Petition to Pennsylvania State Legislature, the
Pennsylvania Medical Society, and Related Specialty
Societies to Take Action on Act 112.
Whereas, Pennsylvania Act 112 requires that institutions
and interpreting physicians take action to notify patients
in writing of any serious findings, and
Whereas; It is well recognized that the healthcare provider
who orders studies on their patients, and who knows the
patient's clinical situation, is the best person to
interpret and relate findings to a patient, and
Whereas; Abnormal findings on studies should be interpreted
in the context of the patients condition, and
Whereas; The individual reading said studies may have
little or no insight into the patient's clinical status or
the relevance of significant abnormal findings, and
Whereas; the individual reading said studies likely has no
doctor-patient relationship with the patient, makes it
inappropriate for him or her to properly communicate
findings to the patient, and
Whereas; many studies include findings that the
interpreting physician may or may not be able to be
determined as to the significance clinically to any given
patient, and
Whereas; abnormal findings given to patients in writing may
inappropriately alarm a patient who may not be able to
appropriately understand and react to said information, and
Whereas; many reported findings may unduly alarm patients,
resulting in severe stress, and may drive them to actions
that are inappropriate and may drive them to demand
unnecessary additional work-ups and studies, and
Whereas; communication in writing with a patient may
establish a defacto doctor-patient relationship resulting in
inappropriate responsibilities and liabilities,
Be it therefore Resolved:
That the undersigned hereby request that our Pennsylvania
Legislature Repeal Act 112, and ask that they collaborate
with our Pennsylvania Medical Society and relevant Specialty
Societies to establish more appropriate communication
options:
Name: (Print legibly) Signature: Voting Address: E-mail:
___________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
The original legislation foments inherent conflict between the patient, their primary care provider and the diagnostic radiologist whose traditional role has been consultant to the latter.