Skip to main content

Peak View Zoning Meeting - Change Date

34 Comments

L
Laura Rustin
3 years ago

My major concern about the proposed development is about the traffic. Picture this............someone is coming down Peak View from Mary's Lake Road. They want to turn in to the new development. The first access is right off PV near Twin Drive. That requires crossing the traffic heading in the other direction on PV. That may require coming to a total stop if there is oncoming traffic. This is a recipe for disaster. The second entrance appears to be from Devon Drive. But that same car traveling on Peak View has to make a rather wide left turn where Juniper and Devon separate from PV. This is also a recipe for disaster. The potential for traffic accidents is a very real concern to me.

S
Susan Kaszynski
3 years ago

I agree with what has been stated on this petition and recommend rescheduling the meeting.

B
Bill Melton
3 years ago

Current Zoning Notificatuon in violation of Ordinance. Hold Meeting until proper Notice Given.

L
Larry Bader
3 years ago

This rezoning proposal is grossly inconsistent with the established homes in every direction for as far as the eye can see and raises a red flag to every current and future homeowner in Estes Park.

C
Charles Nugent
3 years ago Featured

The rather fragmented notice of the re-zoning activity initiated, has put affected residents in a difficult position for acquiring accurate information about the proposed rezoning or even that such a change has even been proposed! Required signage in the affected areas has not been done. Timing for the upcoming meeting creates a difficult issue for many residents considering the Holiday Season. Notice for the proposed change must be as required by the Development Code and reasonable for residents to digest and participate the proposed change. The proposed change has large impact on residents, including economic. Thus residents must be fully informed and permitted to fully participate without conflicts inherent in the Holiday season!

B
Ben Kokenge
3 years ago

I feel we were not given adequate notice to be heard, especially considering the time of year. Was this by design?

V
Vicki Papineau
3 years ago Featured

Meeting letter sent does not reference correct zoning changes — RE-1 should be E-1. Owner’s name not listed. Letter not signed by owner.

T
Tamara Scace
3 years ago

What a travesty in a beautiful neighborhood.

S
Steve Wende
3 years ago

We are seasonal residents at 641 Longs Drive. We made the substantial investment in the purchase and renovation of the property trusting in the zoning of the area. We love Estes Park and spend half the year there, but the proposed development would radically impact that area in a very negative way. The street is already quite busy in the summer and on weekends, and with the blind corner the increased traffic turning and stopping will be a danger to wildlife and people. Plus, the large number of homes in the small space will drive wildlife away and alter their living patterns.

S
Stephanie Ahrndt-Pawson
3 years ago Featured

I drive Peak View twice a day during the week for school route everyday and have not seen a sign of any notice on 685 Peakview.

S
Stephanie Ahrndt-Pawson
3 years ago Featured

Meeting is schedule the evening before school break of EPES. I have to bring my child on what should be joyous final break week to a zoning meeting scheduled 10 days before Christmas and night before final day of school in which events are planned in community

J
Jacqueline Adams
3 years ago Featured

Notifications were mailed to many residents that are out of town for the season and do not have the opportunity to respond or attend December meetings.

D
Dave Caddell
3 years ago

need more time on this, too short of notice especially this close to Christmas

C
Christy Jacobs
3 years ago

I agree there were no visibly posted signs on the property.