This is very contradicting when everyone is trying to reduce the drug abuse and at the same time, you allow people to get whatever dangerous drugs they need (or they WANT) without prescription. This is just pure ridiculous.
A
Andy ong kang thy
10 years ago
Pharmacist is the one who learn more related to drugs compared to others profession. So i think is reasonable to hire a person who is really expert on it for the benefit of public health.
T
Teebashini Handi
10 years ago
This is absurd. So far none of the government agency reveal how many medication error are happening and how many people are facing permanent damage or even death. Even this is causing wastage of money which can be used for more useful purpose. Why have pharmacist if they don't play a role in Healthcare. Learn from more developed country.
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
Totally against pharmacy practice. Where is pharmacist's right?
Y
Yong Weng Yee
10 years ago
RUUF is not protecting our rights after all.
C
Chew Meow Chen
10 years ago
Protect the right, protect the life!!
T
Tusvendran Pillai
10 years ago
we dont support RUUF
Y
Yap Kah Foo
10 years ago
This is just too unfair to the pharmacist.
H
Hurin nazahah bt roslan
10 years ago
For the future's sake
K
Khor Chiaw Yien
10 years ago
RUUF had deprived the professional qualifications of pharmacists.
N
NG ZHENG KEONG
10 years ago
I cannot accept RUUF!
M
Muhammad Amirul Asyraf bin Noh
10 years ago
Not sure why is it called pharmacy act if most of it involves taking a lot of pharmacists' duties and responsibilities away from them.
Y
Yong Yin Ling
10 years ago
I am a pharmacist in training. We ,pharmacy students ,study 4 years hard to master the knowledge on drugs to provide a better healthcare service to the public . We deserve more respect in our profession in dealing with drugs .I reject RUUF
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
Pharmacy student.
H
Hana rozita binti hussein
10 years ago
No to ruuf
S
Sherman Keah
10 years ago
RUUF is absolutely a NO-NO!
A
Alicia
10 years ago
Dispensing rights aside, these statements do make me wonder if RUUF is made with the intention of safeguarding the people's health and safety or if there's another agenda behind it.
UNFAIR FOR PHARMACIST AND FOR FUTURE SAKE
This is very contradicting when everyone is trying to reduce the drug abuse and at the same time, you allow people to get whatever dangerous drugs they need (or they WANT) without prescription. This is just pure ridiculous.
Pharmacist is the one who learn more related to drugs compared to others profession. So i think is reasonable to hire a person who is really expert on it for the benefit of public health.
This is absurd. So far none of the government agency reveal how many medication error are happening and how many people are facing permanent damage or even death. Even this is causing wastage of money which can be used for more useful purpose. Why have pharmacist if they don't play a role in Healthcare. Learn from more developed country.
Totally against pharmacy practice. Where is pharmacist's right?
RUUF is not protecting our rights after all.
Protect the right, protect the life!!
we dont support RUUF
This is just too unfair to the pharmacist.
For the future's sake
RUUF had deprived the professional qualifications of pharmacists.
I cannot accept RUUF!
Not sure why is it called pharmacy act if most of it involves taking a lot of pharmacists' duties and responsibilities away from them.
I am a pharmacist in training. We ,pharmacy students ,study 4 years hard to master the knowledge on drugs to provide a better healthcare service to the public . We deserve more respect in our profession in dealing with drugs .I reject RUUF
Pharmacy student.
No to ruuf
RUUF is absolutely a NO-NO!
Dispensing rights aside, these statements do make me wonder if RUUF is made with the intention of safeguarding the people's health and safety or if there's another agenda behind it.
I do not support the latest RUUF draft.
I do not agree