Petition to TMBC Planning, Objection to Kershaw Lane, Celestial Church Extension
39 Comments
M
Marie coward
6 years ago
Unfair to residents re noise levels and extra cars and traffic
M
Margaret Elaine Howarth
6 years ago
This is very wrong to expand an already noisey, nuisance please think about the residents in the area
P
Paul hurstfield
6 years ago
Has this building not got a covenant on It? As I thought the land was donated by Bayer Peacocks
A
Anonymous
6 years ago
Too much noise and too much mess. This isn't for the community as when have the community been invited to join the congregation? The noise is horrendous, if that was a party of teenagers cause that noise pollution it would have been shut down!
M
Marilyn Woodcock
6 years ago
Featured
It cannot be allowed, not just because the area is residential , but why on earth does a church need to apply for living accommodation! It’s just wrong. There are lots of churches around the area who do not have living accommodation , and never had it , it’s unheard of . This is my reason for signing this petition and why this application should be rejected.
A
Anonymous
6 years ago
My friends live at the side of this church & the noise levels are disgraceful. I object
N
Nicola Anderton
6 years ago
As per the petition I see no positive outcome in the local community allowing this second phase to take place
P
Pamela Watkin
6 years ago
This church has already caused so many problems for local residents, let's hope the Council doesnt let them down again by allowing this proposed extension.
M
Mr Lee Cullen
6 years ago
I see no need whatsoever for the need for living accommodation,this in no way benefits the community in which it is based.
A
Anonymous
6 years ago
The noise nuisance is already to much
S
Steve Williams
6 years ago
A poor choice by the council, non of the congregation are local residents, a local football team offered to buy this property for the use of local residents and wanted to continue providing facilities for all age groups but were denied.
A second storey would have a detrimental effect on several properties on Porlock avenue due to a lack of sunlight in the mid/late afternoon.
The noise has forced the closest resident to put there property up for sale as the can't stand it anymore, the litter and fires from burning waste have increased the vermin in the area ten fold.
M
Mrs sweeney
6 years ago
No to these plans!!!
A
Anonymous
6 years ago
Noise not good in a residential area
L
Lorna France
6 years ago
I agree with the objections raised in the petition. The lives of the local residents will be negatively affected due to parking and noise.
E
Elaine Fraser
6 years ago
I agree with the concerns noted in the petition as this facility is already adversely affecting the lives of nearby residents and to extend this facility will only add to the anti social behaviours from it.
J
Jim
6 years ago
Featured
No money for a playgroup or youth club but plenty for it to be spent on extending the now ‘church’. There’s limited parking, the service users are extremely noisy and have no regard for local residents. They don’t keep ‘church’ hours.
This should never have even been considered
L
Lisa McManamon
6 years ago
Featured
This used to be a playgroup that closed due to lack of funds, same again for the youth club and then miraculously there’s money in the funds for it to be extended as a ‘church’. It’s outrageous.
Unfair to residents re noise levels and extra cars and traffic
This is very wrong to expand an already noisey, nuisance please think about the residents in the area
Has this building not got a covenant on It? As I thought the land was donated by Bayer Peacocks
Too much noise and too much mess. This isn't for the community as when have the community been invited to join the congregation? The noise is horrendous, if that was a party of teenagers cause that noise pollution it would have been shut down!
It cannot be allowed, not just because the area is residential , but why on earth does a church need to apply for living accommodation! It’s just wrong. There are lots of churches around the area who do not have living accommodation , and never had it , it’s unheard of . This is my reason for signing this petition and why this application should be rejected.
My friends live at the side of this church & the noise levels are disgraceful. I object
As per the petition I see no positive outcome in the local community allowing this second phase to take place
This church has already caused so many problems for local residents, let's hope the Council doesnt let them down again by allowing this proposed extension.
I see no need whatsoever for the need for living accommodation,this in no way benefits the community in which it is based.
The noise nuisance is already to much
A poor choice by the council, non of the congregation are local residents, a local football team offered to buy this property for the use of local residents and wanted to continue providing facilities for all age groups but were denied. A second storey would have a detrimental effect on several properties on Porlock avenue due to a lack of sunlight in the mid/late afternoon. The noise has forced the closest resident to put there property up for sale as the can't stand it anymore, the litter and fires from burning waste have increased the vermin in the area ten fold.
No to these plans!!!
Noise not good in a residential area
I agree with the objections raised in the petition. The lives of the local residents will be negatively affected due to parking and noise.
I agree with the concerns noted in the petition as this facility is already adversely affecting the lives of nearby residents and to extend this facility will only add to the anti social behaviours from it.
No money for a playgroup or youth club but plenty for it to be spent on extending the now ‘church’. There’s limited parking, the service users are extremely noisy and have no regard for local residents. They don’t keep ‘church’ hours. This should never have even been considered
This used to be a playgroup that closed due to lack of funds, same again for the youth club and then miraculously there’s money in the funds for it to be extended as a ‘church’. It’s outrageous.
No no no
Needs to be closed down.