Petition to Restore the BOCC Legal Descriptions to the Wet Mountain Valley Tribune
67 Comments
R
Robert Dreher
11 years ago
Let's get this turned around.
M
Michael Poisson
11 years ago
Restore the BOCC Legal Descriptions to the Wet Mountain Valley Tribune
B
Brent Bruser
11 years ago
I find the Sentinel offensive. As a former banking executive with management responsibility over our marketing and advertising function we would base our ad placement decisions based upon a cost analysis of the market share of each publication or media outlet. Also, market demographics of readership was also a factor in placement. The Sentinel meets neither test, market share dinance or representative market demographics. The BOCC should resend their decision media rely.
J
J.R. Donahue-Sowell
11 years ago
...This seems so illogical...
T
Tom Wallerich
11 years ago
No reason to change except vengeance
T
TC Smythe
11 years ago
Legal notices are meant to be published to the widest and most diverse forum. The Sentinel is not such a forum.
R
Roberta Trout
11 years ago
Logic would dictate that "public notices" would be published in a venue where they would be seen by most of the public. Were that the case, the obvious choice would be the Wet Mountain Tribune. Thus logic cannot be behind the commissioners' decision. Then, of course the supporting of a "small business" argument??? Does that then mean that the Tribune qualifies as a big business? What a travesty!
Let's get this turned around.
Restore the BOCC Legal Descriptions to the Wet Mountain Valley Tribune
I find the Sentinel offensive. As a former banking executive with management responsibility over our marketing and advertising function we would base our ad placement decisions based upon a cost analysis of the market share of each publication or media outlet. Also, market demographics of readership was also a factor in placement. The Sentinel meets neither test, market share dinance or representative market demographics. The BOCC should resend their decision media rely.
...This seems so illogical...
No reason to change except vengeance
Legal notices are meant to be published to the widest and most diverse forum. The Sentinel is not such a forum.
Logic would dictate that "public notices" would be published in a venue where they would be seen by most of the public. Were that the case, the obvious choice would be the Wet Mountain Tribune. Thus logic cannot be behind the commissioners' decision. Then, of course the supporting of a "small business" argument??? Does that then mean that the Tribune qualifies as a big business? What a travesty!