Skip to main content

Protect Our Year Names- Mission to Save Tradition

128 Comments

D
Daniel Cooper 2T
11 years ago

It's just a waste of time

A
Alexander Neal
11 years ago Featured

It's pointless changing it.. changing year names won't improve our school, it will just make it a bit more average.. boring.

K
Kane Donaghy 2G
11 years ago

I think the years idea is good and keep it. BLOCK THE HATERS QUOTED BY niamh hethrington

J
James Casey-Gibbs
11 years ago

Don't fix it if it ain't broke.

P
patrick bishop 2g
11 years ago

it makes us unique.

F
Fraser Gilliat 1G
11 years ago

Keep the year names. We're fine as we are, thanks!

J
Jake knowles 2t
11 years ago

OUR YEAR NAMES< KEEP THE YEAR NAMES

W
Will
11 years ago

Absolute joke, next thing we'll be doing Ag and Hort and ICT as a GCSE...

H
Harry Bower
11 years ago

#missionfortradition

C
Chris White
11 years ago

No change. Bigger numbers are harder.

A
Anonymous
11 years ago Featured

LRGS has changed a lot for better or worse over my time but this is not on. In no way does it benefit our school, we are not a comprehensive and next you'll be putting us in 'sets' and getting rid of games. A fundamental part of our school is that we are different from the rest of the Lancaster mob and we shouldn't be changing ourselves to fit in with the norm, but rather be proud of our differences.

J
James Beet
11 years ago

#saveLRGS

N
Nicolas
11 years ago

SO AGREE

L
Larry Wong
11 years ago

LRGS thrives on tradition, it's what defines us. This cannot happen.

P
PATRICK THOMAS
11 years ago

STAY WITH TRADITION!!! BESIDES WHO CAN REMEMBER WHICH YEAR IS WHICH??

D
Daniel Henderson
11 years ago

this is outrageous

J
John Dibble
11 years ago

SDFAGRET

J
James Weir
11 years ago

How could they do this? LRGS stand firm!

A
Anonymous
11 years ago

THIS SCHOOL IS GOING TO THE DOGS

A
Anonymous
11 years ago

THIS SCHOOL IS GOING TO THE DOGS