Petition to Address Year Back 2022 & 2023 batch (2025-2026 Academic year)

Pls remove year back system this yr

Petition to Reconsider the Implementation of the Yearback System for KTU Students To The Honorable Vice-Chancellor, APJ Abdul Kalam Technological University (KTU), Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala. Subject: Request for reconsideration and exemption from the yearback system for affected students due to academic and administrative challenges. Respected Sir/Madam, We, the undersigned students of KTU, respectfully submit this petition to request a reconsideration of the yearback policy being enforced on certain batches. The implementation of this policy, under the current academic and practical circumstances, is unjust and harmful to the affected students’ academic careers and mental well-being. We wish to bring the following critical concerns to your kind attention: ⸻ 1. COVID-19 Impact on Learning: The current S6 students belong to the batch that completed their Plus One and Plus Two during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic, through online classes. These students entered engineering college without a proper foundation, and their early semesters in college (S1–S4) were also largely online. This led to severe learning gaps in core subjects, which has had a lasting impact on their academic performance. 2. Yearback Implementation Confusion for S4 Students: In the case of S4 students, if the yearback rule is strictly implemented, they will face a situation where they may be shifted to a new academic scheme (possibly the 2024 scheme). This shift is highly disruptive, as it will force students to adapt to an entirely different curriculum midway through their education, which is neither practical nor fair. 3. Unfair Discrepancy with the 2019 Batch: The 2019 admission batch, despite facing similar or lesser academic difficulties, was not subjected to the yearback policy. Applying it now to current students, who dealt with more intense disruptions due to the pandemic, shows inconsistency in the university’s decisions and creates a sense of injustice.

Remove year back system for 2019 scheme students because the pressure of repeating subjects and catching up with coursework can lead to increased stress and anxiety.

Please remove yearback

Remove the cradit system

Please remove year back

Please remove year back system for 2019 Scheme

Anxiety about yearback is really stressfull .not even able to study for exam properly

Remove Yearback or Consider April-May-June Supplementary results

Please cancel this year back

Pls remove the year bacj system

Take back year back system

Please give some time. Losing intrest in living nowadays Please help

Kindly avoid the credit system for us,as we are final year students of 2019 scheme 2022 batch we have only nearly 40 credits

Kindly requesting to remove the year back As the valuation where very though and although the supplementary result are been too late.

As of current academics and the calender followed I believe it is not helpful for university to go with yearback .please do consider us

Remove yearback

Petition to Reconsider the Implementation of the Yearback System for KTU Students To The Honorable Vice-Chancellor, APJ Abdul Kalam Technological University (KTU), Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala. Subject: Request for reconsideration and exemption from the yearback system for affected students due to academic and administrative challenges. Respected Sir/Madam, We, the undersigned students of KTU, respectfully submit this petition to request a reconsideration of the yearback policy being enforced on certain batches. The implementation of this policy, under the current academic and practical circumstances, is unjust and harmful to the affected students’ academic careers and mental well-being. We wish to bring the following critical concerns to your kind attention: ⸻ 1. COVID-19 Impact on Learning: The current S6 students belong to the batch that completed their Plus One and Plus Two during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic, through online classes. These students entered engineering college without a proper foundation, and their early semesters in college (S1–S4) were also largely online. This led to severe learning gaps in core subjects, which has had a lasting impact on their academic performance. 2. Yearback Implementation Confusion for S4 Students: In the case of S4 students, if the yearback rule is strictly implemented, they will face a situation where they may be shifted to a new academic scheme (possibly the 2024 scheme). This shift is highly disruptive, as it will force students to adapt to an entirely different curriculum midway through their education, which is neither practical nor fair. 3. Unfair Discrepancy with the 2019 Batch: The 2019 admission batch, despite facing similar or lesser academic difficulties, was not subjected to the yearback policy. Applying it now to current students, who dealt with more intense disruptions due to the pandemic, shows inconsistency in the university’s decisions and creates a sense of injustice.

Please avoid the year back system for 2019 last scheme students

Petition to Reconsider the Implementation of the Yearback System for KTU Students To The Honorable Vice-Chancellor, APJ Abdul Kalam Technological University (KTU), Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala. Subject: Request for reconsideration and exemption from the yearback system for affected students due to academic and administrative challenges. Respected Sir/Madam, We, the undersigned students of KTU, respectfully submit this petition to request a reconsideration of the yearback policy being enforced on certain batches. The implementation of this policy, under the current academic and practical circumstances, is unjust and harmful to the affected students’ academic careers and mental well-being. We wish to bring the following critical concerns to your kind attention: ⸻ 1. COVID-19 Impact on Learning: The current S6 students belong to the batch that completed their Plus One and Plus Two during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic, through online classes. These students entered engineering college without a proper foundation, and their early semesters in college (S1–S4) were also largely online. This led to severe learning gaps in core subjects, which has had a lasting impact on their academic performance. 2. Yearback Implementation Confusion for S4 Students: In the case of S4 students, if the yearback rule is strictly implemented, they will face a situation where they may be shifted to a new academic scheme (possibly the 2024 scheme). This shift is highly disruptive, as it will force students to adapt to an entirely different curriculum midway through their education, which is neither practical nor fair. 3. Unfair Discrepancy with the 2019 Batch: The 2019 admission batch, despite facing similar or lesser academic difficulties, was not subjected to the yearback policy. Applying it now to current students, who dealt with more intense disruptions due to the pandemic, shows inconsistency in the university’s decisions and creates a sense of injustice.