The divided road section of Jahnke Road, from Blakemore to Chippenham Parkway, is already far too congested. Richmond's decision to allow a gasoline station at 7001 Jahnke Rd. is already an exploitive disaster for the well-being of residents. No further "development" of any kind is needed in this area.
I especially support the very logical argument promoting the use of the discussed land in such a way "that will make a desirable contribution to the welfare and safety of the entire area." A small branch library would be the wisest choice.
J
Jill Martin
1 year ago
If I could vote, a pocket park or safe student transportation pick up/drop off spot would be most beneficial.
E
Eileen Connors
1 year ago
Do Not build on this site. There is no good reason to do so.
T
Thomas Benton
1 year ago
Please don't allow this to happen.
B
Becky
1 year ago
Please do not add a hazardous building to an area that BAS OVER CROWDED ROADS. READ THE NPETOTION FOR THE REASONS. THANK YOU
K
Katie McCall
1 year ago
Featured
This proposed SUP is completely incongruent with the Planning Commission's stated purpose in CHAPTER 30-ARTICLE I, Sec. 30-100. - Purpose.
The purpose of this chapter is to adopt a comprehensive zoning plan designed to:
(1) Lessen congestion in streets.
See petition letter for details.
D
David Young
1 year ago
Strongly agree that business of this would not serve in this community best interest. Respectfully vote No
M
Mike Wood
1 year ago
Too much traffic now
K
Karen Wittich
1 year ago
The area is already dense with apartments and shouldn’t have more. This would impact schools as well as usage of roads
T
TOBY HAWLEY
1 year ago
There is sufficient housing already available. This will cause excessive traffic in an area that does not need additional congestion. Please deny the request.
B
Bill Rose
1 year ago
Not good for this neighborhood.
A
Anonymous
1 year ago
Agree
K
Karen Wormald
1 year ago
Featured
Jeopardizing access to and from Chippenham Hospital must not be compromised by retail or any density of apartments directly across the street. There are already 2 closely placed stoplights and a highway entrance ramp right there. I travel this road and it's already dangerous without another traffic surge clogging that tight section.
J
Jo Ann Myers
1 year ago
City of Richmond, we are speaking loud and clear. Please listen.
M
Micah Circe
1 year ago
This development is entirely out of character for the North Side of Jahnke at the entrance to a residential neighborhood.
The apartments are redundant based on nearby apt vacancies, the the commercial space is dangerously located at a school bus stop and across the street from a SUP for commercial & retail development.
The proper place for these types of developments are on the South side of Jahnke, near similar buildings.
B
Brian Law
1 year ago
Unsuitable for the location. Please do NOT approve this
A
Autumn Emanuel
1 year ago
Lived in the neighborhood for over 40 years. This proposed development is not a good idea for several reasons but thus the city has chosen to ignore its constituents. I’m tired of stating the reasons over and over again. Instead I’ll continue to make my voice heard at the polls.
A
Anonymous
1 year ago
Not appropriate nor wanted by the residents of this area. NO!
The divided road section of Jahnke Road, from Blakemore to Chippenham Parkway, is already far too congested. Richmond's decision to allow a gasoline station at 7001 Jahnke Rd. is already an exploitive disaster for the well-being of residents. No further "development" of any kind is needed in this area.
Ridiculous idea. Creating dangerous traffic issues!
I especially support the very logical argument promoting the use of the discussed land in such a way "that will make a desirable contribution to the welfare and safety of the entire area." A small branch library would be the wisest choice.
If I could vote, a pocket park or safe student transportation pick up/drop off spot would be most beneficial.
Do Not build on this site. There is no good reason to do so.
Please don't allow this to happen.
Please do not add a hazardous building to an area that BAS OVER CROWDED ROADS. READ THE NPETOTION FOR THE REASONS. THANK YOU
This proposed SUP is completely incongruent with the Planning Commission's stated purpose in CHAPTER 30-ARTICLE I, Sec. 30-100. - Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to adopt a comprehensive zoning plan designed to: (1) Lessen congestion in streets. See petition letter for details.
Strongly agree that business of this would not serve in this community best interest. Respectfully vote No
Too much traffic now
The area is already dense with apartments and shouldn’t have more. This would impact schools as well as usage of roads
There is sufficient housing already available. This will cause excessive traffic in an area that does not need additional congestion. Please deny the request.
Not good for this neighborhood.
Agree
Jeopardizing access to and from Chippenham Hospital must not be compromised by retail or any density of apartments directly across the street. There are already 2 closely placed stoplights and a highway entrance ramp right there. I travel this road and it's already dangerous without another traffic surge clogging that tight section.
City of Richmond, we are speaking loud and clear. Please listen.
This development is entirely out of character for the North Side of Jahnke at the entrance to a residential neighborhood. The apartments are redundant based on nearby apt vacancies, the the commercial space is dangerously located at a school bus stop and across the street from a SUP for commercial & retail development. The proper place for these types of developments are on the South side of Jahnke, near similar buildings.
Unsuitable for the location. Please do NOT approve this
Lived in the neighborhood for over 40 years. This proposed development is not a good idea for several reasons but thus the city has chosen to ignore its constituents. I’m tired of stating the reasons over and over again. Instead I’ll continue to make my voice heard at the polls.
Not appropriate nor wanted by the residents of this area. NO!