Oppose St. Perpetua Cell Phone Tower in Lafayette, CA
46 Comments
A
Ashley Coates
12 years ago
Cell phone towers do not belong on school grounds
S
Samantha Zehr
12 years ago
oppose
K
Kevin Mein
12 years ago
Not in favor.
J
Jeff Hutchinson
12 years ago
Featured
Something like this has no place at a school with young children, especially when the potential EMR impacts are unclear. Also, there is plenty of cell coverage in Lafayette. AT&T should piggy back onto the many existing Cell towers.
K
Kathleen Shea
12 years ago
There r enough towers in our area. Don't want them near our children.
S
Steve Sovik
12 years ago
Why risk something that is so controversial with our children?
S
Susie Sovik
12 years ago
A very bad idea. If you don't know the consequences then don't do it.
K
Kim Vaughn
12 years ago
Protect the health of our children. Do not allow cell towers to be built near schools.
J
Joy Wiehn
12 years ago
Featured
I'm a Hamlin neighbor and feel that there are better locations for this cell tower than at a school and so close to my house.
A
Alicia Griffith
12 years ago
I oppose any and all cell towers to be placed within 1500 ft of schools or hospitals.
K
Karim Mansour
12 years ago
Featured
I don't think that many would dispute the increasing evidence that demonstrates that RF radiation can and does have a biologic effect. What we don't know is, "is the effect harmful or result in any downstream pathology". As such, until non-biased, controlled studies are conducted to answer this question, we MUST employ the "Precautionary Principle" which employs us to abandon this project until we can definitively say that RF exposure is free of health related risk. We owe this to our children and to our community.
P
Pamela Double
12 years ago
I am concerned for the health and safety of St Perpetua students.
S
Shawn Suko
12 years ago
There have been very few studies focused specifically on how electromagnetic radiation emitted from cell towers affect children’s health. The studies that have been conducted show conflicting results, so it is far from conclusive that cell tower exposure poses no health risks. I don’t want my child to be part of this experiment, so I oppose the installation of a cell tower at St. Perpetua School.
L
Lori Larson
12 years ago
Why take the risk?
R
Rene ONeill
12 years ago
Children come first.
S
Sara koehl
12 years ago
In all the research, I've yet to see a positive to this tower being on our school property.
A
Anne Hawkins
12 years ago
Please dont put our children at risk for money
M
Michael Clemens
12 years ago
Common sense should play a role in this scenario. Additionally, the money lost from families exiting the schools will greatly outweigh the financial gain from the tower.
A
Amy Wixson
12 years ago
Featured
I don't take chances with my children's health for any reason. I don't want to go to a school that is willing to take that chance with my kids' health for financial gain.
L
Lloyd Morgan
12 years ago
Featured
To exposse children to a possible carcinogen is unconsciousnable. Would the church expsose to childrent to lead, DDT and other possible carcinogens?
Cell phone towers do not belong on school grounds
oppose
Not in favor.
Something like this has no place at a school with young children, especially when the potential EMR impacts are unclear. Also, there is plenty of cell coverage in Lafayette. AT&T should piggy back onto the many existing Cell towers.
There r enough towers in our area. Don't want them near our children.
Why risk something that is so controversial with our children?
A very bad idea. If you don't know the consequences then don't do it.
Protect the health of our children. Do not allow cell towers to be built near schools.
I'm a Hamlin neighbor and feel that there are better locations for this cell tower than at a school and so close to my house.
I oppose any and all cell towers to be placed within 1500 ft of schools or hospitals.
I don't think that many would dispute the increasing evidence that demonstrates that RF radiation can and does have a biologic effect. What we don't know is, "is the effect harmful or result in any downstream pathology". As such, until non-biased, controlled studies are conducted to answer this question, we MUST employ the "Precautionary Principle" which employs us to abandon this project until we can definitively say that RF exposure is free of health related risk. We owe this to our children and to our community.
I am concerned for the health and safety of St Perpetua students.
There have been very few studies focused specifically on how electromagnetic radiation emitted from cell towers affect children’s health. The studies that have been conducted show conflicting results, so it is far from conclusive that cell tower exposure poses no health risks. I don’t want my child to be part of this experiment, so I oppose the installation of a cell tower at St. Perpetua School.
Why take the risk?
Children come first.
In all the research, I've yet to see a positive to this tower being on our school property.
Please dont put our children at risk for money
Common sense should play a role in this scenario. Additionally, the money lost from families exiting the schools will greatly outweigh the financial gain from the tower.
I don't take chances with my children's health for any reason. I don't want to go to a school that is willing to take that chance with my kids' health for financial gain.
To exposse children to a possible carcinogen is unconsciousnable. Would the church expsose to childrent to lead, DDT and other possible carcinogens?