I think this needs to be further thought out and how this will effect our market, the buyers, the sellers, and most of all the agents within the association.
E
Ed Finlan
6 years ago
This only protects NWMLS not brokers
M
Melanie Woodward
6 years ago
Featured
The on-going sellers market is driving this. It will be interesting to see the shift when the market becomes neutral, or a buyers market. We pay our dues, we should be involved with the final decision.
S
sandy eslick
6 years ago
Must be discussed with the members before anything is done.
K
Kevin Burgess
6 years ago
This new rule needs to be discussed and voted on by the members.
C
Cindie Conklin
6 years ago
Featured
I think as well that this matter needs member input before implementation.
I am anxious to see if it will be discussed at the Realtors Fall conference.
R
Renae Kettler
6 years ago
The NWMLS had no right passing this rule without discussion from the members.
C
Cheryl Keefe
6 years ago
Featured
There are way too many facets that have not been discussed or explored. For the health and welfare of our industry we need time to really look at it’s far reaching potential issues. What is the hurry?
A
Anonymous
6 years ago
Featured
if The intent is to stop those who are shady in the industry, go directly after them and penalize them. Take their license, impose bigger fines, get to the root and remove it. If not they will find another work around.
B
Barbara Huff
6 years ago
It’s crazy how our association made such an important decision with no discussion. They truly did throw us members under the bus.
L
Linda Sanford
6 years ago
I would like more discussion with expansion on this proposed change.
J
Judy Chapman
6 years ago
I agree that we need much more discussion on these issues, and to make such changes without it would not benefit any of us, and as proposed would be confusing to the general public.
E
Elizabeth Perron
6 years ago
Count me in! :)
M
Micah Wriglesworth
6 years ago
Featured
The rule change is completely ridiculous and removes competition in the market place. Classic rule change based on a few dishonest brokers or brokers that do not communicate well with clients and the masses suffer. Not to mention the consumer!
L
Leslie Iacolucci
6 years ago
Who is this change benefiting? Probably not the consumer and definitely not agent sole proprietors. Unbelievable!!
D
Danny A Baird
6 years ago
Commission is and always has been negotiable. This makes no since, if they do make this change they need to slow down.
G
Gina McClung
6 years ago
This needs more consideration before implementation.
M
Mike Darden
6 years ago
Unbelievable!!!
J
Janis McHarg
6 years ago
Featured
Our commission structure has always been negotiable so "transparency" is not the real issue here, although the NWMLS would like you to believe that. Shame on them for throwing their members under the bus! This is not good for our industry and completely unnecessary.
A
Allen Workman
6 years ago
Commission has always been negotiable and never fixed and inflexible as the NWMLS would like us to believe. Roll back this change. It will hurt our industry.
I think this needs to be further thought out and how this will effect our market, the buyers, the sellers, and most of all the agents within the association.
This only protects NWMLS not brokers
The on-going sellers market is driving this. It will be interesting to see the shift when the market becomes neutral, or a buyers market. We pay our dues, we should be involved with the final decision.
Must be discussed with the members before anything is done.
This new rule needs to be discussed and voted on by the members.
I think as well that this matter needs member input before implementation. I am anxious to see if it will be discussed at the Realtors Fall conference.
The NWMLS had no right passing this rule without discussion from the members.
There are way too many facets that have not been discussed or explored. For the health and welfare of our industry we need time to really look at it’s far reaching potential issues. What is the hurry?
if The intent is to stop those who are shady in the industry, go directly after them and penalize them. Take their license, impose bigger fines, get to the root and remove it. If not they will find another work around.
It’s crazy how our association made such an important decision with no discussion. They truly did throw us members under the bus.
I would like more discussion with expansion on this proposed change.
I agree that we need much more discussion on these issues, and to make such changes without it would not benefit any of us, and as proposed would be confusing to the general public.
Count me in! :)
The rule change is completely ridiculous and removes competition in the market place. Classic rule change based on a few dishonest brokers or brokers that do not communicate well with clients and the masses suffer. Not to mention the consumer!
Who is this change benefiting? Probably not the consumer and definitely not agent sole proprietors. Unbelievable!!
Commission is and always has been negotiable. This makes no since, if they do make this change they need to slow down.
This needs more consideration before implementation.
Unbelievable!!!
Our commission structure has always been negotiable so "transparency" is not the real issue here, although the NWMLS would like you to believe that. Shame on them for throwing their members under the bus! This is not good for our industry and completely unnecessary.
Commission has always been negotiable and never fixed and inflexible as the NWMLS would like us to believe. Roll back this change. It will hurt our industry.