Skip to main content

they actually listened and reversed the single judge plan so we keep our two judge panels after all. i am still kind of stunned honestly but it really proves that speaking up actually does something when everyone stays focused. i will be keeping a very close eye on the commission …

January 28, 2014

Number of Judges at SHN

Number of Judges at SHN

🏆 Won — 250 supporters Verified

Final supporters

N
Nancy J.
S
Someone
K
Kimberly W.
T
TRACIE L.
S
Someone
M
Marisa S.
M
mary m.
L
Laurie O.
M
Marla P.
S
Sandy J.
+240 more
PI
Started by Peggy Ingles 12 years, 10 months ago
As members and exhibitors of the Arabian Horse Association we strongly feel that the SHN Commission's plan to utilize only one judge in Working Hunter, Jumper, and Sport Horse In Hand classes at the Arabian Sport Horse Nationals is counterproductive to the growth of the Sport Horse division and thus the Sport Horse National show.

There is no U.S. National Championship class that uses only one person to adjudicate. Historically, U.S. Nationals employs 5 judges, Youth Nationals utilizes 3 judges on their panels and Sport Horse only 2 judges per class. Having a judging panel rather than a single judge is a defining characteristic of a National caliber horse show, and the Arabian Sport Horse Nationals already has smaller judging panels than U.S. Nationals and Youth Nationals. The practice of having a panel of judges at elite level horse shows promotes fairness, offsets individual biases, and provides depth to the assessment of the exhibitors in the classes that is simply not possible with a single judge.

To reduce the number of judges at Sport Horse Nationals for Working Hunter, Jumper, and Sport Horse In Hand classes to a single judge would remove a critically important aspect of showing at the national level and diminish the value of the experience for exhibitors resulting in reduced participation. We the undersigned express support for maintaining the current standard for a 2 judge panel for all classes at Arabian Sport Horse Nationals.

Updates

Reached 250 supporters

November 5, 2013

October 26, 2013

I just looked at the screen and saw we crossed the one hundred mark which honestly feels surreal because I was just venting my frustrations late at night and now I know I am not the only one annoyed by these judging changes. It is wild to think about how many people actually care enough to sign their names to this since it proves my point that we expect higher standards for our nationals than just a single set of eyes.

Reached 100 supporters

October 25, 2013

7 Comments

K
Kimberly Wenger
11 years ago Featured

Although certainly all the judges hired to work at Sport Horse Nationals are more than qualified, most certainly each one has preferences unique to them. Nothing wrong with that...we all do. Having multiple judges helps to achieve balance.

C
Cheryl Showah
12 years ago Featured

WE NEED A THREE-JUDGE SYSTEM LIKE "REAL" NATIONALS. SPORT HORSE IS ONE OF THE FASTEST GROWING SEGMENTS OF THE ARABIAN INDUSTRY, WE NEED TO HAVE REAL JUDGES, PROPERLY TRAINED FOR THESE VENUES, OR YOU WILL LOSE THE SUPPORT OF THE EXHIBITORS.

D
Dave Schneider
12 years ago Featured

totally agree with this. it feels like they are cheaping out and the horses deserve better

S
Sarah Castillo
12 years ago Featured

one judge just isnt enough for a national event. keeps things fair if we have two, please dont change this.

M
Mike Tate
12 years ago Featured

WHY ARE WE GOING BACKWARDS?? Everyone wants more consistent judging, not less. Keep the two judge panel.

L
Lisa Williamson
12 years ago Featured

The cost of showing is already high enough. We deserve a fair panel if we are paying to go to nationals.

N
Nancy Janosik
10 years ago

No to one judge