I was raised in an era where scientific reasoning considered all possibilities. As an achieved engineering tech I learned to look at questions that needed answers or problems that needed solutions from all points of view and inside out to make the right analysis to solve problems or improve a product. Yet today I see peer reviews of evidences that contradict the standard accepted 'set in stone' acceptance of theory as fact. I am curious why evidences can not be revealed through history. On set of evidences ignored is history. Let me elaborate.

The common consensus is that dinosaurs died off 65 million years ago yet in the last ~5000 yrs of recorded history at least 20 countries and I believe 85 civilizations around the world recorded depictions of all kinds of dinosaurs accurately. The interconnection of cultures was very limited due to distance, especially with travel on the seas and oceans or between continents except for crossover points like in the artic north. Also, the span of time is ~5000 years.

Logically I assess that clarity of perception of what the animals looked like probably did not come from modern paleontology practices of reconstructing bones, let alone covering the bones with emulation of flesh, eyes, and other missing parts. In other words, until modern times the world could not conceive of such details to paint the same pictures in so many civilizations over ~5000 years. Plus I sincerely doubt pictures and carvings of dinosaurs eating people and people hunting them, etc came purely out of imagination. Thus logic dictates that they must have seen such animals and recorded what got their attention vs imagination.

Therefore, I ask the question why such facts are ignored that question the common core standards of years since they existed?

PS I am not focusing on soft tissue in T-Rex bones, but will adversely question how such can exist for 85 million years.