The
Ridgewood Planning Board is currently considering amending the town’s Master
Plan with three re-zonings to accommodate four high-density developments.
The re-zoning will change the current limit of 12 units per acre to 40-50 units
per acre and will allow building heights up to 55 feet. This will enable
real estate developers to build towering,high-densitystructures
designed to attract hundreds of new residents to Ridgewood's Central Business
District (CBR). The current proposal would allow the addition of over 400 residential units
to the CBR. This will undoubtedly bring amajor influx of new
students to our already overtaxed schools,significant traffic to our
already congested streets, more strain on municipal facilities, less attractive
views, less parking and less open space.
Theimposing
structures beingproposedwill damage the character and
attractiveness of our town and be the first step in turning our Village into a
city. Not even the much more urban town of Hackensack allows a
density as high as the 47 units per acre being proposed. Should this plan
go through, other developers will certainly argue that they too should be
allowed to build on the same scale. It is a slippery slope.
Who,
other than the four developers will benefit from these new mixed-use housing
developments? The addition of four massive, high-density housing units
will not help the Village of Ridgewood. We do not believe that the
Planning Board and Mayor and Council should make such far-reaching, irrevocable
and damaging changes to the Village, which only benefit a limited group of developers
whose sole interest is to maximize profits.
We
believe that the current zoning ordinances permitting a maximum of 12 acres
should remain intact (or be increased only slightly) and that the Ken Smith,
Brogan, Chestnut St. and Sealfons lots should be redeveloped as beautiful,
multi-use, well-planned properties that:
Work within the letter and intent of current zoning law, or with
only a slight increase in density.
Provide a look, feel and size that compliment, not change, our
downtown.
Provide much needed additional public parking and green space.
In the long run, more residential housing is net tax negative. I oppose more residential building. It will increase everyone's taxes. If the masterplan is to be updated, parcels in question should be zoned for recreational commercial use. Public amenities such as parks, indoor pools, ice rinks, roller rinks, theatre, movies, should be of the highest priority.