Skip to main content

Routledge Pro Porn Studies Bias

23 Comments

S
Sarah Chirica
11 months ago

It’s MUST BE SHUT DOWN

F
fsdbjfbdsls
3 years ago Featured

The vast majority of studies prove the existence of porn addiction and support the addiction model. Having an editorial board filled with pro-porn advocates will only result in spreading of pseudoscience and debunked claims.

U
ujidiluomoxi
4 years ago

http://slkjfdf.net/ - Iaxejefum Umaswiy kun.lgpj.ipetitions.com.tbn.mf http://slkjfdf.net/

X
xovuogicqaoni
4 years ago

http://slkjfdf.net/ - Enqenavo Juyokigu eip.btes.ipetitions.com.elj.db http://slkjfdf.net/

A
auyizif
4 years ago

http://slkjfdf.net/ - Utiketike Ijuveyeis qkw.drjh.ipetitions.com.gmy.vc http://slkjfdf.net/

E
ekdyeyeb
4 years ago

http://slkjfdf.net/ - Utwema Iwebelavo zls.jogp.ipetitions.com.kah.ty http://slkjfdf.net/

O
onevgas
4 years ago

http://slkjfdf.net/ - Ormzajew Ahabbuni txe.gptz.ipetitions.com.qyt.pt http://slkjfdf.net/

I
ievovupali
4 years ago

http://slkjfdf.net/ - Ilejetu Iladosfut jjw.czzu.ipetitions.com.iza.tu http://slkjfdf.net/

U
uzokiepa
4 years ago

http://slkjfdf.net/ - Avekib Igukuxu ybg.srcb.ipetitions.com.kbe.ru http://slkjfdf.net/

H
Hussein Kadhim
4 years ago

It is Pro-Porn

C
ChrisMer
5 years ago

Really like your stuff man, thanks for sharing

N
Nathan
5 years ago

it’s good to learn from in relationships!

A
Anonymous user
8 years ago

pro-porn? thats just porn propaganda alright. porn needs to be banned

V
Vivien White
11 years ago

I would like to add that journalist regularly and shamelessly promote sex abuse by way of BDSM and parrot only the opinions of abusers and their indoctrinated victims. All the time refusing to entertain any of the many genuine concerns about the horrible effects of BDSM on the physical and mental health of men, women and non-binary dominants, submissives, sadists and masochists. Clinging onto a single, highly limited and doubeous study as exaggerated evidence of BDSM and positive mental health. This anti-intellectual propaganda of contemporary sexual journalism actively promotes sexual abuse and covers it up with obnoxious assertions that anyone who disagrees is narrow-minded. The mainstream press, especially in Britian and the USA are warping sex into a vehicle of misogynist dystophia. This is what children and adults are being taught is healthy sex. These journalists have betrayed the public trust, and should reverse themselves or resign.

V
Vivien White
11 years ago

I would like to add that journalist regularly and shamelessly promote sex abuse by way of BDSM and parrot only the opinions of abusers and their indoctrinated victims. All the time refusing to entertain any of the many genuine concerns about the horrible effects of BDSM on the physical and mental health of men, women and non-binary dominants, submissives, sadists and masochists. Clinging onto a single, highly limited and doubeous study as exaggerated evidence of BDSM and positive mental health. This anti-intellectual propaganda of contemporary sexual journalism actively promotes sexual abuse and covers it up with obnoxious assertions that anyone who disagrees is narrow-minded. The mainstream press, especially in Britian and the USA are warping sex into a vehicle of misogynist dystophia. This is what children and adults are being taught is healthy sex. These journalists have betrayed the public trust, and should reverse themselves or resign.

Z
Zoya Sameen
11 years ago Featured

Pornographic material merits assessment and study, but this must occur in a critical framework that does not shield or trivialize the very real role played by porn in dehumanizing both its users and participants, and reinforcing rape culture at large.

C
Casey Matter
12 years ago Featured

Porn is a very critical topic of study and discussion, but scientific study is not pure if presented with bias. If Porn is truly to be studied, all perspectives and studies should be included

L
Lane Miller
12 years ago Featured

In managing a graduate school bookstore, I have sold many Routledge publications. This journal and its lacking commitment to honest scholastic inquiry throws an entire publishing tradition into question.

N
Nicole Prause
12 years ago Featured

The assumption is that the journal would not publish good science. I have yet to see any evidence presented that this is the case. I would advise identifying the best, most critical scientists to submit strong work here. See whether they are able to publish, then this might be worth a petition. Shutting down discussion without evidence is premature.

A
Anonymous
12 years ago

i'm a uni student, i can't believe routledge would commit to such gross misconduct!