Give patients their right to decide whether to go to a community pharmacy or to get it from the clinic
T
Toh CHeah Qi
10 years ago
Please respect pharmacist role
L
LIM PEI GIN
10 years ago
Does the authorities really feel this is the best solution for the peoe!??!!I really hope the authorities to reconsider about this new act because this does not bring any benefits to the people but threatening the health of the people. Healthcare profession is not a one man show and i believe doctors workload is overload. For the sake of the people, please reject RUUF!!
T
Terry chow
10 years ago
Strongly against this biased RUUF
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
This is ridiculous.
L
Lay Kai Jie
10 years ago
This is so stupid.
S
Soh Wee Teng
10 years ago
Pharmacists are the trained drug experts to deal with all the drugs. They are capable of doing the jobs and the best patient care comes from the teamwork from different healthcare professionals!
F
Foo Swee Yen
10 years ago
Public should have right to get more precise information from pharmacist
N
Nizam Ghani
10 years ago
Saya membantah cadangan draf ini.
T
Tiong Hui Ping
10 years ago
Patient's safety should be put on the first place.
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
Reject RUUF
J
JC
10 years ago
Prescription should be issued and stated clearly
F
Felicia Lau
10 years ago
MOH should approach the review of the RUUF through a risk-based analysis instead of yielding to the 'wants' or 'convenience' of selected group. It is a waste of 20 years effort.
N
Ng Boon Heng
10 years ago
1. Issuance of prescriptions to patients is not compulsory, is only when patient request for it.
Implications: Patients/ consumers in Malaysia generally will not question the judgement of the doctors. We trust them and that is why we let them decide the best for us. However, patients should be given a fair option to decide whether where to get their supply of medication after seeing the doctor. Without a valid prescription, patients are “forced” to keep getting their supply from the clinic and this has denied the basic rights as consumers, the right to choose. The law is supposed to protect the people’s right, not provide a loophole for the professionals to play around with their authority.
2. It is not mandatory to state indications on prescriptions
A prescription is a message from a doctor to a pharmacist to request the pharmacist to dispense the medication to the patients. It is also the duty and role of the pharmacists to counter check and screen the prescriptions before dispense the medication. Without the indications stated on prescription, pharmacists are unable to perform their duty and deliver the best service to the patients. How are we supposed to expect that the medications that are supplied to us are correct and safe?
3. Pharmaceutical Compounding can be performed by non-pharmacists
Compounding is a specialisation in pharmacist to prepare a customized and specialized preparation for the patient. This is especially important when more and more diseases needed to be treated using personalized medication. It is something that has to be done by someone who has been formally trained, who are the pharmacists. It is not as simple as mixing two types of cream available in the market and compound a new cream. By mixing the wrong ingredient or mix without proper calculation, the results can be fatal. Why should we risk ourselves by allowing people who are not trained to do compounding?
4. Psychotropic medicines can be dispensed by prescribers
Psychotropi
C
Chua Yee Yin
10 years ago
The law should be protect people not increase the rise of danger on us. This is not fair and will cause more problems.
N
nur hidayu bt idris
10 years ago
the proposed law is putting patient at risk and abusing of drugs especially psychotropic
J
Jacky Chen
10 years ago
We have the right to know what medicine to take
T
Tee Ming Ming
10 years ago
Healthcare is never a one-man show, we should work towards holistic care comprises of all healthcare professionals in their expertise area for the sake of patient health. RUUF is obviously some so-called undang-undang to protect the benefits of dr only! It is really disappointed to see our malaysia health care is going backward again!
N
Noor Hanisah Bt Abd Halim
10 years ago
Justice means putting something in it's place. And I against something that violates others right especially if it involves professional career jobscope. This new RUUF is obviously bias, poor taste and low since it relates to a profession that involves in community health and safe use of medication which integrity is a main priority.
Very bias and not fair
Give patients their right to decide whether to go to a community pharmacy or to get it from the clinic
Please respect pharmacist role
Does the authorities really feel this is the best solution for the peoe!??!!I really hope the authorities to reconsider about this new act because this does not bring any benefits to the people but threatening the health of the people. Healthcare profession is not a one man show and i believe doctors workload is overload. For the sake of the people, please reject RUUF!!
Strongly against this biased RUUF
This is ridiculous.
This is so stupid.
Pharmacists are the trained drug experts to deal with all the drugs. They are capable of doing the jobs and the best patient care comes from the teamwork from different healthcare professionals!
Public should have right to get more precise information from pharmacist
Saya membantah cadangan draf ini.
Patient's safety should be put on the first place.
Reject RUUF
Prescription should be issued and stated clearly
MOH should approach the review of the RUUF through a risk-based analysis instead of yielding to the 'wants' or 'convenience' of selected group. It is a waste of 20 years effort.
1. Issuance of prescriptions to patients is not compulsory, is only when patient request for it. Implications: Patients/ consumers in Malaysia generally will not question the judgement of the doctors. We trust them and that is why we let them decide the best for us. However, patients should be given a fair option to decide whether where to get their supply of medication after seeing the doctor. Without a valid prescription, patients are “forced” to keep getting their supply from the clinic and this has denied the basic rights as consumers, the right to choose. The law is supposed to protect the people’s right, not provide a loophole for the professionals to play around with their authority. 2. It is not mandatory to state indications on prescriptions A prescription is a message from a doctor to a pharmacist to request the pharmacist to dispense the medication to the patients. It is also the duty and role of the pharmacists to counter check and screen the prescriptions before dispense the medication. Without the indications stated on prescription, pharmacists are unable to perform their duty and deliver the best service to the patients. How are we supposed to expect that the medications that are supplied to us are correct and safe? 3. Pharmaceutical Compounding can be performed by non-pharmacists Compounding is a specialisation in pharmacist to prepare a customized and specialized preparation for the patient. This is especially important when more and more diseases needed to be treated using personalized medication. It is something that has to be done by someone who has been formally trained, who are the pharmacists. It is not as simple as mixing two types of cream available in the market and compound a new cream. By mixing the wrong ingredient or mix without proper calculation, the results can be fatal. Why should we risk ourselves by allowing people who are not trained to do compounding? 4. Psychotropic medicines can be dispensed by prescribers Psychotropi
The law should be protect people not increase the rise of danger on us. This is not fair and will cause more problems.
the proposed law is putting patient at risk and abusing of drugs especially psychotropic
We have the right to know what medicine to take
Healthcare is never a one-man show, we should work towards holistic care comprises of all healthcare professionals in their expertise area for the sake of patient health. RUUF is obviously some so-called undang-undang to protect the benefits of dr only! It is really disappointed to see our malaysia health care is going backward again!
Justice means putting something in it's place. And I against something that violates others right especially if it involves professional career jobscope. This new RUUF is obviously bias, poor taste and low since it relates to a profession that involves in community health and safe use of medication which integrity is a main priority.