Reject RUUF Latest decision. Consider patient safety, prescriber ease and development of pharmacy profession.
T
tan yin ying
10 years ago
Pls be fair to us pharmacist. Health care is no one man show.
L
Lee Jia Cheng
10 years ago
Please be thoughtful on your decision!
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
I against ruuf!
K
kathirasan
10 years ago
With this rule patients will be less informed
L
Lim Zinyee
10 years ago
Stop making malaysian Healthcare system from bad to worse. Pharmacist had such a big role in providing health care all around the world. So stop trying to edge pharmacist out. Malaysian citizens deserve a better and quality health services. This is just full of dissapointment.
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
Support dispensing seperation!
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
These RUUF is nonsense and ridiculous. Please stop this at once.
Y
Yee Shin
10 years ago
Drug compounding is NOT cooking or baking. Quality, safety, stability and some other vital factors always need to be taken in account; since pharmacists have the professional knowledges in drug preparation associated with the factors, they should be the only qualified medical practitioner that has the mandatory in drug compounding in any dosage forms and also the right of supervising pharmacy technician.
I absolutely disagree to RUUF to protect the patient's right, consumer's safety and pharmacist's profession.
D
David sankar marubali
10 years ago
I don't. Agree on the observation of pharmacist technicians can be done by others than pharmacist and as for the prescription it's a must...Why are the doctors trying to do here?
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
I against ruuf!
H
Hasdayanti Sarbini
10 years ago
Strongly disagree
R
Razlan Rajali
10 years ago
This new law only benefits the doctor and not the pharmacist. Clearly it only a way of politician to gain more support. Futhermore this new Law does not provide any improvement on pharmacy field. It is not fair as either pharmacist, doctor or nurse are part of health care provider and their should be equally treated
W
WILLIAM CHOO CHENG FEI
10 years ago
This is not reasonable.
H
Ho Siew Fung
10 years ago
RUUF 2016 is against the people's right and interest.
S
Sohbana
10 years ago
Safety of drug is not supervise by a profesional
L
Looi Seng Han
10 years ago
Amend the bill
P
Poh jia mun
10 years ago
NO TO RUUF
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
RUUF represents a backward in the progression of medical and pharmacy fields. Look at the healthcare system models at more advance countries; sadly we are regressing.
V
Vivian
10 years ago
this is not relevant at all.
RUUF shall be reject!
Reject RUUF Latest decision. Consider patient safety, prescriber ease and development of pharmacy profession.
Pls be fair to us pharmacist. Health care is no one man show.
Please be thoughtful on your decision!
I against ruuf!
With this rule patients will be less informed
Stop making malaysian Healthcare system from bad to worse. Pharmacist had such a big role in providing health care all around the world. So stop trying to edge pharmacist out. Malaysian citizens deserve a better and quality health services. This is just full of dissapointment.
Support dispensing seperation!
These RUUF is nonsense and ridiculous. Please stop this at once.
Drug compounding is NOT cooking or baking. Quality, safety, stability and some other vital factors always need to be taken in account; since pharmacists have the professional knowledges in drug preparation associated with the factors, they should be the only qualified medical practitioner that has the mandatory in drug compounding in any dosage forms and also the right of supervising pharmacy technician. I absolutely disagree to RUUF to protect the patient's right, consumer's safety and pharmacist's profession.
I don't. Agree on the observation of pharmacist technicians can be done by others than pharmacist and as for the prescription it's a must...Why are the doctors trying to do here?
I against ruuf!
Strongly disagree
This new law only benefits the doctor and not the pharmacist. Clearly it only a way of politician to gain more support. Futhermore this new Law does not provide any improvement on pharmacy field. It is not fair as either pharmacist, doctor or nurse are part of health care provider and their should be equally treated
This is not reasonable.
RUUF 2016 is against the people's right and interest.
Safety of drug is not supervise by a profesional
Amend the bill
NO TO RUUF
RUUF represents a backward in the progression of medical and pharmacy fields. Look at the healthcare system models at more advance countries; sadly we are regressing.
this is not relevant at all. RUUF shall be reject!