Oppose the change of use from dwelling house to childrens home at 1a Roland Drive Nuthall Nottingham by G4S Security.
125 Comments
A
andrew rose
11 years ago
Inappropriate location no facilities either social or educational . Also very close for major roads leaving the area if resident decides to leave home . Get a grip g4 do some research.
C
Caroline Bailey
11 years ago
I strongly oppose this! I have young children who feel safe on our quiet estate and we don't want this in our area!
D
Debra wilson
11 years ago
No thanks
C
Charles Richard Watkins
11 years ago
I feel it would not bode for the area and residents
J
Jeanette Stasuik
11 years ago
i do not want the home in this area. It is not equipped for troubled children.
K
Karen Bulmer
11 years ago
How have the local Cllr's aloud it to get this far,.No matter what assurances they give us, it will have a massive impact on our community and house prices.
J
John Huffadine
11 years ago
unsuitable venue next to a main road junction plus other homes run by G4S have a poor reputation with many police attendances concerning behaviour.
J
josephine marr
11 years ago
As a parent inthe community this proposal really concerns me, first and formost for my families safety and wellbeing, but also because a residential area is not a suitable area for a children's home.
E
Elina falcon
11 years ago
I do not agree with this proposal and want to lodge this fact
K
Katie horkan
11 years ago
notvwanting this near where I live, iv had this before and we had nothing but problems ie brake ins, cars being stolen
C
Colin Boot
11 years ago
I am against this because of; The poor record of conduct by G4S, There are no facilities for the children on the estate, Associated persons entering the area to pray on vulnerable children.
S
Susan Siddons
11 years ago
Just listen to the people who have to live in this area . keep it for family's ,and keep the area safe for children.
P
paul meek
11 years ago
putting a place like that in a good neighbourhood that is already surrounded by problem areas is a foolish idea.
S
Sharon Brown
11 years ago
Featured
can only agree with what others have said, there is no sensible reason to put this home in Nuthall, there isnt anything in Nuthall to keep the children occupied and with G4S's poor record of running these homes it can only bring problems to the people who choose to live here.
M
Mechelle Meek
11 years ago
We have enough trouble already to contend with in Nuthall, I totally oppose this it will only bring more of the same, we don't want this here
K
Kaye Cheung
11 years ago
there is no infrastructure in nuthall to support this application, which raises the risk of crime and asb increasing. In addition this will create a traffic and parking nightmare for residents.
D
David
11 years ago
Roland avenue,will become broxtowe/ bullwell avenue,kid playing football all hours.put one near a mp.in the country side
M
martin deavin
11 years ago
these children homes should be closer to the city centre wher there are lot more amenities for teenagers like g4s other home
C
Claudia Chan
11 years ago
Our area are mostly retired pensioners and families with young kids. We do not want to have the children home built here to ruin our quiet and peaceful area.
A
A Nother
· petition starter
11 years ago
For these homes to be successful they have to work closely with the local police force. G4S didn't even attend the initial meeting with local police officers. Can they change the use of the home and change to different residents (such as sex offenders and adult occupants) without notifying the public, if this planning goes ahead?
Inappropriate location no facilities either social or educational . Also very close for major roads leaving the area if resident decides to leave home . Get a grip g4 do some research.
I strongly oppose this! I have young children who feel safe on our quiet estate and we don't want this in our area!
No thanks
I feel it would not bode for the area and residents
i do not want the home in this area. It is not equipped for troubled children.
How have the local Cllr's aloud it to get this far,.No matter what assurances they give us, it will have a massive impact on our community and house prices.
unsuitable venue next to a main road junction plus other homes run by G4S have a poor reputation with many police attendances concerning behaviour.
As a parent inthe community this proposal really concerns me, first and formost for my families safety and wellbeing, but also because a residential area is not a suitable area for a children's home.
I do not agree with this proposal and want to lodge this fact
notvwanting this near where I live, iv had this before and we had nothing but problems ie brake ins, cars being stolen
I am against this because of; The poor record of conduct by G4S, There are no facilities for the children on the estate, Associated persons entering the area to pray on vulnerable children.
Just listen to the people who have to live in this area . keep it for family's ,and keep the area safe for children.
putting a place like that in a good neighbourhood that is already surrounded by problem areas is a foolish idea.
can only agree with what others have said, there is no sensible reason to put this home in Nuthall, there isnt anything in Nuthall to keep the children occupied and with G4S's poor record of running these homes it can only bring problems to the people who choose to live here.
We have enough trouble already to contend with in Nuthall, I totally oppose this it will only bring more of the same, we don't want this here
there is no infrastructure in nuthall to support this application, which raises the risk of crime and asb increasing. In addition this will create a traffic and parking nightmare for residents.
Roland avenue,will become broxtowe/ bullwell avenue,kid playing football all hours.put one near a mp.in the country side
these children homes should be closer to the city centre wher there are lot more amenities for teenagers like g4s other home
Our area are mostly retired pensioners and families with young kids. We do not want to have the children home built here to ruin our quiet and peaceful area.
For these homes to be successful they have to work closely with the local police force. G4S didn't even attend the initial meeting with local police officers. Can they change the use of the home and change to different residents (such as sex offenders and adult occupants) without notifying the public, if this planning goes ahead?