Please let us do our job. Can u imagine if u're not allowed to do ur own job? Its our specialty and give our rights back
S
sharil mohamed razali
10 years ago
allah
N
Noor Maziah bt Md Daud
10 years ago
Tak setuju RUUF
H
Hafizah Hadzim
10 years ago
I am a pharmacy student. As a future pharmacist, we know what we are specialised at. Please don't take that away from us. We have our rights to say NO
K
Kannan Elangovan
10 years ago
Basically this rang reduces pharmacy role in community. Pharmacy ensure more than a doctor whether the specified drug and its dose is correct or not. Pharmacy also ensure less drug wasting. If compounding and psychotic drug rights fall for non pharmacist imagine the false use of power that can occur. Many individuals will try to take advantage and make more money. Already after strict control we are going through drug immune cases nowdays. What the future of people will be if this rang is approved?It is good that only a profession handle drugs to ensure its safety. I hope everything will be considered and pharmacy rights stay as it was.
W
Wong suet cheen
10 years ago
Not protectable, n unfair
C
CHU JING XUAN
10 years ago
malaysia boleh!
K
Kwan Yoong Zheng
10 years ago
For me, double site review the medical list is better than just listening to doctor, some more left the person with no experience to judge whether what medical to patient, so who will take care of the responsibility and if let say the patient die because of the medical given by non-doctor. Pls make deeply and clear consideration. Thanks
A
Anwar azim bin abd aziz
10 years ago
Biar farmasi buat kerja dia
L
Lai June Yew
10 years ago
Only qualified pharmacist able to protect the patients rights & safety for medications.
S
satvinder singh
10 years ago
Absolutely no one other than a pharmacist should be allowed to compound pharmaceuyical preparations. Also all patients must have presciptions otherwise there is no regulation or surveillance of who takes what or who gives medications. Totally unaccepatable. And dangerous. All rules are being broken. Patients,doctors and pharmacists must be protected by proper guidelines. No one should be allowed to break this fundamental rights.
A
Anis
10 years ago
Say no to ruuf
W
We
10 years ago
Against RUUF.
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
Let the professionals handle the tasks that they are professional with. What is the function of having a pharmacy course then? I am against this.
K
Kevinraj Jayakumar
10 years ago
It is not a proper idea to be implemented.
N
Nor faezzah mohammad nasir
10 years ago
I am a pharmacist student with an ambition to serve the community. Please save our previlege.
S
Siti hajar ainee binti kamzah
10 years ago
I am agree with the rang undang-undang farmasi
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
Why would you be so kind to put away pharmacists' responsibility? Let's share the work, for the better results, and help the pharmacists to be better in this healthcare.
i reject RUUF
Please let us do our job. Can u imagine if u're not allowed to do ur own job? Its our specialty and give our rights back
allah
Tak setuju RUUF
I am a pharmacy student. As a future pharmacist, we know what we are specialised at. Please don't take that away from us. We have our rights to say NO
Basically this rang reduces pharmacy role in community. Pharmacy ensure more than a doctor whether the specified drug and its dose is correct or not. Pharmacy also ensure less drug wasting. If compounding and psychotic drug rights fall for non pharmacist imagine the false use of power that can occur. Many individuals will try to take advantage and make more money. Already after strict control we are going through drug immune cases nowdays. What the future of people will be if this rang is approved?It is good that only a profession handle drugs to ensure its safety. I hope everything will be considered and pharmacy rights stay as it was.
Not protectable, n unfair
malaysia boleh!
For me, double site review the medical list is better than just listening to doctor, some more left the person with no experience to judge whether what medical to patient, so who will take care of the responsibility and if let say the patient die because of the medical given by non-doctor. Pls make deeply and clear consideration. Thanks
Biar farmasi buat kerja dia
Only qualified pharmacist able to protect the patients rights & safety for medications.
Absolutely no one other than a pharmacist should be allowed to compound pharmaceuyical preparations. Also all patients must have presciptions otherwise there is no regulation or surveillance of who takes what or who gives medications. Totally unaccepatable. And dangerous. All rules are being broken. Patients,doctors and pharmacists must be protected by proper guidelines. No one should be allowed to break this fundamental rights.
Say no to ruuf
Against RUUF.
Let the professionals handle the tasks that they are professional with. What is the function of having a pharmacy course then? I am against this.
It is not a proper idea to be implemented.
I am a pharmacist student with an ambition to serve the community. Please save our previlege.
I am agree with the rang undang-undang farmasi
Why would you be so kind to put away pharmacists' responsibility? Let's share the work, for the better results, and help the pharmacists to be better in this healthcare.
M'sia have to stop going backwards