Oppose Dual Occupancy in Bayswood

Summercloud No dual occupancy developments in Bayswood! Approval of dual occupancy DA would be a betrayal by the Shoalhaven City Council to the residents of Bayswood. The dual occupancy development proposal at 61 Summercloud Crescent would not result in a high standard of building and would not protect the amenity of surrounding properties and the scenic or landscape qualities of area.

There is insufficient on street parking for dual occupancy in Bayswood. Parked ng bays are often used for permanent parking of caravans and similar. The original master plan had excluded dual occupancy and was changed without residents consent.Dual occupancy increases the likelihood of short term rental such as air bnb which does not add to the community but causes disruption to residents.

The proposed development is incompatible with the Bayswood Master Plan which was developed with a vision of single dwellings on each block. It is a low density concept. Any determination to allow dual occupancy on any block within the estate increases this to medium density and therefore ought to be opposed. Council has a responsibility to keep faith with residents rather than allow Sydney based companies to apply state based planning regulations to a location that they have no interest in or knowledge of or concern for the impact that it will create locally. Once again traffic concerns are both legitimate and obvious with the most likely outcome being an overflow onto the street on a corner. I strongly oppose dual occupancy in Summercloud Crescent and more broadly in the Bayswood Estate.

Keep the original Bayswood Master Plan going so as to maintain the character of the estate as it currently is PLEASE!!!

Summercloud - bulk and scale of DA not compatible with current dwellings in Bayswood (single dwellings). The DA is not sympathetic with the streetscape and does not complement the existing and desired future character of the area - lack of adequate parking facilities will lead to cars on council strip, posing a safety hazard for residents. In addition, Summercloud is a perimeter road where in times of emergencies (i.e fires), emergency vehicle access and manoeuvrability will be compromised posing further risk to resident properties

45 Summercloud Cres Vincentia

We were told the estate would be for single dwellings. Streets too narrow is one of many reasons.

Opposing the dual occupancy DA in Summercloud Cres Vincentia

Summercloud crescent

Opposing dual occupancy in Bayswood.

Summercloud Crescent

Summercloud Crescent.

This DA is not in keeping with the low density design requirements of the Bayswood development. It should be refused approval as have other strata developments on the area. The subdivision of the site makes each lot too small.

Summercloud Crescent

Reef Street

Bayswood Ave

Bayswood Avenue

Summercloud Crescent resident, this is NOT what we were ‘sold’. It’s supposed to be a family residential estate with blocks as they were sold, not blocks subdivided to be tiny with the potential for too many cars trying to park with no parking facility provided.

Seagrass Avenue

Beam st