Skip to main content

11 houses in my backyard - " No to Railroad Cottages"

36 Comments

J
Jamison Sites
9 years ago

For those doubting Falls Church residency of those making comments, many people may post from work which will skew the location based on their work's location or internet configuration. I am a Falls Church resident, 201 N West St, but my work's internet make it appear I am in another city/state.

A
Anonymous
9 years ago

Theresa Twiford, a partner of Bob Young's, tried to do this project - 8 cottages - on land at 26th St. Because of VA and FC setback laws, she was only allowed 2 houses. More info can be found at the 7/7/14 and 8/4/14 FC Planning Commission Docs here: http://www.fallschurchva.gov/364/Planning-Commission

D
Deb Lindner
9 years ago

Nice idea but poor location (at the end of an alley with water issues)

A
Anonymous
9 years ago

Way too many buildings for this size property and a 13-car parking lot.

N
Natalie Roesch
9 years ago

Poor choice of location for this project because of triangle shaped lot. Major traffic issues too.

A
Anonymous
9 years ago

We vote No to this over development on 3 lots

J
Jamison Sites
9 years ago Featured

The cottage housing development code change (Ordinance 1966) allows for the Railroad Cottages but they still must get approval from the city. While cottages in general provide an interesting, and possibly beneficial, alternative to townhouses the ordinance makes it clear that they are a temporary experiment and there will be a review of the projects completed after 3 years. If the experiment is expected to succeed then the Railroad Cottages CANNOT be built as planed because the lot is simply too irregular for an effective implementation. TLDR: Cottages can be good but this lot is too irregular

B
Becky Taylor
9 years ago

No to Railroad cottages

M
Matt Bella
9 years ago

This development will be to dense with not enough parking. Also, the extra housing will cause more traffic. It will also reduce the size of the W&O trail.

A
Anonymous
9 years ago

No to the building project!

T
Trish Horowitz
9 years ago Featured

We cannot start changing the laws so one family can make millions of dollars. It is not fair, and it is not right. Do not bend the rules - stick with them. Mr. Young has given a lot to our community - but this is not right. You could be looking at 44+ children entering the schools from changing this from a 3 home zoning to allow 11 homes.

A
Anton Petras
9 years ago

Too many houses in such a small area is a total safety hazard...one should visit the area to see for oneself...should not be allowed.

A
Anonymous
9 years ago

"An ordinance was passed a few years ago that prevents building 2 houses on 1 lot." City rules and laws need to be applied consistently and fairly.

R
Rohini Winters
9 years ago Featured

Too many homes too close together. I would support 5-6 small homes instead of the 3 the plot is zoned for under R-1 low density residential. But this is too many.

A
Alixandria Lapp
9 years ago

11 homes in a space designed for 3 is simply too many! Thank you for listening.

C
Carol Abel
9 years ago

I am very familiar with both the location and the neighborhood. I can't imagine the impact of so much density in such a tight space with limited access. I don't think this is the right thing for this space.

A
Alex dorsey
9 years ago

This plan to 11 buildings in the area that is given isn't possible and not fair to those who already live on Railroad avenue.

A
Amy
9 years ago Featured

Wondering how 11 houses, and the vehicles belonging to the households, can fit onto 3 lots - 1.25 acres. Not sure that $700K is affordable housing for seniors.

D
Dean Miller
9 years ago

This is is poorly planned and makes little sense