The town officials finally backed down and rejected the permit for that massive tower on Norton Road. It took 101 of us refusing to let them trample our town rules to force this result. Stay vigilant because we know these corporations will try to creep back in if we look …
We the undersigned oppose the approval of a 198.8 foot cell tower on Norton Rd., Worcester, VT as being 1) too tall, 2), out of compliance with the Worcester's Ordinance on Cell Towers and Town Plan, and 3) too close to neighboring homes.
The momentum behind this fight against the Norton Road tower is finally making these developers sweat. They thought they could sneak this monstrosity into our backyard without us noticing but they were dead wrong.
Reached 100 supporters
March 16, 2022
64 Comments
D
Diane Hahn
4 years ago
Featured
I oppose this cell tower which, in addition to being a violation of Worcester's ordinances, would ruin the only view of the entire Worcester Range from White Rock to Worcester Mountain, that Iknow of. There must be a better solution.
C
Chris Owen
4 years ago
Featured
Most Worcester residents support improved cell service and a tower but the Industrial Tower proposal contradicts the town's published tower ordinance and town plan on height and location. Worcester deserves better.
K
Kimberly J Bolduc
4 years ago
Featured
While I would appreciate good cell coverage, I am opposed to the location in light of the size and proximity to homes. Better options must be available, such as north of town where there are few to no homes and existing clearings because of logging.
N
Nyssa Green
4 years ago
Featured
We moved to Worcester for its scenic beauty and the limited EMF exposure from power lines and cellular lines. In our view this cell tower would reduce our property value.
E
E s
4 years ago
Featured
This tower is too high, would need to clear an enormous amount of forest, and the company seems unprofessional. As a young adult in Worcester, I would rather have fiber internet than cell service.
A
Andrea Mills
4 years ago
Featured
I do not favor this proposal in the least. I have family on Norton Road and this would destroy too much of the area and the quality of life for all the folks on the road including my family.
M
Mark johnson
4 years ago
I rise in opposition to this cell tower proposal as a violation of the town ordinance
M
Mckalyn Leclerc
4 years ago
While I agree better cell service and/or wifi options in Worcester would benefit the community, I oppose this project given the proposed size and location of the tower, not to mention that it is in violation of Town Ordinance and Town Plan.
The town officials finally backed down and rejected the permit for that massive tower on Norton Road. It took 101 of us refusing to let them trample our town rules to force this result. Stay vigilant because we know these corporations will try to creep back in if we look …
We the undersigned oppose the approval of a 198.8 foot cell tower on Norton Rd., Worcester, VT as being 1) too tall, 2), out of compliance with the Worcester's Ordinance on Cell Towers and Town Plan, and 3) too close to neighboring homes.
The momentum behind this fight against the Norton Road tower is finally making these developers sweat. They thought they could sneak this monstrosity into our backyard without us noticing but they were dead wrong.
Reached 100 supporters
March 16, 2022
64 Comments
D
Diane Hahn
4 years ago
Featured
I oppose this cell tower which, in addition to being a violation of Worcester's ordinances, would ruin the only view of the entire Worcester Range from White Rock to Worcester Mountain, that Iknow of. There must be a better solution.
C
Chris Owen
4 years ago
Featured
Most Worcester residents support improved cell service and a tower but the Industrial Tower proposal contradicts the town's published tower ordinance and town plan on height and location. Worcester deserves better.
K
Kimberly J Bolduc
4 years ago
Featured
While I would appreciate good cell coverage, I am opposed to the location in light of the size and proximity to homes. Better options must be available, such as north of town where there are few to no homes and existing clearings because of logging.
N
Nyssa Green
4 years ago
Featured
We moved to Worcester for its scenic beauty and the limited EMF exposure from power lines and cellular lines. In our view this cell tower would reduce our property value.
E
E s
4 years ago
Featured
This tower is too high, would need to clear an enormous amount of forest, and the company seems unprofessional. As a young adult in Worcester, I would rather have fiber internet than cell service.
A
Andrea Mills
4 years ago
Featured
I do not favor this proposal in the least. I have family on Norton Road and this would destroy too much of the area and the quality of life for all the folks on the road including my family.
M
Mark johnson
4 years ago
I rise in opposition to this cell tower proposal as a violation of the town ordinance
M
Mckalyn Leclerc
4 years ago
While I agree better cell service and/or wifi options in Worcester would benefit the community, I oppose this project given the proposed size and location of the tower, not to mention that it is in violation of Town Ordinance and Town Plan.
I oppose this cell tower which, in addition to being a violation of Worcester's ordinances, would ruin the only view of the entire Worcester Range from White Rock to Worcester Mountain, that Iknow of. There must be a better solution.