, inspected or repaired. We are facing HUGE consequences by placing our trust in a company that had by far, the worst nuclear safety record of all nuclear plants in the entire nation. This procedure should be stopped and re-evaluated by independent experts immediately.

Not enough is being said about the bold, heroic figure, David Fritch, who put himself at risk in a number of ways, to do the right thing. Gratefully, Tom Palmisano, Edison's Chief Decommissioning Officer, was quick to commend the act, saying, “I’ll make sure with whoever he works for that he’s protected. He has a right to voice his concerns and that’s important. I credit him for bringing up an issue.”

Now we must take it a step further. We are fortunate to know of a man such integrity, who will undoubtedly take a stand for safety, even under the most difficult circumstances. I think one of the best things Edison could do to address the public's concern is to give David Fritch a much larger role in the oversight of all safety matters at SONGS. He's a proven safety advocate that has earned the trust of the community. It is character that counts most, and that is the kind of leadership we need. For a job like this, you can't have better credentials than that.

See comprehensive article on this incident here.

Updates

August 16, 2018

Reaching this level of support has been a long road and my energy is depleted but the momentum keeps me going. It is clear that people refuse to look away from the dangerous reality at the beach. We are tired but we are not stopping until the safety culture at San Onofre is brought into the light.

Reached 100 supporters

August 16, 2018

42 Comments

M
Mary Fischer
7 years ago Featured

Give the Whistle Blower a promotion! Stop work order until necessary & crucial safety changes have been made!

C
Carol Slater
7 years ago Featured

Kudos to David Fritch! I agree, they should advance him into a much larger role in safety oversight.

R
Ruth Strauss MD
7 years ago Featured

How much more do these semi-crazed people at Edison need than the word "Fukushima". How is it even THINKABLE that we could have 5/8' thick cannisters in an earthquake prone area that covers the entire western scenic coast of California and is between two of its landmark cities and beaches. Defies credulity. And the NRC no longer puts public safety first??? HOw much more Orwellian can it get?

M
mel kernahan
7 years ago Featured

It is horrifying to even think this radioactive garbage would be stored on our earthquake fault-riddled seashore.

M
Marilyn and Patrick O'Brien
7 years ago Featured

My husband and i have been on this plant since it began and it seems to get just worse. Do something smart!

J
Jeffrey Steinmetz
7 years ago Featured

THICK CANS not thin! Move the waste to the mesa. Stop the transfer now!!! Insist on real time 24/7/365 public access radiation monitoring at the exhaust vents and not the inlet vents.

L
Lisha
7 years ago

This is extremely important. We need someone competent who cares to take care of this nuclear power plant, or else face extreme horrors that could come from an event matching chernobyl.

A
Alysa Vancas
7 years ago

Save my home. Keep it safe!

Help this petition grow

Share it with friends to help reach 250 signatures.

Sign Petition

We never post to your account. Social sign-in is used only to verify your signature.

or sign with Email

Add a comment?

Your signature will be added via . Tell others why you're signing — it's optional.

By signing, you accept iPetitions Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Share Petition

Don't stop at signing, share the petition link with friends to multiply our impact

Copy link or share directly

Instagram
QR Code