Change Vote - Stop Amendment - Why you should VOTE to Cancel the Referendum now!
Show your support by signing this petition now
THIS PETITION HAS BEEN CANCELLED.
ALL SIGNATURES WERE DELETED TO PROTECT THE PRIVACY OF SUPPORTERS.
WE THANK EVERYONE WHO SIGNED THE PETITION FOR YOUR SUPPORT.
ANY ADDITIONAL SIGNATURES AT THIS TIME WILL BE ACKNOWLEDGED BY EMAIL, BUT WILL BE INSTANTLY REMOVED TO PROTECT YOUR PRIVACY.
THANK YOU.
UNFORTUNATELY TIME RESTRAINTS, THE VOTING DEADLINE AND THE LACK OF SUFFICIENT SUPPORT HAS RENDERED THIS PETITION MUTE.
THE INFORMATION BELOW REMAINS AVAILABLE FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY.
Why The Petition?
READ THIS LA TIMES ARTICLE TO UNDERSTAND THE CONSEQUENCES OF THIS AMENDMENT: (Click on link below to See Article):-
The "Change Vote" Petition was against the amendment passing.
------------------------------------------------------ x -----------------------------------------------------------
The Reasons against the NEW amendment. Why?
This amendment will be a restriction on Homeowner's property rights and NOT a management system or rules to control tenant behavior. It can prevent Owners from leasing their property permanently in the future.
In fact, Two Association & Common Interest Living Experts advised: "Any Amendment to CC&Rs is a material change to YOUR property title. A new restriction, like “leasing limitations” MUST BE fully disclosed to potential buyers and can affect the value of your asset."
"You should not vote to change CC&R’s without fully understanding the LEGAL and FINANCIAL affect it will have on your property and your ownership rights."
“It is probably better to leave your CC&R’s alone.”
Dis-similarly, we have rules and guidelines for Pets and pet Owner's enforced by Management - we choose NOT to ban pets at Park Place but rather respect pet owner's rights.
Due to misleading information most Homeowner's believe that restricting the rights of existing homeowners, and not just future owners, is the ONLY way to manage tenancy. This is grossly misleading, far too penal on homeowners and does not address present tenant issues that may have incited this issue to begin with.
This amendment will have a material affect on everyone's right NOT just new or future homeowners.
Ominous by the fact that Buildings 3 and 4 already have 24% tenant occupancy, this amendment will most likely result in numerous Lawsuits against the HOA (All homeowners jointly liable and not the Board) by individuals wanting to lease their property, a right they had since the time of purchase until this amendment.
This same amendment has already triggered thousands of lawsuits causing many Homeowner Associations to seek financial Bankruptcy protection. This is one of the reasons the State of California passed into Law legislation SB 150 which takes effect January 1, 2012. The Board's attempt to pass this amendment is due to the fact that SB 150 is NOT retroactive, which will make us an exception from the Law.
Our amendment is retroactive and this many be the biggest legality issue.
The Petition states the concern and intent of homeowners to change their vote and/or to vote against the amendment. We believe a NEW amendment specifically for the control of tenants is more appropriate and should be drafted without restricting the homeowner's rights and title.
The current CC&R's state one can not change your vote. So this petition attempted to seek that the Board of Directors DO NOT OPEN BALLOTS or DO NOT COUNT the votes thereby cancelling this referendum.
All support was welcomed.
Please sign in to support to cancel the referendum. Thank you.
CLICK on Blog (Above) FOR UPDATES.
Sponsor
Homeowners Against Property Restrictions.
FOR BETTER Tenant management.
Share on Facebook
Comment
See More 0