January 18, 2017
Two Bridges Community Residents
To: JDS Development, Two Bridges Associates, Starrett Development, City Planning Commission Chairman Carl Weisbrod, The Honorable Borough President Gale Brewer, Councilwoman Margaret Chin
Cc: The Honorable Mayor Bill DeBlasio, State Senator Daniel Squadron, Assemblywoman Yuh-Line Niou, U.S. Representative Nydia Velasquez, Councilwoman Margaret Chin and Borough President Gale Brewer
Re: Two Bridge EIS (www.twobridgeseis.com) Timeline
We are a concerned group of citizens, voters, Tenant Association members, some of whom sit on the Task Force and lifelong residents of the Two Bridges area. We are writing you to express our concerns about the relative short period being afforded to our community in order to be informed and provide meaningful feedback about the 3 massive developments planned within a two block area in our back yard.
We believe that real Community Engagement requires an authentic process that sincerely seeks to glean community expression; anything less and people come away feeling used. We believe that effective community engagement takes tremendous time and resources to be done effectively and the benefits far outweigh the costs. Expression that once collected and hashed out to a degree can be focused to shape if not outright stop development that we do not feel suits the community’s needs.
The resident leaders in the Two Bridges community have been engaged in a series of Task Force meetings and phone calls in addition to the tightly scheduled Community Engagement Meetings sandwiched often a week or two in between and this is to say nothing of the series of community meetings that must take place between resident leaders and their constituent membership and other interested members of the community. It should go without saying that most of us have full time jobs and other personal responsibilities to attend to, which brings us to another course of action, we are hard pressed to engage but nevertheless are seeking your respective assistance with.
While we understand that the EIS process requires the developers to conduct these CEM events and conduct the community outreach efforts, many people in the Two Bridges Community simply do not trust this hasty process, efforts or the people (who are employed by the developers). Additionally, we appreciate the efforts of those involved with adopting an ‘Enhanced EIS’ process and to the extent it was meant as a genuine attempt to enhance community engagement we hope you’ll recognize that this letter is in that same spirit. Regretfully, due to the crammed nature of the process and the evolving nature of organizing community sentiment we were unable to express our misgivings with sufficient consensus earlier in the process which we believe is further evidence of a need for more time.
We respectfully have two demands:
- To the developers (JDS, L&M, CIM, and Starrett) and DCP, we insist that the timeline of the scoping meeting be pushed to at least September to allow for greater and more meaningful community engagement.
- To our Elected officials, we request more townhalls, forums or other appropriate events within the Two Bridges community that is aimed at developing community expression whether that can be leveraged to shape the EIS analysis or to rally opposition such as it exists within Two Bridges.
As Jane Jacobs states in her book, The Death and Life of Great American Cities, “A successful city neighborhood is a place that keeps sufficiently abreast of its problems so it is not destroyed by them.” We want you (JDS, L&M, CIM, Starrett, DCP and our elected officials) to rectify this otherwise muddled outreach and help us keep our community from being effectively destroyed, after all we are what makes this community. “Somos Siempre Nueva York, we are always New York”; as the mayor said in november, well we wish to remain always who we are in Two Bridges on the Lower East Side. and in order to do so, the community requires more time to be meaningfully included in this process.
Updates
January 23, 2017
I am honestly overwhelmed by how many of you have stepped forward to demand a fair process for our neighborhood. This momentum belongs entirely to the residents who refused to let these plans move forward in the shadows.
Reached 100 supporters
January 23, 2017
36 Comments
Each time when I walk down the F train station, I just can't imagine the increase of 10,000 people all of a sudden sharing the only train station that serves our neighborhood.
There is a dire need, especially with the incoming administration, to have more transparency in the impacts to all areas in all facets. More consideration and conversation must be afforded to all residents in the area. The large scale impact it will have to a low sea level area infrastructure and an increase in occupancy, which long term can affect school zones are a few of many concerns that are plausible enough to grant this gesture. Yes, Land's End deserves the extension to examine ALL aspects of this project!
The Developers claim they want community involvement, but they are not Listening! With the approval of Dept. of City Planning this very complex process has been rushed at a dizzying speed. They need to extend the time-line to give the community the ability to first fully understand what is happening then they can give beneficial input.
We urge you to push back the time-line as more genuine community engagement needs to happen with the residents who live here. This wave of luxury developments will completely transform the grass roots, characteristics and the landscape of this community/neighborhood.
We need REAL Community Engagement and Responsiveness to community needs. Two Bridges does NOT need more luxury housing. We need a greater share of affordable housing and a specific affordability standard that is appropriate for this community. We need lower density housing and more community facilities and a large affordable supermarket. We need our community to be thoroughly engaged so the REAL needs of the community are being served!
Push back the timeline!
Hi all! I'm a concerned member of the community and I have created a GoFundMe to raise $150 to create Facebook ads to inform our community about this petition and other pertinent information. Page: Two Bridges Lower East Side and here's the Go Fund Me Page: https://www.gofundme.com/twobridgeslowereastside
Sign Petition
We never post to your account. Social sign-in is used only to verify your signature.
Add a comment?
Your signature will be added via . Tell others why you're signing — it's optional.
