So true I write a clever funny response and it's sniped. Meanwhile you see meat head sexual induendos and making fun of people posted constantly
B
Bubba Horton
5 years ago
Funny how the media fights for stuff then commits the same actions. Florio
A
Anonymous
5 years ago
You can’t even cite articles that they’ve written. They crapped all over Kaepernicks play in his last year in the league but act clueless as to why he’s not on a team now. That’s just one example but it applies to every topic. Always shaping the narrative.
D
Daniel J Haddad
6 years ago
Featured
The lack of an ability for users to discuss the censors is why the problem is so unknown. Comments gets deleted, users get deleted, and are never given a reason why. There's no way for them to ask for a reason or to complain, so the only person who knows is the user, aside from the censor.
T
Travis Luraas
6 years ago
Consistently censoring comments if it doesn't fit the articles agenda. It's definitely very real. I went to search if there were anybody talking about it and it brought me here. Slanted torwards the left leaning crowd. Controlled speech geared towards influencing its reader to believe they are in the majority when its many times its the opposite or very much 50/50. Many comments that just aren't even controversial or hateful are still being censored.
A
Anonymous
11 years ago
Florio is, by far, the most heavy handed and cowardly censor I have ever encountered. He flat-out can't handle the slightest dissent to his articles.
E
Enam
11 years ago
Florio is, by far, the most heavy handed and cowardly censor I have ever encountered. He flat-out can't handle the slightest dissent to his articles.
D
David
11 years ago
Featured
Have cited sources, evidence to contradict the argument of renaming the Redskins (am a Saints fan); have also questioned examples of apparent bias on the part of Darin Gnat, a former Panthers beat writer; mostly have challenged Florio on his liberal politics and agenda; amazed at his hypocrisy how he espouses individual rights as a lawyer yet he and his staff won't tolerate a difference of opinion; I'd just like to see him have to answer that criticism in un uncensored, unscripted television broadcast forum...
B
Bob
12 years ago
Could part of it be their archaic commenting system?
Innuendos
So true I write a clever funny response and it's sniped. Meanwhile you see meat head sexual induendos and making fun of people posted constantly
Funny how the media fights for stuff then commits the same actions. Florio
You can’t even cite articles that they’ve written. They crapped all over Kaepernicks play in his last year in the league but act clueless as to why he’s not on a team now. That’s just one example but it applies to every topic. Always shaping the narrative.
The lack of an ability for users to discuss the censors is why the problem is so unknown. Comments gets deleted, users get deleted, and are never given a reason why. There's no way for them to ask for a reason or to complain, so the only person who knows is the user, aside from the censor.
Consistently censoring comments if it doesn't fit the articles agenda. It's definitely very real. I went to search if there were anybody talking about it and it brought me here. Slanted torwards the left leaning crowd. Controlled speech geared towards influencing its reader to believe they are in the majority when its many times its the opposite or very much 50/50. Many comments that just aren't even controversial or hateful are still being censored.
Florio is, by far, the most heavy handed and cowardly censor I have ever encountered. He flat-out can't handle the slightest dissent to his articles.
Florio is, by far, the most heavy handed and cowardly censor I have ever encountered. He flat-out can't handle the slightest dissent to his articles.
Have cited sources, evidence to contradict the argument of renaming the Redskins (am a Saints fan); have also questioned examples of apparent bias on the part of Darin Gnat, a former Panthers beat writer; mostly have challenged Florio on his liberal politics and agenda; amazed at his hypocrisy how he espouses individual rights as a lawyer yet he and his staff won't tolerate a difference of opinion; I'd just like to see him have to answer that criticism in un uncensored, unscripted television broadcast forum...
Could part of it be their archaic commenting system?