our home backs to riverside further down and we hear the same complaints! If there is anything that we can do, I am in support!
J
Jennifer DiCenzo
11 years ago
As a homeowner and one of the homes listed on this petition, I have to dispute the comment regarding the "less cost", the homes sit on a cul de sac and therefore are actually at a premium to other homes not on the cul de sac setting. My site plan when purchasing my home shows 8 trees across the back of my property, and while I don't have an issue watering the trees, I don't think I was asked permission to plant a dozen trees that die each year in the conservancy area on Chartier Drive. It's apples to apples.
A
Ashish hansalia
11 years ago
The row of privacy trees will also protect younger kids from going towards the road
D
Donna bernier
11 years ago
I never understood why the HOA would not fill in both trees and evergreens (nice talk blue spruce) to block the houses.
C
Chad M
11 years ago
If the Lansdowne HOA were to pay for something like this they would charge an assessment. These properties were purchased with the knowledge of the road exposure and it's probably safe to say they were sold for slight less than their comparables because of it.
M
Meghan McLane Moore
11 years ago
I was under the impression that we need to plant our own trees if extra privacy is needed? This is not a new road.
J
Jean Garrell
11 years ago
Featured
The only objection that has been received from potential buyers is the view of the road and the road noise. One of the best/most economical ways to handle this objection is planting a mature, natural tree barrier.
P
Paola M. Fisher
11 years ago
I concur. That would be a huge deterrent for me
To buy there are well and some privacy trees would go a long way both for the home owners and for the community at large that lost so many trees during construction...
our home backs to riverside further down and we hear the same complaints! If there is anything that we can do, I am in support!
As a homeowner and one of the homes listed on this petition, I have to dispute the comment regarding the "less cost", the homes sit on a cul de sac and therefore are actually at a premium to other homes not on the cul de sac setting. My site plan when purchasing my home shows 8 trees across the back of my property, and while I don't have an issue watering the trees, I don't think I was asked permission to plant a dozen trees that die each year in the conservancy area on Chartier Drive. It's apples to apples.
The row of privacy trees will also protect younger kids from going towards the road
I never understood why the HOA would not fill in both trees and evergreens (nice talk blue spruce) to block the houses.
If the Lansdowne HOA were to pay for something like this they would charge an assessment. These properties were purchased with the knowledge of the road exposure and it's probably safe to say they were sold for slight less than their comparables because of it.
I was under the impression that we need to plant our own trees if extra privacy is needed? This is not a new road.
The only objection that has been received from potential buyers is the view of the road and the road noise. One of the best/most economical ways to handle this objection is planting a mature, natural tree barrier.
I concur. That would be a huge deterrent for me To buy there are well and some privacy trees would go a long way both for the home owners and for the community at large that lost so many trees during construction...
I