Petition to Address Year Back 2022 & 2023 batch (2025-2026 Academic year)
2,518 Comments
R
Rejin Rajesh
1 year ago
Please consider promoting the 22–23 batch without a year back. Many students have faced challenges beyond their control during that academic period.It would be more fair to assess the 22–23 batch with leniency due to academic disruptions and mental health challenges many faced during that time.
A year back could severely affect students' careers and morale. Alternative academic solutions should be explored for the 22–23 batch.
M
Mohammed alfin ks
1 year ago
Please consider promoting the 22–23 batch without a year back. Many students have faced challenges beyond their control during that academic period.It would be more fair to assess the 22–23 batch with leniency due to academic disruptions and mental health challenges many faced during that time.
A year back could severely affect students' careers and morale. Alternative academic solutions should be explored for the 22–23 batch.
A
Athira S Nair
1 year ago
Please consider promoting the 22–23 batch without a year back. Many students have faced challenges beyond their control during that academic period.It would be more fair to assess the 22–23 batch with leniency due to academic disruptions and mental health challenges many faced during that time.
A year back could severely affect students' careers and morale. Alternative academic solutions should be explored for the 22–23 batch.
G
Gowtham G
1 year ago
Sir Please remove year back for 2019 scheme students
N
Navaneeeth krishna
1 year ago
M
S
Shehzinakmal
1 year ago
Back of year back
B
Blesson
1 year ago
Boycott year back
A
ADARSH VINOD
1 year ago
Remove year back from 2019 schem
R
Rejin Rajesh
1 year ago
Kindly requesting to avoid 2019 scheme year back system
T
Tejas Kumar j
1 year ago
Kindly I request for the removal of year back system for 2022and 2023 batch (2019scheme)
A
Anonymous
1 year ago
No need year back
D
Devika M
1 year ago
Due to lack of time and proper exam schedule ,we were not able to clear the exams. Please concern about our situations
A
Anonymous
1 year ago
Please cancel yearback
A
Abhijith
1 year ago
Plzz cancel year back... We 2019 scheme studends face a severe problem. It make as tense and we cannot focus on out studies. It incrrase our stresss.
S
Saptha mk
1 year ago
could not meet the minimum credit/grade requirements to progress to the next academic year.
I acknowledge my shortcomings and assure you that I am now in a better position, both mentally and physically, to continue my studies with full dedication and hard work. I have taken concrete steps to improve my circumstances and am determined to avoid such setbacks in the future.
I humbly request you to kindly consider my case and grant me a year back so that I may continue my education. I am fully committed to making the most of this opportunity and regaining my academic standing.
A
Anand
1 year ago
Remove year back system for 2019 scheme
M
Muhammed badusha
1 year ago
Foolsktu
A
Anandu M nair
1 year ago
Take out year back from 2023 batch from 2019 scheme
R
Rinto Mathew
1 year ago
To
The Honorable Vice-Chancellor,
APJ Abdul Kalam Technological University (KTU),
Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala.
Subject: Request for reconsideration and exemption from the yearback system for affected students due to academic and administrative challenges.
Respected Sir/Madam,
We, the undersigned students of KTU, respectfully submit this petition to request a reconsideration of the yearback policy being enforced on certain batches. The implementation of this policy, under the current academic and practical circumstances, is unjust and harmful to the affected students’ academic careers and mental well-being. We wish to bring the following critical concerns to your kind attention:
1. COVID-19 Impact on Learning:
The current S6 students belong to the batch that faced two consecutive academic years of online learning due to the COVID-19 pandemic. These students were deprived of proper in-person classes during their foundational semesters (S1–S4), leading to severe gaps in understanding key subjects. This has had a lasting impact on their academic performance.
2. Yearback Implementation Confusion for S4 Students:
In the case of S4 students, if the yearback rule is strictly implemented, they will face a situation where they may be shifted to a new academic scheme (possibly the 2024 scheme). This shift is highly disruptive, as it will force students to adapt to an entirely different curriculum midway through their education, which is neither practical nor fair.
