Petition for Health Canada and the IOM to Re-evaluate Vitamin D Guidelines
4,434 Comments
J
James
11 years ago
Please reevaluate
J
James
11 years ago
Please reevaluate
A
Anonymous
11 years ago
I knew when the data was published for vitamin D that 600 IU was not enough. At 220lbs, I have take at least 10,000 IU per day plus whatever I get from other sources to reach 60ng/ml
M
Mark Pegram
11 years ago
I knew when the data was published for vitamin D that 600 IU was not enough. At 220lbs, I have take at least 10,000 IU per day plus whatever I get from other sources to reach 60ng/ml
C
Christa Bateman
11 years ago
Regardless of the "recommendations", we should have the right to consume the amount best for US. The vitamin D I order is, as we speak, held in Canadian customs and will most likely be sent back AGAIN. Why? Because it's above the "recommended" daily intake. I know my body and I know whats best for it, NOT the governement!
C
Christa Bateman
11 years ago
Regardless of the "recommendations", we should have the right to consume the amount best for US. The vitamin D I order is, as we speak, held in Canadian customs and will most likely be sent back AGAIN. Why? Because it's above the "recommended" daily intake. I know my body and I know whats best for it, NOT the governement!
R
Rose Sakamoto
11 years ago
I fully endorse that we need to Clarify this issue.
R
Rose Sakamoto
11 years ago
I fully endorse that we need to Clarify this issue.
S
stacy lundblad
11 years ago
Need more Vit D3!
S
stacy lundblad
11 years ago
Need more Vit D3!
E
Evan Ignatov
11 years ago
The 600 IU/day Vitamin D recommendation puts people's health at risk. Please reevaluate it.
E
Evan Ignatov
11 years ago
The 600 IU/day Vitamin D recommendation puts people's health at risk. Please reevaluate it.
R
Robert Vogel
11 years ago
you need to fix this!
R
Robert Vogel
11 years ago
you need to fix this!
V
Violet Sunderland
11 years ago
My own experience is proof that the RDA for vitamin D is wrong. This calculation needs to be re-addressed immediately.
V
Violet Sunderland
11 years ago
My own experience is proof that the RDA for vitamin D is wrong. This calculation needs to be re-addressed immediately.
K
Kathleen McClaine
11 years ago
Everyone's needs is different, that is why it is necessary to have your vitamin D level checked at least twice a year and adjust the dose accordingly.
K
Kathleen McClaine
11 years ago
Everyone's needs is different, that is why it is necessary to have your vitamin D level checked at least twice a year and adjust the dose accordingly.
F
Francis
11 years ago
Trying to change flawed policy. We'd better have a lot of patience.
F
Francis
11 years ago
Trying to change flawed policy. We'd better have a lot of patience.
Please reevaluate
Please reevaluate
I knew when the data was published for vitamin D that 600 IU was not enough. At 220lbs, I have take at least 10,000 IU per day plus whatever I get from other sources to reach 60ng/ml
I knew when the data was published for vitamin D that 600 IU was not enough. At 220lbs, I have take at least 10,000 IU per day plus whatever I get from other sources to reach 60ng/ml
Regardless of the "recommendations", we should have the right to consume the amount best for US. The vitamin D I order is, as we speak, held in Canadian customs and will most likely be sent back AGAIN. Why? Because it's above the "recommended" daily intake. I know my body and I know whats best for it, NOT the governement!
Regardless of the "recommendations", we should have the right to consume the amount best for US. The vitamin D I order is, as we speak, held in Canadian customs and will most likely be sent back AGAIN. Why? Because it's above the "recommended" daily intake. I know my body and I know whats best for it, NOT the governement!
I fully endorse that we need to Clarify this issue.
I fully endorse that we need to Clarify this issue.
Need more Vit D3!
Need more Vit D3!
The 600 IU/day Vitamin D recommendation puts people's health at risk. Please reevaluate it.
The 600 IU/day Vitamin D recommendation puts people's health at risk. Please reevaluate it.
you need to fix this!
you need to fix this!
My own experience is proof that the RDA for vitamin D is wrong. This calculation needs to be re-addressed immediately.
My own experience is proof that the RDA for vitamin D is wrong. This calculation needs to be re-addressed immediately.
Everyone's needs is different, that is why it is necessary to have your vitamin D level checked at least twice a year and adjust the dose accordingly.
Everyone's needs is different, that is why it is necessary to have your vitamin D level checked at least twice a year and adjust the dose accordingly.
Trying to change flawed policy. We'd better have a lot of patience.
Trying to change flawed policy. We'd better have a lot of patience.