Skip to main content

Status: Closed — this petition is no longer accepting signatures.

OPPOSE SENATE BILL 477

OPPOSE SENATE BILL 477

Closed — 38 supporters Verified

Final supporters

K
Kathy T.
J
josef
T
terri m.
J
Joshua C.
L
Lisa S.
K
Kathy S.
M
Michael H.
S
shannon m.
K
Kay H.
T
Tina R.
+28 more
Started by Anonymous 14 years, 7 months ago
The Issue: Many pet animals may soon be illegal to own in West Virginia under legislation pending in the state. Senate Bill 477 grants broad authority to the Department of Agriculture and Bureau for Public Health to ban possession of all species of animals that are not specifically defined as “domestic and livestock, including mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians and fresh water fish.” Because the definition of so-called “wild and exotic” animals is so broad and amorphous, it could encompass virtually any species, including animals that are commonly kept as pets. The Impact: While many states wishes to regulate animals that may pose a threat to public health or safety will list specific species of concern, SB 477 takes a far different approach. Providing that no person may “own, possess, breed, harbor, transport, release or have custody or control of a wild and exotic animal,” the bill then defines a wild and exotic animal to mean any animals other than those defined as domestic and livestock, including mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians and fresh water fish that “may be considered dangerous to humans, other animals or the environment.” Livestock means only captive animals that are raised solely for meat or animal by-products or as brood-stock (i.e. by definition, not pets). Domestic animals are those which “through extremely long association with humans, predominately as companions and pets, [have] been bred to a degree which has resulted in genetic changes affecting the temperament, color, conformation or other attributes of the species to an extent that makes them unique and distinguishable from wild individuals of their species.” This definition may be difficult to meet and, in any case, is highly subjective in nature. The Division of Natural Resources is charged with publishing a “comprehensive list” of domestic animals by rule, which means any species not on that list would immediately become illegal to own. The bill does allow persons who already own an animal on the banned species list to be grandfathered in under a permit process, but no further propagation would be allowed.

Updates

February 26, 2012

Reaching this level of support feels heavy because it proves how many of us are afraid of losing our companions. The exhaustion is real but seeing this momentum grow confirms that I cannot stop pushing forward against this bill.

3 Comments

J
Jennifer Alvarez
14 years ago Featured

Are they serious with this? My family has owned birds for years and they are perfectly safe. Get a real job instead of bothering folks.

M
Mike Greer
14 years ago Featured

total overreach. they want to control every single thing we do. leave our pets alone!

S
Sarah Rodriguez
14 years ago Featured

This is ridiculous. My bearded dragon is not a threat to anyone. Stop trying to tell us what we can have in our own homes.