Opposition to the proposed AKC judging approval process
46 Comments
C
Christian Manelopoulos
11 years ago
Strongly opposed
E
Ernesto Lara
11 years ago
The proposed process lowers the standards that AKC has strived for since its constitution.
R
Robert fisher
11 years ago
It is obvious to me that a proposal of this kind is blatantly self serving by the authors .
D
D. Andrew Green
11 years ago
Run the dog show calander thru the shredder, rewrite the calander to have fewer, better dog shows. This would make for better shows ,there wouldn't be the need for all these genetic judges and in the long run you may just see better dogs being bred!!
L
Liz must hard
11 years ago
Even tho I could benefit from some of the proposed changes, I oppose their passage because they are not in the best interest of the sport
C
Charles olvis
11 years ago
I wrote my letter and the support of the petitioners confirms that others are in agreement that this proposal is wrong for the sport,
Strongly opposed
The proposed process lowers the standards that AKC has strived for since its constitution.
It is obvious to me that a proposal of this kind is blatantly self serving by the authors .
Run the dog show calander thru the shredder, rewrite the calander to have fewer, better dog shows. This would make for better shows ,there wouldn't be the need for all these genetic judges and in the long run you may just see better dogs being bred!!
Even tho I could benefit from some of the proposed changes, I oppose their passage because they are not in the best interest of the sport
I wrote my letter and the support of the petitioners confirms that others are in agreement that this proposal is wrong for the sport,