Opposed. We do not want to live near a likely to be public entertainment venue located INSIDE our neighborhood with homeowners having no control over how often and how many people/what kinds of events can be brought in throughout the year. Anyone remember the pool party fiasco?
A
Anonymous
4 years ago
This can not happen!
E
Ellie Trockman
4 years ago
See free concerts at Woodstock and Canton.
A
Anonymous
4 years ago
Don’t need my noise or traffic
J
Jeff Jackson
4 years ago
Featured
Oppose. The purpose of the HOA (per our governing documents) is to maintain common property and enforce covenants. In the documents, the club is a separate entity and is the entity that provides amenities, events and entertainment. Under the terms of the park easement agreement, HOA has deposited funds into an account jointly owned with the club. Essentially, the HOA has entered into a partnership with the club without a vote of the homeowners or changing of the governing documents.
P
Phyllis Flowers
4 years ago
Featured
I forgot to add comment when i signed earlier. Due to the total lack of transparency, I am opposed
T
Thomas G Michael
4 years ago
Oppose
A
Anonymous
4 years ago
Opposed… I need more info and a discussion around this. We all need a vote.
A
Allen Briscoe
4 years ago
I oppose the application to Amend the Bridgemill Master Plan.
A
Anonymous
4 years ago
Opposed
J
Joe Blow Bridgemill
4 years ago
I think there's a lot more low hanging fruit to go after at bridgemill. the almost unilateral disdain for ARC and their overreach comes to mind. the PR nightmare has reached critical mass when the Cascade magazine has to do damage control with this new "help you get to Yes" redirect. a story's been going around about someone needing special approval on something not even requiring ARC approval solely due to their proximity to an ARC member. (stanford experiment anyone?) lets focus on issues that are less contentious than this park thing first.
A
Al Coholic
4 years ago
Screw all the people trying to improve Bridgemill! Boooooo
L
Linda Prins
4 years ago
We don’t need to be drawing outside rif-raf to the neighborhood- gives them a way to come in and scope out our neighborhood without being detected.
B
Bruce McKamey
4 years ago
Show me the money
A
Anonymous
4 years ago
Featured
There’s already to much traffic and speeding going on and this will only add to the issue
A
Anonymous
4 years ago
I don’t want to be a part of the BM athletic association and I don’t want to support anything associated with it. I didn’t move here so I could support the things I will never use nor will my children or grandchildren ever use. Seniors are struggling and shouldn’t have to support the ones who aren’t.
L
Lauren Douglas
4 years ago
Not clear to me how this will change crowds, traffic patterns, or future dues. Honestly with 3 kids under the age of 13 we like the big field of grass. I don’t want another screen! Thank you!
V
Vincent Lienemann
· petition starter
4 years ago
Meeting starts at 630 and is at the building next to the pool - terraces. If you receive the emails from CMA it should include the link to attend remote..
A
Anonymous
4 years ago
We need more information before I can say for or against. What time is the board meeting on the 11th?
Opposed. We do not want to live near a likely to be public entertainment venue located INSIDE our neighborhood with homeowners having no control over how often and how many people/what kinds of events can be brought in throughout the year. Anyone remember the pool party fiasco?
This can not happen!
See free concerts at Woodstock and Canton.
Don’t need my noise or traffic
Oppose. The purpose of the HOA (per our governing documents) is to maintain common property and enforce covenants. In the documents, the club is a separate entity and is the entity that provides amenities, events and entertainment. Under the terms of the park easement agreement, HOA has deposited funds into an account jointly owned with the club. Essentially, the HOA has entered into a partnership with the club without a vote of the homeowners or changing of the governing documents.
I forgot to add comment when i signed earlier. Due to the total lack of transparency, I am opposed
Oppose
Opposed… I need more info and a discussion around this. We all need a vote.
I oppose the application to Amend the Bridgemill Master Plan.
Opposed
I think there's a lot more low hanging fruit to go after at bridgemill. the almost unilateral disdain for ARC and their overreach comes to mind. the PR nightmare has reached critical mass when the Cascade magazine has to do damage control with this new "help you get to Yes" redirect. a story's been going around about someone needing special approval on something not even requiring ARC approval solely due to their proximity to an ARC member. (stanford experiment anyone?) lets focus on issues that are less contentious than this park thing first.
Screw all the people trying to improve Bridgemill! Boooooo
We don’t need to be drawing outside rif-raf to the neighborhood- gives them a way to come in and scope out our neighborhood without being detected.
Show me the money
There’s already to much traffic and speeding going on and this will only add to the issue
I don’t want to be a part of the BM athletic association and I don’t want to support anything associated with it. I didn’t move here so I could support the things I will never use nor will my children or grandchildren ever use. Seniors are struggling and shouldn’t have to support the ones who aren’t.
Not clear to me how this will change crowds, traffic patterns, or future dues. Honestly with 3 kids under the age of 13 we like the big field of grass. I don’t want another screen! Thank you!
Meeting starts at 630 and is at the building next to the pool - terraces. If you receive the emails from CMA it should include the link to attend remote..
We need more information before I can say for or against. What time is the board meeting on the 11th?
opposed