Skip to main content

Prevent Flooding in Stonington CT

20 Comments

A
Anonymous
2 years ago

Thank you

H
Harmony Eidolon
2 years ago

We deserve to be safe! Develop inland.

M
Mariah
2 years ago

Preserve old Mystic!

K
Kris Smith-Lavoie
2 years ago

Protect Stonington from flooding.

J
Jeffery Valentine
2 years ago

Accountability

A
Anthony Fraser
2 years ago

Save the wetlands!

M
Mike W
2 years ago

I agree

L
Lydia Pan
2 years ago Featured

Smarter development is need to manage flood risks and protect our vital but vulnerable wetlands. Thank you for all your great work.

B
Betsy Graham
2 years ago Featured

These zoning changes are vital for the long-term welfare of the entire community, not just a select few. Climatic changes are not going away. The wearing of blinders by a few powerful will only stall effective changes until it is too late for the less fortunate residents. Change can be scary, but not as much as being underwater.

A
Anonymous
2 years ago Featured

Restoring natural floodplains and catchment ecosystems is vital to our future generations.

G
Gordon Moss
2 years ago

Listen to the well thought through words here. Coastal land development is the wasteful way to spend your dollars.

L
Lynne Marshall
2 years ago Featured

These common-sense goals are an important piece of the puzzle to protect the Mystic River Watershed, an area encompassing 4 towns and 2 Tribal Nations. The Zoning Commission should update their regulations to spell out how to accomplish these goals. Why? Under the current system, for example, new development can cause neighbors to be flooded; standing water, which is excellent for breeding mosquitoes, to be created; and vernal pools, which are breeding sites for the mosquito-eating tree frogs and salamanders, to be destroyed. Improved regulations can prevent these and other problems from negatively, impacting the health, welfare, and enjoyment of our communities.

S
Sam Keller
2 years ago

Stop the development for the sake of the community!

M
Mark
2 years ago Featured

all development needs to be looked at more closely to avoid ecological catastrophe. All too often it seems the builders and towns only see the revenue generated, and are blind to the ecological impact small and large projects have-

E
Eric Weindel
2 years ago

I think the proposals are pragmatic and sensible

P
Peter Booker
2 years ago

Great petition initiated by Mr. Fontanella

M
Marty Booker
2 years ago

I think it’s very important to protect our precious natural resources. The quality of our water affects our town, our citizens and our wildlife.

P
Paul OConnor
2 years ago Featured

Development without consideration of the real, current effects of climate change and the increased probability of extreme weather events is the antithesis to municipal planning. Floodwater doesnt care about future projected budgets, and new buildings that are underwater bring no future tax revenue. A realistic and wholistic approach to planning that includes buffer zones, wetland areas, and open green spaces are the only responsible way to account for sustainable development moving forward

A
Anonymous
2 years ago

Honestly, it's just beyond ridiculous that the town doesn't take this more serious at this point. Can't just wash your hands of it and hope it just goes away

C
Christopher Dale Ryan
2 years ago

This is absolutely necessary for the continued health and economic well-being of our communities and our country.