We live in this neighborhood for the peace and quiet. I’m completely supportive of SI Prep school, but do not support bright stadium lights and noise at night on a regular basis. Please find another venue to host regular sports events in this manner. We need our peace and quiet time. Thank you for your consideration.
E
Erica Zweig
6 years ago
There is no community benefit with these lights and huge disturbance to neighbors. SI claims to be "good neighbor" NOT!!
A
Annie Chow
6 years ago
SI must provide more onsite parking. No cell tower!
K
Katherine Cuellar
6 years ago
No lights! No cell tower!
M
Maneesh Bhide
6 years ago
I WANT to support this project, however there are four things SI would have to commit to, in writing, for me to support this project:
1) Light pollution mitigation: SI must use focused, directed lights to minimize light polution as much as possible
2) Trash:SI must articulate and commit to a plan to reduce the amount of trash brought out of SI, and into the surrounding neighborhood.
3) Parking: SI must provide more onsite parking for attendees, to support increased usage at night, when residents are most likely to desire parking as well.
4) neighborhood support: SI must provide some sort of access to the track and tennis courts for neighbors, during non school/event hours (USF does something similar).
J
Julie and Rob Almeida
6 years ago
We are against the proposed stadium lighting. We currently have a lovely view from our house, and we do not want to look out at a monstrosity of stadium lighting, especially late into the evening. Home is a place to relax- not be bothered by massive lights shining in your windows when you are trying to sleep, or relax. Not only are they an eyesore, they will increase traffic, noise, pollution to mention a few. Homeowners don't want to park blocks from their house because there is an additional huge influx of cars coming directly into this neighborhood. There is already an issue with SI related cars parking outside of our homes during the day.
There is an overwheling consensus among people who live here - and that is - we don't want the lights or the 5G.
J
Jeffrey R Crowley
6 years ago
No to lights on private property.Lights completely ruined South Sunset soccer field.
A
Adlai Manzo
6 years ago
NO
J
Jay Manzo
6 years ago
I strongly oppose this project:
1) Speaking as an architect, this project is completely out of scale with the surounding residential neighborhood and will be an eyesore. It does a disservice to the community and city by imposing such out of scale and inappropriate structures. 2) It does not serve the community or neighborhood. SI is a private school and the lights will be on to 10pm degrading the public environment with light pollution 200 nights a week. 3) Night games will only bring more traffic and noise and pollution to a residential area seriously degrading our neighborhood peace and health. 4) Light pollution will further degrade our ability to see and appreciate the stars in this area of the city which is known for having darker skies.
K
Kevin Johnson
6 years ago
I live on 35th Ave and I am in opposition of this project
L
Lindsay Johnson
6 years ago
I oppose
M
Melinda
6 years ago
No to this lighting and NO to 5g. This is going to change the neighborhood In ways that are detrimental to the bird and animal populations and to the humans too. 5g is proven to be a very bad idea and will harm for generations to come
M
Michael Bourne
6 years ago
No lights! No cell tower!
M
Michael Murphy
6 years ago
This project is of no benefit to the community.
A
Anonymous
6 years ago
I strongly oppose this.
A
Anonymous
6 years ago
I can’t believe the level of corruption we have in the city to allow such a project that only hurt the community. I am so upset that our representatives and the people who is in charge of the planificación is the city, have gone ahead with this project. In addition to hurt enormously our environment that include light contamination, birds migration and local wildlife, this project will bring only problems to our neighborhood. We don’t need more games, more people arriving in big quantities to fill up our streets, more noice, more cars, more violence. Our children are able to walk to the park safely ow and that will be imposible with this project.
A
Alex
6 years ago
I agree not to put up the lights, at the school normal days sometimes the students car block my drive way and at game days even worse, people from outside leave trash, drive by make loud noise, terrifies our quiet neighbors
R
Robert Lagomarsino
6 years ago
My family has owned our 39th Ave home since 1948. We live literally across the street from the football field & one of the proposed 90’ light towers.
Growing up, this residential neighborhood was so quiet & peaceful (with a sandlot across the street).
Then SI opened up in 1969. For over 50 years my neighborhood has tried to coexist with the school.
Parking has always been an issue when school is in session. Congestion, noise & trash from time to time. These issues will only be magnified with evening usage of the football field & the massive light towers. SI sent a postcard to the neighbors showing that the proposed lights will be used 200 nights per school year. This would be a major disruption to the peace & quiet of our family oriented Sunset neighborhood.
