Skip to main content

Opposing the Twisted Pines Campground

109 Comments

K
Kirk Chirico
5 years ago

No to this campground. Take it elsewhere.

S
Sharon Franz
5 years ago

Please keep our peaceful place peaceful

D
Diana Williams
5 years ago

I'm opposed to the campground!

D
Dave Williams
5 years ago

I am opposed to the RV Camp groung

C
Cameron Nicholl
5 years ago

Don't ruin my state

T
Troy Dutenhoeffer
5 years ago

Keep the wild, wild!!!! Too much progress and not enought open space in this state. Open space is open, developed space can never go back to open space.

S
Shelli Creech
5 years ago

Don't do this!

R
Randall West
5 years ago

Wildfires is a constant threat! locals that live here know how to act in this environment! Outsiders don’t care or have the slightest idea why we put burn bans on. They still feel that they are an exception to the rules, like shooting explosive targets, propane tanks, livestock and poaching. I live just East of were this campground is projected to be and with the prevailing winds coming out of the West. That puts a lot of private homes, Ranches and the Old Kathleen Ranch Subdivision in-line for destruction from a fast moving wildfire.

E
Eric seifert
5 years ago

One buys mountain property to get away from congestion noise and people

Z
Zacharey Green
5 years ago

My family also has property in this area and are also firmly opposed.

N
Nathan Early
5 years ago

Respect people’s property!!!

P
Patrick Barton
5 years ago

Once again, someone has the color of money in their eye.Their continued misuse of land. Stop the campground!

L
Leslie Marzano
5 years ago

With no source of water this is a very bad idea. Also it will endanger the wildlife.

V
Vanessa Ayala
5 years ago

Stop building unnecessary places for filthy humans! If anything you should tear down some campgrounds and let nature thrive.

A
Anonymous
5 years ago

Nature needs to be left as is and not disturbed.

L
Linda Rinkor
5 years ago

Impact on our volunteer fire and EMS could be overwhelming. Traffic on CR 59 and 102 will be disruptive to wildlife and environment.

T
Tammatha Shade
5 years ago

We don't need more campgrounds

D
David J Schneider
5 years ago

We barely seem to manage our current facilities, we don't need more sprawl. Put more rangers in the field first.

C
Christopher Losey
5 years ago

If the simple fact that commercial development of any kind is not in concert with the area is not reason enough, I offer the following: CR 59 is not a major thoroughfare equipped to handle the additional traffic from campers, water and propane deliveries. The mix of "various types of camping rigs...hikers, ATV/OHV and mountain bikers" they hope to attract are a recipe for disaster on this unimproved road. Most secondary commerce (shopping, entertainment/recreation and fuel) that would be driven by this would occur in Teller county rather than Park, thus creating more of a financial liability than profit to Park County. 102 Old Kathleen Trail

N
Nina Kalivas
5 years ago

I too disagree with this proposal for several reasons. There are plenty of campgrounds around 11 mile reservoir, which should be the place tourists gather rather than in our residential area. Further, the additional stress on the dirt roads both north and south of this location will be difficult to repair and maintain; Further disrupting those of us who drive these roads frequently.