Skip to main content

Oppose Increase in DUs Allowed Per Acre

78 Comments

K
Kathy Russ
8 years ago

I oppose any changes in zoning to allow multi unit or businesses to build in this area.

K
Karen Bruno
8 years ago Featured

Redevelop some crappy area downtown before continuing the sprawl.....and do NOT change the Master Plan. What is the point of creating a master plan if you are going to change it willy nilly?

T
THOMAS F BAUER
8 years ago

We have worked very hard to keep this area from being overdeveloped. 1/3 acre per dwelling is plenty. We don't need anymore apartments or condo's in this area. The streets are already over packed with traffic. We have way to much traffic on the way to the I580 north and south. My wife already signed this. Priscilla Bauer

J
Julie Peterson
8 years ago

I do not want any change to the current plan.

S
Stephanie Wilson
8 years ago

I am against the zoning change.

P
Priscilla
8 years ago

No change please.

L
linda brown
8 years ago

I oppose the increase . Should remain as is.

C
Carole dollarhide
8 years ago

I'm against

P
Pam Netuschil
8 years ago

We live here because of the wildlife and open spaces. We don't want it taken away!

C
Carole Dollarhide
8 years ago

I'm against

E
Erin Howell
8 years ago

Opposed to amending the language in SW 1.8

J
Jesse Ruppert
8 years ago

This development should stand as originally planned with 3 units per acre. We can't stop development, but please do not OVERdevelop this area. The increased traffic and congestion from the apartments on Arrowcreek and Wedge are more than enough for the current and future residents to handle - as well as what Mother Nature and her creatures can handle. Let's please keep some space open!

S
Shauna Adams
8 years ago

Current traffic routes do not support This zoning change. Neither does existing water allocations for valley.

K
Kim
8 years ago

The area is overcrowded with too much stress/congestion on the limited roads /street

S
Shannon Cook
8 years ago

Please don’t fight!!

S
Sossi Sarafian
8 years ago

No overdevelopment please.

D
Debbie Russell
8 years ago

Flooding and traffic on need to be studied.

D
Dale Reitz
8 years ago

I am opposed to this change in the housing density for TCSCMA. I live in Saddlehorn and believe that this change would certainly lead to increased traffic congestion, crime, trash around the area, and a general decrease in the vision and character of the Thomas Creek area.

J
John Mead
8 years ago

Went to the CAB meeting last night. Thanks for setting this up.

A
Anonymous
8 years ago

The described site cannot support higher density housing which must also include infrastructure, access and egress and the negative impact on traffic flow, the country atmosphere and its natural environment. Stop the spoiling of what is left of open space.