Another issue that no one I think has brought up is our property values. Will they be adversely affected by these issues of increased noise, no parking, more congestion, light pollution? Home buyers might reconsider in our neighborhood thus driving down market values. It’s something to think about.
Bottom line is that I’m opposed to this project.
No lights
We live in this neighborhood for the peace and quiet. I’m completely supportive of SI Prep school, but do not support bright stadium lights and noise at night on a regular basis. Please find another venue to host regular sports events in this manner. We need our peace and quiet time. Thank you for your consideration.
There is no community benefit with these lights and huge disturbance to neighbors. SI claims to be "good neighbor" NOT!!
SI must provide more onsite parking. No cell tower!
No lights! No cell tower!
I WANT to support this project, however there are four things SI would have to commit to, in writing, for me to support this project: 1) Light pollution mitigation: SI must use focused, directed lights to minimize light polution as much as possible 2) Trash:SI must articulate and commit to a plan to reduce the amount of trash brought out of SI, and into the surrounding neighborhood. 3) Parking: SI must provide more onsite parking for attendees, to support increased usage at night, when residents are most likely to desire parking as well. 4) neighborhood support: SI must provide some sort of access to the track and tennis courts for neighbors, during non school/event hours (USF does something similar).
We are against the proposed stadium lighting. We currently have a lovely view from our house, and we do not want to look out at a monstrosity of stadium lighting, especially late into the evening. Home is a place to relax- not be bothered by massive lights shining in your windows when you are trying to sleep, or relax. Not only are they an eyesore, they will increase traffic, noise, pollution to mention a few. Homeowners don't want to park blocks from their house because there is an additional huge influx of cars coming directly into this neighborhood. There is already an issue with SI related cars parking outside of our homes during the day. There is an overwheling consensus among people who live here - and that is - we don't want the lights or the 5G.
No to lights on private property.Lights completely ruined South Sunset soccer field.
NO
I strongly oppose this project: 1) Speaking as an architect, this project is completely out of scale with the surounding residential neighborhood and will be an eyesore. It does a disservice to the community and city by imposing such out of scale and inappropriate structures. 2) It does not serve the community or neighborhood. SI is a private school and the lights will be on to 10pm degrading the public environment with light pollution 200 nights a week. 3) Night games will only bring more traffic and noise and pollution to a residential area seriously degrading our neighborhood peace and health. 4) Light pollution will further degrade our ability to see and appreciate the stars in this area of the city which is known for having darker skies.
I live on 35th Ave and I am in opposition of this project
I oppose
No to this lighting and NO to 5g. This is going to change the neighborhood In ways that are detrimental to the bird and animal populations and to the humans too. 5g is proven to be a very bad idea and will harm for generations to come
No lights! No cell tower!
This project is of no benefit to the community.
I strongly oppose this.
I can’t believe the level of corruption we have in the city to allow such a project that only hurt the community. I am so upset that our representatives and the people who is in charge of the planificación is the city, have gone ahead with this project. In addition to hurt enormously our environment that include light contamination, birds migration and local wildlife, this project will bring only problems to our neighborhood. We don’t need more games, more people arriving in big quantities to fill up our streets, more noice, more cars, more violence. Our children are able to walk to the park safely ow and that will be imposible with this project.
I agree not to put up the lights, at the school normal days sometimes the students car block my drive way and at game days even worse, people from outside leave trash, drive by make loud noise, terrifies our quiet neighbors
My family has owned our 39th Ave home since 1948. We live literally across the street from the football field & one of the proposed 90’ light towers. Growing up, this residential neighborhood was so quiet & peaceful (with a sandlot across the street). Then SI opened up in 1969. For over 50 years my neighborhood has tried to coexist with the school. Parking has always been an issue when school is in session. Congestion, noise & trash from time to time. These issues will only be magnified with evening usage of the football field & the massive light towers. SI sent a postcard to the neighbors showing that the proposed lights will be used 200 nights per school year. This would be a major disruption to the peace & quiet of our family oriented Sunset neighborhood. Another issue that no one I think has brought up is our property values. Will they be adversely affected by these issues of increased noise, no parking, more congestion, light pollution? Home buyers might reconsider in our neighborhood thus driving down market values. It’s something to think about. Bottom line is that I’m opposed to this project.
No lights at SI please