Skip to main content

Say NO to the "Swim with the Tuna" experience at Victor Harbor, say NO to aquaculture on the Fleurieu.

504 Comments

M
Malcolm Brebner
10 years ago

No thanks. A detrimental effect on the environment plus increased shark activity, either perceived or real, would surely have a greater negative effect on the local community than the possible up-side of a few jobs at the fish farm.

M
Mark
10 years ago

Victor Harbour is a beautiful beach side town that attracts plenty of tourists. The last thing it needs is this eyesore ruining the natural beauty of the coastline, there's already too much of that. Increased shark activity in the area is also a big concern.

M
mick holmstrom
10 years ago

VH council, here's your chance to put the environment and the ratepayers concerns ahead of $$ for once.

D
Dave Lowe
10 years ago

Stupid idea ,all about making money at the expense of peoples safety and the environment .NO!

G
Greg sezun
10 years ago

This proposal is far too close to many spots that are frequented by many users of the ocean, including swimmers, surfers, sailors, etc. There would be a significantly increased risk of shark attack. Who wants that on their conscience should this proposal go ahead? Then there are all the other matters such as the ecological effects on the environment that appear to be of concern too. This development is not appropriate for granite island or any immediate surrounds.

J
Julienne Clark
11 years ago

No aquaculture on Fleurier please!

E
Emma Foot
11 years ago

way too close to my favourite swimming and surfing spot. Don't mess with what is already a naturally beautiful spot.

A
Anthony Crowley
11 years ago

just flat out NO. This is a very ordinary submission and one of massive faults and problems.

T
Tom Handley
11 years ago

Victor Harbor has never been known for it's Tuna. I see no reason to mess with a fragile ecosystem simply to snag a few extra tourist dollars. Send them to Pt Lincoln if they want Tuna, it's also a great SA town.

B
Ben Morrison
11 years ago

We need to savour and protect our environment.

M
Michaela Quilliam
11 years ago

This proposal much not be approved for public safety. State, federal & local government has an obligation to provide a safe marine environment to protect its citizens.

J
Jane Fritsch
11 years ago

Preserve our beautiful waters.Tourists take a ride on the Big Duck boat tours if you want to see our natural marine life .Worth doing

M
Mark longhurst
11 years ago

I am concerned that such a development will cause imbalance to the marine environment and will be detrimental to an already thriving tourist industry namely surfing and other ocean related recreations. I think it would be a disaster for our region.

J
Josh Goldfinch
11 years ago

Terrible idea to have this kind of development on the victor harbor coast.

A
Anonymous
11 years ago

dont want un wanted sea life around the popular surf breaks..! it will lead to more shark attacks!

T
Tim Hoile
11 years ago

The fantastic people from KI stopped this from happening in their marine environment. They had many valid reasons as does this special area. The Conservation Council of SA have provided an excellent report highlighting the key issues including potential entanglements of marine life and other factors detrimental to the marine habitat.

K
kelly
11 years ago

Absolutely do not want this on the fleurieu!

M
Mark longhurst
11 years ago

no to the aquaculture in the ocean. Put it inland at urrimbirra or someplace.

J
Jake Tomlinson
11 years ago

It will bring unwanted sea creatures and will be a massive eye saw for victor harbor and ruin the view of our lovely bay.

C
Cass Selwood
11 years ago

This proposal is ill-conceived and will increase the risk for everyone who uses the water in and around Victor Harbor. The developer is putting their own short term financial gain ahead of the safety of the community.