Then u don't need pharmacist in this country..prescriber shouldn't ask d doses to pharmacist about any drugs anymore if thy hv doubt in it.
N
NURUL SYIRAIN LIYANA MOHD NAJIB
10 years ago
Please dont terminate the pharmancy department. There are a lof of people who take pharmancy as their course in university. There also will be impact in many ways so I begging you let the pharmancy department alone. Not because of economy down, think about our next generation. Use your brain to think if this could be reduce the cost
N
Nurul faizin binti Razak
10 years ago
Stop burden people with nonsense law.
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
This RUUF would rob the pharmacist scope of work
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
Don't just because of our Malaysia's economy become worst, it effect the pharmacy in hospital. Please be consider about others eventhough you don't care.
N
NORSHUHAIDA BINTI MOHD RIBZULLWA
10 years ago
I totally reject RUUF!!!
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
Do not ignore patient safety. Doctors, this is not the right way to earn more money or gain more power!
S
Sarah hasbil
10 years ago
Im against the ruuf
P
Pyh Shin
10 years ago
It endangers the right and the safety of the consumers.
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
Strictly no! As a pharmacy students, please don't do ruuf-or-whatever it was called.
G
Goh Zi yu
10 years ago
I don't agree
L
Lim Miqian
10 years ago
I hope Malaysia can improve our dispensing system but not in this way.
M
MOHD NAZMI B IBRAHIM
10 years ago
Saya sebulat suara tidak sokong akta ini. Akta ini melibatkan mampu merendahkan kerjaya sebagai seorang ahli farmasi. Pendispensan adalah hak ahli farmasi sebagai seorang yang pakar dalam bidang ubat. Seorang farmasi belaja selama 4 tahun untuk pakar dalam bidang ini tetapi apabila tamat, hak untuk farmasi di tatik dan diberi kepada orng yg x mahir dalam bidang itu. Ini sangat tidak adil. Jika doctor belaja dalam bidang kedoktoran dan setelah habis belaja, tiada siapa yg amik hak die walaupon bidang lain mampu melakukan sedemikian rupa. kenapa ianya berlaku pada bidang farnasi. Saya berharap akta ini dibatalkan dan tidak aan dilaksanankan. Saya harap agar pihak farmasi yg berada diatas dapat melakukan kerja dengan bg menjaga hak sebagai ahli farmasi. sekian
J
Joey Yeap
10 years ago
I just do not understand why would anyone want to reduce the standard of medication safety???
L
Lee Wee John
10 years ago
Evidence based medicine prescription is vital.
I need to know what I am eating, and what effects the medicine will bring to my body.
It is my basic rights, as for all other Malaysians.
P
Priya
10 years ago
Disagree!
L
Lim Wan Lin
10 years ago
No diagnosis and indications are ridiculous. We are 100 years backward if it is implemented,to the old age patients can not raise questions and doctors have all the says.
R
Richard Woon
10 years ago
Without the supervision and monitoring of certain drugs from qualified pharmacist is deplorable and cannot be allowed to prevail in this modern age where drugs and its effects or even side effects are too complicated and too complex to be able to dispense it without a qualified pharmacist. RUUF proposals should perhaps be amended in the light of the gravity of the consequences it will bring.
Consumer rights
Then u don't need pharmacist in this country..prescriber shouldn't ask d doses to pharmacist about any drugs anymore if thy hv doubt in it.
Please dont terminate the pharmancy department. There are a lof of people who take pharmancy as their course in university. There also will be impact in many ways so I begging you let the pharmancy department alone. Not because of economy down, think about our next generation. Use your brain to think if this could be reduce the cost
Stop burden people with nonsense law.
This RUUF would rob the pharmacist scope of work
Don't just because of our Malaysia's economy become worst, it effect the pharmacy in hospital. Please be consider about others eventhough you don't care.
I totally reject RUUF!!!
Do not ignore patient safety. Doctors, this is not the right way to earn more money or gain more power!
Im against the ruuf
It endangers the right and the safety of the consumers.
Strictly no! As a pharmacy students, please don't do ruuf-or-whatever it was called.
I don't agree
I hope Malaysia can improve our dispensing system but not in this way.
Saya sebulat suara tidak sokong akta ini. Akta ini melibatkan mampu merendahkan kerjaya sebagai seorang ahli farmasi. Pendispensan adalah hak ahli farmasi sebagai seorang yang pakar dalam bidang ubat. Seorang farmasi belaja selama 4 tahun untuk pakar dalam bidang ini tetapi apabila tamat, hak untuk farmasi di tatik dan diberi kepada orng yg x mahir dalam bidang itu. Ini sangat tidak adil. Jika doctor belaja dalam bidang kedoktoran dan setelah habis belaja, tiada siapa yg amik hak die walaupon bidang lain mampu melakukan sedemikian rupa. kenapa ianya berlaku pada bidang farnasi. Saya berharap akta ini dibatalkan dan tidak aan dilaksanankan. Saya harap agar pihak farmasi yg berada diatas dapat melakukan kerja dengan bg menjaga hak sebagai ahli farmasi. sekian
I just do not understand why would anyone want to reduce the standard of medication safety???
Evidence based medicine prescription is vital. I need to know what I am eating, and what effects the medicine will bring to my body. It is my basic rights, as for all other Malaysians.
Disagree!
No diagnosis and indications are ridiculous. We are 100 years backward if it is implemented,to the old age patients can not raise questions and doctors have all the says.
Without the supervision and monitoring of certain drugs from qualified pharmacist is deplorable and cannot be allowed to prevail in this modern age where drugs and its effects or even side effects are too complicated and too complex to be able to dispense it without a qualified pharmacist. RUUF proposals should perhaps be amended in the light of the gravity of the consequences it will bring.
Pharmacy student