Skip to main content

#NotintheVillage - Citizens Opposed to Medical Marijuana Dispensary in Village of Fruitport

31 Comments

D
Donald Ipema
9 years ago Featured

As a homeowner in the Village of Fruitport, I believe that the Village not allow this type of operation within the Village. I would think that there would be ordinances in place to, at a minimum, not allow this type of operation within at least 1,000 feet from any school, church, or publicly owed facility.

K
Kathleen Gould
9 years ago

village resident - this is not appropriate place for this type of business.

L
Lisa Rader
9 years ago

Absolutely not !!! To our elected officials, don't let us down !!!

M
Meggan Johnson
9 years ago

No thanks. Terrible location and not what I want the Village of Fruitport to be known for.

C
Chuck Gren
9 years ago

No benefit to the Village or it's residents !

R
Ruth Vanderstelt
9 years ago

No to medical marijuana in the village of Fruitport!

J
Jane A Palazzolo
9 years ago

Please be advised, Patrick V. & Janie A. Palazzolo(Palazzolo’s) ,Strenuously object to Marijuana Growing Facility/Jason Kolkema 135-Third 49415The variance would be tantamount to building a Marijuana facility home in almost any given back yard or front yard of any Fruitport Village home , this example demonstrates just how absurd the request is on its face. Any resident of common sensibilities would be opposed to such a overreaching request. Palazzolo’s are not, nor is their property at 3127 Pleasantwood DR 49415 the Palazzolo’s property is singular, individual and separate which stands on its own as a property in the confines of the Fruitport Township. 4. The Palazzolo’s have lived in good standing on their property over approximately two decades. 5. The Marijuana Grow Facility if granted would open and create a floodgate pandoras box type of situation we believe that the rezoning will have a significant impact on the character and quality not only of our neighborhood, but of the township as a whole. Affecting police, fire, infrastructure, administration, water, dpw, and on and on. 6. Palazzolo’s, believe it is impractical and foolish to change existing zoning to allow Marijuana Grow Facility. 7. The property in question was a manufacture facility. fenced secure property for at least 5 decades. 8. Palazzolo’s believe that the proposed zoning change directly contradicts the comprehensive plan that Fruitport Village and CharterTownship has placed on record to date. If allow, this could be the first in a series of zoning changes that could adversely impact many neighborhoods in the township. 11. Palazzolo’s believe this would have “chilling effect” with respect to safety, enjoyment of peace-of-mind, and even hostile situations where police and other Village/Township resources had to be called in due to the misuse of the Drugs and undue harm to the Palazzolo’s physical, mental, emotional right to a pea

P
Patrick V Palazzolo
9 years ago

Please be advised, Patrick V. & Janie A. Palazzolo(Palazzolo’s) ,Strenuously object to Marijuana Growing Facility/Jason Kolkema 135-Third 49415The variance would be tantamount to building a Marijuana facility home in almost any given back yard or front yard of any Fruitport Village home , this example demonstrates just how absurd the request is on its face. Any resident of common sensibilities would be opposed to such a overreaching request. Palazzolo’s are not, nor is their property at 3127 Pleasantwood DR 49415 the Palazzolo’s property is singular, individual and separate which stands on its own as a property in the confines of the Fruitport Township. 4. The Palazzolo’s have lived in good standing on their property over approximately two decades. 5. The Marijuana Grow Facility if granted would open and create a floodgate pandoras box type of situation we believe that the rezoning will have a significant impact on the character and quality not only of our neighborhood, but of the township as a whole. Affecting police, fire, infrastructure, administration, water, dpw, and on and on. 6. Palazzolo’s, believe it is impractical and foolish to change existing zoning to allow Marijuana Grow Facility. 7. The property in question was a manufacture facility. fenced secure property for at least 5 decades. 8. Palazzolo’s believe that the proposed zoning change directly contradicts the comprehensive plan that Fruitport Village and CharterTownship has placed on record to date. If allow, this could be the first in a series of zoning changes that could adversely impact many neighborhoods in the township. 11. Palazzolo’s believe this would have “chilling effect” with respect to safety, enjoyment of peace-of-mind, and even hostile situations where police and other Village/Township resources had to be called in due to the misuse of the Drugs and undue harm to the Palazzolo’s physical, mental, emotional right to a peace

R
Ruth Vanderstelt
9 years ago

Village resident - I say "NO" to a medical marijuana facility in the village

A
Anonymous
9 years ago

Township resident

D
Darren Anderson
9 years ago

NO!

R
Robert Witte
9 years ago

township

A
Anonymous
9 years ago

Village

J
Jake Swieringa
9 years ago

No!! They can grow this out of town someplace,a down side is marijuana smoking for recreational pleasure. We have schools and children's play ground and parks here!

N
Nicole McIntyre
9 years ago

I am a villiage resident and do not support this.

V
Vanessa Bendixen
9 years ago Featured

I'm very concerned for our Village , if this happens, it's too close to our schools.

D
Darlene Dirkse
9 years ago

I live in the village.

D
Darlene Dirkse
9 years ago

I am a resident of the village, for over 50 years.

R
Ruth Rose
9 years ago

We don't need this in the village!!!

C
Connie Gundy
9 years ago

I am a Village of Fruitport resident. I do not want a grow facility in the Village