3. Unfair Discrepancy with the 2019 Batch:
The 2019 admission batch, despite facing similar or lesser academic difficulties, was not subjected to the yearback policy. Applying it now to current students, who dealt with more intense disruptions due to the pandemic, shows inconsistency in the university’s decisions and creates a sense of injustice.
4. Lack of Clear Official Circular on Yearback:
The university has not issued a comprehensive and transparent circular regarding the implementation
Please consider promoting the 22–23 batch without a year back. Many students have faced challenges beyond their control during that academic period.It would be more fair to assess the 22–23 batch with leniency due to academic disruptions and mental health challenges many faced during that time. A year back could severely affect students' careers and morale. Alternative academic solutions should be explored for the 22–23 batch.
Please consider promoting the 22–23 batch without a year back. Many students have faced challenges beyond their control during that academic period.It would be more fair to assess the 22–23 batch with leniency due to academic disruptions and mental health challenges many faced during that time. A year back could severely affect students' careers and morale. Alternative academic solutions should be explored for the 22–23 batch.
Please consider promoting the 22–23 batch without a year back. Many students have faced challenges beyond their control during that academic period.It would be more fair to assess the 22–23 batch with leniency due to academic disruptions and mental health challenges many faced during that time. A year back could severely affect students' careers and morale. Alternative academic solutions should be explored for the 22–23 batch.
Sir Please remove year back for 2019 scheme students
M
Back of year back
Boycott year back
Remove year back from 2019 schem
Kindly requesting to avoid 2019 scheme year back system
Kindly I request for the removal of year back system for 2022and 2023 batch (2019scheme)
No need year back
Due to lack of time and proper exam schedule ,we were not able to clear the exams. Please concern about our situations
Please cancel yearback
Plzz cancel year back... We 2019 scheme studends face a severe problem. It make as tense and we cannot focus on out studies. It incrrase our stresss.
could not meet the minimum credit/grade requirements to progress to the next academic year. I acknowledge my shortcomings and assure you that I am now in a better position, both mentally and physically, to continue my studies with full dedication and hard work. I have taken concrete steps to improve my circumstances and am determined to avoid such setbacks in the future. I humbly request you to kindly consider my case and grant me a year back so that I may continue my education. I am fully committed to making the most of this opportunity and regaining my academic standing.
Remove year back system for 2019 scheme
Foolsktu
Take out year back from 2023 batch from 2019 scheme
To The Honorable Vice-Chancellor, APJ Abdul Kalam Technological University (KTU), Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala. Subject: Request for reconsideration and exemption from the yearback system for affected students due to academic and administrative challenges. Respected Sir/Madam, We, the undersigned students of KTU, respectfully submit this petition to request a reconsideration of the yearback policy being enforced on certain batches. The implementation of this policy, under the current academic and practical circumstances, is unjust and harmful to the affected students’ academic careers and mental well-being. We wish to bring the following critical concerns to your kind attention: 1. COVID-19 Impact on Learning: The current S6 students belong to the batch that faced two consecutive academic years of online learning due to the COVID-19 pandemic. These students were deprived of proper in-person classes during their foundational semesters (S1–S4), leading to severe gaps in understanding key subjects. This has had a lasting impact on their academic performance. 2. Yearback Implementation Confusion for S4 Students: In the case of S4 students, if the yearback rule is strictly implemented, they will face a situation where they may be shifted to a new academic scheme (possibly the 2024 scheme). This shift is highly disruptive, as it will force students to adapt to an entirely different curriculum midway through their education, which is neither practical nor fair. 3. Unfair Discrepancy with the 2019 Batch: The 2019 admission batch, despite facing similar or lesser academic difficulties, was not subjected to the yearback policy. Applying it now to current students, who dealt with more intense disruptions due to the pandemic, shows inconsistency in the university’s decisions and creates a sense of injustice. 4. Lack of Clear Official Circular on Yearback: The university has not issued a comprehensive and transparent circular regarding the implementation
Remove year back