I support option A. Based on the information I've read here and on the BCPS website, this seems to be the only option of the two that supports the goals outlined by BCPS. I hope that the best interests of ALL students is taken into consideration, not just the interests of a select few.
T
Tammy Gray
12 years ago
I support Option A.
D
Dhammika DeSilva
12 years ago
I support option A
C
Carol Fanshaw
12 years ago
I support option A.
C
Carol Martin
12 years ago
I support option A
G
Gerald Dougherty
12 years ago
Option A meets the redistricting goals the closest and will best provide a balance of demographics and economic mix at all the schools within the study.
M
Meg Dougherty
12 years ago
Why would we raise the current FARM% at a school that is already double any in the area and is beyond maxed on resources?
K
Kathleen Zungailia
12 years ago
Why would we raise the current FARM% at a school that is already double any in the area and is beyond maxed on resources?
petition for option A
Y
I support option A
I support Option A.
Option A
option A
Hace
Please keep our community together!
I support OPTION A
I support OPTION A
Concerned resident.
Greg
I support option A. Based on the information I've read here and on the BCPS website, this seems to be the only option of the two that supports the goals outlined by BCPS. I hope that the best interests of ALL students is taken into consideration, not just the interests of a select few.
I support Option A.
I support option A
I support option A.
I support option A
Option A meets the redistricting goals the closest and will best provide a balance of demographics and economic mix at all the schools within the study.
Why would we raise the current FARM% at a school that is already double any in the area and is beyond maxed on resources?
Why would we raise the current FARM% at a school that is already double any in the area and is beyond maxed on resources?