Oppose LCDs and open up access to all MIGS options for glaucoma patients
160 Comments
D
Darline Burke
2 years ago
How can you in good conscience eliminate help for people losing their vision?? There are things more important than money and vision is one of them. Please reconsider this action!
T
Tatiaana Palma
2 years ago
I strongly oppose any and all LCDs and want open access to ALL MIGS options for glaucoma patients. It is criminal to limit our access to efficacious, proven, safe and minimally invasive treatments for glaucoma patients.
W
Wendy Portman
2 years ago
I've had 3 glaucoma surgery's and due to an unusual condition, I could need another more invasive procedure in the hopes to keep my vision. Please do not succumb to the insurance companies and protect the patients.
F
Felise May Barte
2 years ago
Do NOT restrict or limit surgeries for glaucoma patients. Let eye surgeons make surgical decisions and provide care to their patients.
S
Soni Wiseman
2 years ago
Oppose LCDs and open up access to LCDs that limit the role of MIGS(Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery) in glaucoma treatment.all MIGS options for glaucoma patients. As a glaucoma patient, this is devastating for many reasons including limiting treatment options for patients and requiring doctors to do more invasive surgeries for mild to moderate glaucoma.
V
Veena
2 years ago
In support of glaucoma patients to have accessibility to all proven IOP reducing treatment options.
R
Rashad Ahmeduddin
2 years ago
This should have never happened.
R
Robert Murray Hughes
2 years ago
Great idea to ban this MIGS stuff - it will make my investment in drug therapy companies SO much more profitable. I mean seriously, who wants procedures that reduce eye pressure & thus reduce dependence on drug requirements, that would only reduce the amount of $$$ you intellectual giants will have to pay out in drug costs & we certainly don't want to reduce drug company profits do we :-)
D
Dr Henry Greenspan
2 years ago
I write in the role of patient as well as emeritus prof. There is no scientific justification for the restrictions foisted on pts. by MACs. Period.
S
Susan Williams
2 years ago
Thank you for creating this petition.
A
Atay Kural
2 years ago
I have used all the drug options , I am a candidate for MIGS.
M
Margaret Cowell
2 years ago
As the parent of a child with congenital glaucoma, I support all treatments that will help glaucoma patients fight this horrible disease.
A
Alan Weiss
2 years ago
Medicare has no right to not cover proven surgery. Stay out of the expertise of physicians.
T
Toni Dove
2 years ago
This will limit needed options for glaucoma patients and stifle research in new devices.
E
Elaine Kellerman
2 years ago
Older people should have access to the best options for preserving good eye sight.
A
Ann
2 years ago
I agree with Sam Johnson of Australia, Sydney! Could not put it better.
A
Anonymous
2 years ago
It makes no sense to exclude coverage of procedures that have proven to be effective with the least side effects. This decision should be reversed!
M
Mark Gallardo MD
2 years ago
These LCD changes harm patients and people of color are disproportionately harmed.
D
Diane Royal
2 years ago
Please reverse this decision! It is very harmful to glaucoma patients!
A
Amy Aleck
2 years ago
Patients deserve access to a variety of surgical options and doctors should not be limited when choosing what treatment is best for their patients.
How can you in good conscience eliminate help for people losing their vision?? There are things more important than money and vision is one of them. Please reconsider this action!
I strongly oppose any and all LCDs and want open access to ALL MIGS options for glaucoma patients. It is criminal to limit our access to efficacious, proven, safe and minimally invasive treatments for glaucoma patients.
I've had 3 glaucoma surgery's and due to an unusual condition, I could need another more invasive procedure in the hopes to keep my vision. Please do not succumb to the insurance companies and protect the patients.
Do NOT restrict or limit surgeries for glaucoma patients. Let eye surgeons make surgical decisions and provide care to their patients.
Oppose LCDs and open up access to LCDs that limit the role of MIGS(Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery) in glaucoma treatment.all MIGS options for glaucoma patients. As a glaucoma patient, this is devastating for many reasons including limiting treatment options for patients and requiring doctors to do more invasive surgeries for mild to moderate glaucoma.
In support of glaucoma patients to have accessibility to all proven IOP reducing treatment options.
This should have never happened.
Great idea to ban this MIGS stuff - it will make my investment in drug therapy companies SO much more profitable. I mean seriously, who wants procedures that reduce eye pressure & thus reduce dependence on drug requirements, that would only reduce the amount of $$$ you intellectual giants will have to pay out in drug costs & we certainly don't want to reduce drug company profits do we :-)
I write in the role of patient as well as emeritus prof. There is no scientific justification for the restrictions foisted on pts. by MACs. Period.
Thank you for creating this petition.
I have used all the drug options , I am a candidate for MIGS.
As the parent of a child with congenital glaucoma, I support all treatments that will help glaucoma patients fight this horrible disease.
Medicare has no right to not cover proven surgery. Stay out of the expertise of physicians.
This will limit needed options for glaucoma patients and stifle research in new devices.
Older people should have access to the best options for preserving good eye sight.
I agree with Sam Johnson of Australia, Sydney! Could not put it better.
It makes no sense to exclude coverage of procedures that have proven to be effective with the least side effects. This decision should be reversed!
These LCD changes harm patients and people of color are disproportionately harmed.
Please reverse this decision! It is very harmful to glaucoma patients!
Patients deserve access to a variety of surgical options and doctors should not be limited when choosing what treatment is best for their patients.