Skip to main content
Petition to lower the military budget and give more funding to higher education.

Petition to lower the military budget and give more funding to higher education.

51 signatures 49 to reach 100
E
elliot s. signed
S
Someone signed
L
Libby H. signed
Z
Zed E. signed
L
Lei L. signed
S
Shuoshu H. signed
M
Mingfei Z. signed
O
Olaf C. signed
S
Sanshan L. signed
Q
QuanQuan W. signed
FL
Started by Fanpu Liu 12 years, 3 months ago


Objective:

The average out-of-state higher education tuition is $22,000, so college tuition is not affordable for a lot of families in America. But most of the good jobs in this country require a higher education. How is the next generation supposed to become educated and join the workforce? We petition the US government to re-evaluate the military spending budget to fund higher education.


Some numbers for background information:

In 2009, when the budget was $515.4 billion, Barney Frank suggested a 25% cut of the military budget . According to Barney Frank, who was chairman of the House Financial Services Committee from 2007 to 2011, the US “would still be immeasurably stronger than any combination of nations with whom we might be engaged”. In 2012, the military budget was $645 billion, which was 37% of the whole financial year budget. The 2012 U.S. military budget was approximately 39% of global arms spending. In the same year, the budget of China was $143 billion, and the budget of Russia was $71 billion.

The US military budget is $526.6 billion for FY 2014, which is 43.6% of the whole financial year budget.


Some specific suggestions for cutting military spending :

1.The government spends a lot of money on GBU-31’s, a kind of weapon that is a Joint Direct Attack Munition (JDAM) which has been made in the US since 1999. In other words, it has a 15-year history. The production cost of this weaponis about $21,000 for each set. The plan of the government is to keep 240,000 sets in stock which means a $5.04 million stock in warehouse. It is currently in full-rate production. It should be phased out because in fact, there are many more kinds of weapons that have appeared which are better than this, such as laser guided weapons. So the government can reduce the use of GBU-31 or decrease production.

2. There are 98,000 conventional reservists of USMC (United States Marine Corps) in the US. And among these people, 40,000 need more training and have less experience. For these people, the government spends above $160 million every year. So the government could reduce the training of Selected Marine Corps Reserve to save money and put the money in higher education aid.

3.The Joint Strike Fighter F-35 program costs from $182 million to $299 million per plane. The whole program cost $400-billion, the most expensive ever. Analyst James Joyner’s report shows that although a joint approach has the potential to lower costs by pooling RDT&E resources and increasing production runs, “joint aircraft programs have not saved overall LCC compared with single-service aircraft programs.” This joint program caused a huge loss, we can’t make this kind of mistakes again and again.

4. Since 1984, there have been above 250 official satellites that have been shot to sky. Typically, each single satellite needs more than $500 million from production to launching, including production cost, rocket production cost, expense of launching and maintenance. Also, there are some satellites that fail which are definitely wasting resources. Through the research, we learned that America launched 12 satellites in the last 2 years for communication purposes. 3 of them are in military use. That is too much because the commercial satellites can assume dual-use function. The federal government could decrease the number of communication satellites next year.

5. Focus more on defending U.S. rather than “invest” too much money to be the world “police”. For example, we joined the war between Afghanistan and Iraq. America spent $200 billion per year at their peak into this war. According to Barney Frank’s report : “over past ten-year period, we can reduce the base budget by approximately $1 trillion while maintaining more than enough military strength to fully protect our security and those of our allies that genuinely need help because they are too poor and weak in the face of powerful enemies.” If we reduce the number of wars we join, we can save a lot of money to reduce college tuition.


Our goal is to reach 10,000 signatures within 30 days, then the government will reply to us and the government may make some changes and put more funding toward college tuition. If you agree with our petition, please sign it and share it with others. Thank you.


5/21/2014

Students from The Putney School, VT

Shutong Liu

Fanpu Liu



Citation:

Wikipedia contributors. "Barney Frank." Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia, 4 May. 2014. Web. 14 May. 2014.”

"The New Mandate on Defense." Democracy Journal. Web. 16 May 2014.

"GI Bill Tuition Fairness Act of 2013." Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation, 05 June 2014. Web. 16 May 2014.

"World Military Spending." - Global Issues. Web. 15 May 2014.

"Military Budget of the United States." Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation, 05 Nov. 2014. Web. 16 May 2014.

"World Military Spending." - Global Issues. Web. 15 May 2014.

"Federal Spending: Where Does the Money Go." National Priorities Project. Web. 16 May 2014.

"Military Budget of the United States." Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation, 05 Nov. 2014. Web. 16 May 2014.

"Center on Budget and Policy Priorities." Policy Basics: Where Do Our Federal Tax Dollars Go? —. Web. 15 May 2014.

"Higher Education Subsidies." Downsizing the Federal Government. Web. 16 May 2014.

"Center on Budget and Policy Priorities." Recent Deep State Higher Education Cuts May Harm Students and the Economy for Years to Come —. Web. 16 May 2014.

"Cost of National Security." National Priorities Project. Web. 14 May 2014.

"Answers To the Top Marine Corps Questions | Military.com." Answers To the Top Marine Corps Questions | Military.com. Web. 16 May 2014.

"List of USA Satellites." Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation, 05 July 2014. Web. 16 May 2014.


Updates

May 22, 2014

The government is finally feeling the heat from thousands of people who are sick of paying for bombs instead of classrooms. We have enough momentum now to force these politicians to explain why they prioritize excessive weapons production over the futures of students. Keep the pressure on because we are not going to let them ignore this any longer.

6 Comments

J
Jessica Rahman
12 years ago Featured

so tired of working two jobs just to cover my tuition. give us a chance to succeed.

R
Robert Ward
12 years ago Featured

invest in the future not just the pentagon. it is time to stop the endless spending on bombs.

D
David Collins
12 years ago Featured

Ridiculous how much we spend on war machines while kids cant afford classes. Priorities are totally backwards.

S
Sarah Alvarez
12 years ago Featured

We have way too many weapons and not enough smart people who can actually lead this country. Cut the spending!

M
Mike Shaw
12 years ago Featured

my student loans are going to follow me to the grave. this is crazy.

A
Amanda Reyes
12 years ago Featured

Finally someone said it. College shouldnt cost a fortune.

Help this petition grow

Share it with friends to help reach 100 signatures.

Your share link

Share directly