Skip to main content

Our Minister of Environment should explain how the Public will not be "disadvantaged" by Boal Car Park closing

537 Comments

E
elaine
11 years ago

Not all of us has a wage like him to afford the riduculus parking charges at George Best airport. Another case of greedy mps.

A
Anonymous
11 years ago

Great service which I have used many times. As with any sector, competition is healthy. The airport should not be allowed to have a monopoly

A
Anonymous
11 years ago

I have used Boal several times and have found them to be reliable, convenient and affordable. It would be a disgrace if they close to support an airport monopoly!

M
Michael Connolly
11 years ago

Disgrace

R
Ryan mcnally
11 years ago

I just Boal car parking often and agree with everything they have said in above statement. We Need them

R
Robert wilson
11 years ago

Have. Used this service and found it great.Can minister explain how he allows free market competition to operate around car parking at George Best Airport?

C
Colin Ferguson
11 years ago

We have such poor leaders in government who really haven't got a clue what they are doing.

B
Brian wright
11 years ago

It's an absolute disgrace . You can not just close a business because you don't think it's needed surely that is up to the business owner to decide . Can I make money and earn a living , I think yes so I will invest my time and money and pay my taxes so I will open a business . It's ibviously needed or it wouldn't be open This is an outrage and should be taken to court

A
Anonymous
11 years ago

Justify your decision

E
Eamonn fegan
11 years ago

Your having a laugh

D
David crAwford
11 years ago

Open the fucking ikea car park you dick

A
Anonymous
11 years ago

Don't take people's jobs and livelihoods away - please serve the actual interests of people in our communities!

A
Ashley Barr
11 years ago

Running a carpark, on a purpose built carpark, is perfectly reasonable. If it wasnt needed Boals would have been out of business on its own. Let free enterprise be!

N
Niall Mckeown
11 years ago Featured

We know that politicians regularly use the boardroom at the city airport for engagements. They appear to have a cosy relationship with the senior management. This decision is another example of "policy before public interest". The whole thing stinks.

G
Gordon Buckley
11 years ago

Absolute disgrace to pressurise a good service. What happened to free enterprise. The airport rates are a scandal.

P
Peter grant
11 years ago

Money talks,

S
Stephen Lipton
11 years ago

How is reducing choice and forcing me to pay. More not disadvantageous

J
John Stewart
11 years ago

I look forward to the Minister explaining to me how I haven't been disadvantaged.

G
Glenn Wallace
11 years ago

Back handers must be bigger from the city airport..

J
John kirkwood
11 years ago

Please explain Mr Durkin