This petition is in response to the Greyson's Jockey Club’s Welfare and
Safety Summit committee (WSS), and others, efforts and call to discontinue ASTM
F08.28 subcommittee’s efforts to help produce standards to aid in the safety of
riders, horses, and other animals. This ASTM subcommittee is looking at all
areas of equestrian footings; not just the racing industry. We question their
(WSS’s) concerns as we feel ASTM F08.28 efforts will only help in safety and
performance for all. To limit any help in
promoting safe, consistent, and well-performing footing for the benefit of riders,
animals, and spectators will only be a
disservice to them and to the people who maintain the surface for them. Please
sign the attached petition in support of keeping the ASTM F08.28 Equestrian
Surfaces subcommittee, to be available as a symbol of support in their efforts to produce standards for
improved equestrian footing surfaces.
We, speaking for the people signed below, have known of the efforts of Mr.
Michael DePew and the efforts of the F08.28 subcommittee to advance our
position and credibility as Race Track & Arena Superintendents (RTAS). The
ASTM F08.28 subcommittee was formed several years ago in response to a campaign
of industry support and a request which was directed to ASTM at that time. We believe that the ASTM is the proper
platform to present nomenclature, testing procedures, and other footing
standards. We (RTAS) are the people that have been charged with actually
providing and maintaining these surfaces with very little assistance for many
years. There is a great wealth of knowledge in the RTAS, but it is undocumented
and hard to come by as more of the vintage superintendents are retiring and
leaving the industry (ie… Mike Young, Ted Malloy, Butch Lear, George
McDermott). Many more will be leaving soon such as Richard Tedesco, Tony
Hernandez, and Bob Kaiser! Very few of these credible superintendents have been
asked to participate, or even talked with. Our industry has no national
leadership and proper representation that has some bite in its bark. We have a
loose, unorganized, and informal association through the NTRA but we as
superintendents do not have an independent voice to speak out on international
or even national issues. The Greyson’s Jockey Club (WSS) is a great committee
as is the NTRA Safety and Integrity Alliance, and several track superintendents
are a part of these committees. But, the
WSS has been working for several years and has yet been unable to provide some
sort of standard in relation to track profile specifications (nothing on other
equestrian disciplines), nor for simple management tools for testing/evaluating
good and bad footing conditions. A few white pages report/s, that while
educational, did not produce any viable solutions, after the expenditure of
thousands of dollars, is all that has been presented. Only a recent white pages (RSTL Bulletin #4)
to indicate the limitations of the GoingStick for turf track assessment, also
being produced. Scientific data (data collection and research) is most
definitely needed but at what expense, and how long will it take? The very
things we work with on a daily basis are not considered relevant, until a
rider, or horse goes down on national television. Then a committee is formed to
reinvent the wheel??
We have an unbiased forum, the ASTM.
This subcommittee was originally formed by an industry campaign (mostly
from track-footings maintenance personnel/interests) calling for it, and now
some other segments of the industry are seeking to veto this effort by calling
for disbanding of the F08.28 subcommittee. The ASTM is particularly organized
in operation and structure to sift through the language, social barriers, and
has no agenda other than to assist, and maintain safety within our industry;
through the standards development process.
A process which is recognized by ISO, ANSI, and other international
standards organizations as well. A
process which WSS and other similar efforts cannot immolate. Instead of obstructive efforts, the WSS should
instead be constructive and supportive by proposing, drafting, and submitting
proposed standards for ASTM balloting. We welcome and encourage all interested
parties to participate, and collaborate with the ASTM F08.28 subcommittee, so
everyone can benefit.
Please do not dissolve the most recognizable committee that is working for
RTAS!
(Names
and affiliations are private and considered confidential information for ASTM and are not to be disclosed to any other parties.)
Info
on subcommittee-http://www.astm.org/COMMIT/SUBCOMMIT/F0828.htm
Info on membership/joining-http://www.astm.org/MEMBERSHIP/MemTypes.htm
Please note that one does not need to be an ASTM-member to participate in an
ASTM task group and standards development.
Please note the rise in published concerns from groups like PETA, etc. If we endorse and practice safe, consistent practices, we may be able to minimize these groups impact on our industry.