Skip to main content

Our Minister of Environment should explain how the Public will not be "disadvantaged" by Boal Car Park closing

537 Comments

D
diane
11 years ago

Minister Durkin you're a disgrace. Face the public and offer an explanation.

S
Stephen Hunter
11 years ago

An absolute disgrace. He has to explain why he is shutting it as paying for parking at the airport is to expensive.

J
julie
11 years ago

This affordable car park should be allowed to stay open.

J
James Kelly
11 years ago

Perhaps the MOE is on a retainer from the more expensive car parking service.

J
Jackie Musgrave
11 years ago

This parking is the best and very cheap

S
Sam Coates
11 years ago

Durkan is duckin !

A
Anonymous
11 years ago

This is not on certainly can't make a statement ,then refuse to answer questions .

S
Stephen McCready
11 years ago

Beggars belief. Public Enquiry time...

P
Paula FIsher
11 years ago

It's a disgrace ,no competition allowed WHY. Mr Durken. Why can't the Public have a cheaper choice ? Some one s received a backhander if you ask me .

R
Robert Lamont
11 years ago

City airport parking is a massive rip off and Boals should be allowed to compete

D
Dorothy walker
11 years ago

dont disadvantage us with this closure f

A
Anonymous
11 years ago

Let Boals do their job. Just be fair and let hard working folk run a decent business.

H
Henry Armstrong
11 years ago

Justice is fair competition

C
Christine Kerr
11 years ago

If people didn't want boals car parking services they wouldn't use it. The voice of the people is in its usage.

C
Clare Anderson
11 years ago

The paying public want and deserve a competitive market

A
Alyn McFarland
11 years ago

I wonder who is pulling the strings here. Who would you order a business to close?

R
Roisin Polly
11 years ago

Use Boal Car Park regularly (once a month for 4-5 days). Could not afford to pay City airport parking prices.

D
Declan McGrady
11 years ago

Jealousy over Boal suçcess and more cost effectiveness. Shame on you Mark H Durkan!!!!

D
Des Garland
11 years ago

I think someone should seek a judicial review into the decision

P
Peter Lyons
11 years ago

A pathetic case of private enterprise helping our population being stifled by the men on the hill.