Petition to review fairness of Civil Litigation Exam 14/12/2015
38 Comments
D
David Hayes
10 years ago
Featured
201588291. Agree with the points raised here. The past papers were useless for this format.
S
Sarah Hudson
10 years ago
Featured
The exam was totally different from what we practiced. Spent way too much time just unpacking the questions, leaving nothing to actually write good answers. Stressful and unfair.
C
Christina Currie
10 years ago
201554786
M
Matthew Braidwood
10 years ago
201573756
P
Paul Francis McKenna
10 years ago
Featured
May the decision makers in the consideration of this petition arrive at a decision which is not;
So outrageous in its defiance of logic or accepted moral standards that no sensible person who had applied his mind to the question to be decided could have arrived at it.
As per Lord Diplock in Council of Civil Service Unions v Minister for the Civil Service [1983] UKHL 6
(PF McKenna matric no. 201551343)
C
Chris Miller
10 years ago
201582755
R
Robyn Tracey
10 years ago
201561535
R
Rachel Bell
10 years ago
201554972
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
201594257
J
Jane Elliott
10 years ago
Featured
we were NOT made aware by our tutor that we should have watched ALL webcasts, not just those related to semester's teaching and topics. Some tutors told their students to do this- disadvantageous to those students who were not advised. No advice on MyPlace to this effect
M
Melanie Paterson
10 years ago
201555637
S
Sean Folan
10 years ago
201554245
D
Daniel Canning
10 years ago
201561688
D
Daniel Caplan
10 years ago
201585517
L
Liam McGuigan
10 years ago
201567519
A
Antony Millar
10 years ago
Reg no: 201592702
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
Featured
201554843
I felt that the paper was considerably difficult. I'm comparison to previous years, the structure was different and the questions were too lenghy and there was not enough time to read it all and answer the questions. the questions asked were very specific to areas that were not covered in great detail in Webcasts. additionally the only source of guidance we had were past papers and the exam was nothing like the past papers.
201588291. Agree with the points raised here. The past papers were useless for this format.
The exam was totally different from what we practiced. Spent way too much time just unpacking the questions, leaving nothing to actually write good answers. Stressful and unfair.
201554786
201573756
May the decision makers in the consideration of this petition arrive at a decision which is not; So outrageous in its defiance of logic or accepted moral standards that no sensible person who had applied his mind to the question to be decided could have arrived at it. As per Lord Diplock in Council of Civil Service Unions v Minister for the Civil Service [1983] UKHL 6 (PF McKenna matric no. 201551343)
201582755
201561535
201554972
201594257
we were NOT made aware by our tutor that we should have watched ALL webcasts, not just those related to semester's teaching and topics. Some tutors told their students to do this- disadvantageous to those students who were not advised. No advice on MyPlace to this effect
201555637
201554245
201561688
201585517
201567519
Reg no: 201592702
201554843 I felt that the paper was considerably difficult. I'm comparison to previous years, the structure was different and the questions were too lenghy and there was not enough time to read it all and answer the questions. the questions asked were very specific to areas that were not covered in great detail in Webcasts. additionally the only source of guidance we had were past papers and the exam was nothing like the past papers.
This petition has my full backing.
Reg No. - 201554083
201564167