By signing, you accept iPetitions Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
Share Petition
Don't stop at signing, share the petition link with friends to multiply our impact
Copy link or share directly
January 18, 2017
Two Bridges Community Residents
To: JDS Development, Two Bridges Associates, Starrett Development, City Planning Commission Chairman Carl Weisbrod, The Honorable Borough President Gale Brewer, Councilwoman Margaret Chin
Cc: The Honorable Mayor Bill DeBlasio, State Senator Daniel Squadron, Assemblywoman Yuh-Line Niou, U.S. Representative Nydia Velasquez, Councilwoman Margaret Chin and Borough President Gale Brewer
Re: Two Bridge EIS (www.twobridgeseis.com) Timeline
We are a concerned group of citizens, voters, Tenant Association members, some of whom sit on the Task Force and lifelong residents of the Two Bridges area. We are writing you to express our concerns about the relative short period being afforded to our community in order to be informed and provide meaningful feedback about the 3 massive developments planned within a two block area in our back yard.
We believe that real Community Engagement requires an authentic process that sincerely seeks to glean community expression; anything less and people come away feeling used. We believe that effective community engagement takes tremendous time and resources to be done effectively and the benefits far outweigh the costs. Expression that once collected and hashed out to a degree can be focused to shape if not outright stop development that we do not feel suits the community’s needs.
The resident leaders in the Two Bridges community have been engaged in a series of Task Force meetings and phone calls in addition to the tightly scheduled Community Engagement Meetings sandwiched often a week or two in between and this is to say nothing of the series of community meetings that must take place between resident leaders and their constituent membership and other interested members of the community. It should go without saying that most of us have full time jobs and other personal responsibilities to attend to, which brings us to another course of action, we are hard pressed to engage but nevertheless are seeking your respective assistance with.
While we understand that the EIS process requires the developers to conduct these CEM events and conduct the community outreach efforts, many people in the Two Bridges Community simply do not trust this hasty process, efforts or the people (who are employed by the developers). Additionally, we appreciate the efforts of those involved with adopting an ‘Enhanced EIS’ process and to the extent it was meant as a genuine attempt to enhance community engagement we hope you’ll recognize that this letter is in that same spirit. Regretfully, due to the crammed nature of the process and the evolving nature of organizing community sentiment we were unable to express our misgivings with sufficient consensus earlier in the process which we believe is further evidence of a need for more time.
We respectfully have two demands:
- To the developers (JDS, L&M, CIM, and Starrett) and DCP, we insist that the timeline of the scoping meeting be pushed to at least September to allow for greater and more meaningful community engagement.
- To our Elected officials, we request more townhalls, forums or other appropriate events within the Two Bridges community that is aimed at developing community expression whether that can be leveraged to shape the EIS analysis or to rally opposition such as it exists within Two Bridges.
As Jane Jacobs states in her book, The Death and Life of Great American Cities, “A successful city neighborhood is a place that keeps sufficiently abreast of its problems so it is not destroyed by them.” We want you (JDS, L&M, CIM, Starrett, DCP and our elected officials) to rectify this otherwise muddled outreach and help us keep our community from being effectively destroyed, after all we are what makes this community. “Somos Siempre Nueva York, we are always New York”; as the mayor said in november, well we wish to remain always who we are in Two Bridges on the Lower East Side. and in order to do so, the community requires more time to be meaningfully included in this process.
Updates
January 23, 2017
I am honestly overwhelmed by how many of you have stepped forward to demand a fair process for our neighborhood. This momentum belongs entirely to the residents who refused to let these plans move forward in the shadows.
Reached 100 supporters
January 23, 2017
36 Comments
Please push back the EIS timeline. This whole process has been rushed especially since we started right before the holidays in December. These towers will irrevocably change the neighborhood forever. Residents need more time for a genuine community engagement process!
Each time when I walk down the F train station, I just can't imagine the increase of 10,000 people all of a sudden sharing the only train station that serves our neighborhood.
There is a dire need, especially with the incoming administration, to have more transparency in the impacts to all areas in all facets. More consideration and conversation must be afforded to all residents in the area. The large scale impact it will have to a low sea level area infrastructure and an increase in occupancy, which long term can affect school zones are a few of many concerns that are plausible enough to grant this gesture. Yes, Land's End deserves the extension to examine ALL aspects of this project!
The Developers claim they want community involvement, but they are not Listening! With the approval of Dept. of City Planning this very complex process has been rushed at a dizzying speed. They need to extend the time-line to give the community the ability to first fully understand what is happening then they can give beneficial input.
We urge you to push back the time-line as more genuine community engagement needs to happen with the residents who live here. This wave of luxury developments will completely transform the grass roots, characteristics and the landscape of this community/neighborhood.
We need REAL Community Engagement and Responsiveness to community needs. Two Bridges does NOT need more luxury housing. We need a greater share of affordable housing and a specific affordability standard that is appropriate for this community. We need lower density housing and more community facilities and a large affordable supermarket. We need our community to be thoroughly engaged so the REAL needs of the community are being served!
Push back the timeline!
Hi all! I'm a concerned member of the community and I have created a GoFundMe to raise $150 to create Facebook ads to inform our community about this petition and other pertinent information. Page: Two Bridges Lower East Side and here's the Go Fund Me Page: https://www.gofundme.com/twobridgeslowereastside
Help this petition grow
Share it with friends to help reach 250 signatures.
Sign Petition
We never post to your account. Social sign-in is used only to verify your signature.
Add a comment?
Your signature will be added via .
Tell others why you're signing — it's optional.
Signing with Google or Facebook verifies your signature instantly — no email needed.
By signing, you accept iPetitions Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
Share Petition
Don't stop at signing, share the petition link with friends to multiply our impact
Petitions like this
Other petitions you might want to support
Make your voice count today!
Scan to share
Anyone who scans this can sign the petition.
Please push back the EIS timeline. This whole process has been rushed especially since we started right before the holidays in December. These towers will irrevocably change the neighborhood forever. Residents need more time for a genuine community engagement process!