Say NO to the "Swim with the Tuna" experience at Victor Harbor, say NO to aquaculture on the Fleurieu.
504 Comments
F
Frank Lloyd Smith
10 years ago
Please don't ruin the beautiful south coast and increase the risk of shark attack for future generations of swimmers and surfers in the area.
J
Jan Hill
10 years ago
There is always damage when we interfere with nature.
W
Wesley clark
10 years ago
This is all about the money it is wrong
D
Darren
10 years ago
We do NOT want this!!! STOP trying to constantly rape our environment for money and tourism.
M
Mike Eisenblatter
10 years ago
Just stop this lunacy! If NRM can invade private property without a warrant and declare environmental misconduct/non-compliance by primary producers, why aren't they involved here?
G
Georgie Inglis
10 years ago
I this goes ahead it will be a disaster for the community and environment. It must be stopped. People who want it are ignorant about the impact or they just don't care.
B
Ben Angel
10 years ago
This is a money generating idea which benefits only business. Locals and the majority of tourists will have to live with the catastrophic consequences of larger and more numerous sharks being attracted to the area.
Poor idea, terrible consequences.
B
Bob Huxtable
10 years ago
Don't know why Melbourne came up. Live on KI.
B
Bob Huxtable
10 years ago
This is the same idea that was proposed for KI a few years ago and fronted by Ms Forster. It was roundly condemned except for the member for finniss (who has never made a stand on any environmental matter), and a group from Island Beach set up a fighting fund to take the matter to court if needed. It seems that KI's good fortune is Victor's bad luck. I wish you all the luck, but, knowing what this state government is like, I won't be holding my breath.
D
Daniel mcavaney
10 years ago
Say no to tuna aquaculture
L
Leigh Gapp
10 years ago
Bad idea for people and the environment. If we are seeking increased tourism we should promote the amazing things that are already there not create a fake environment for a few to enjoy and even fewer to profit from!
R
Rob Everett
10 years ago
Leave them alone, very rare breeding grounds, I want my childrens children to know and be able to see a seahorse in their own habitat.
G
Gabrielle
10 years ago
Safe our planet :)
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
Not suitable so close to shore and recreational beaches.
J
John Meegan
10 years ago
Makes no sense. Economic & environmental & tourism & local ratepayer impact studies by actually independent bodies please.
R
Rosemary White
10 years ago
Unbelievable that a local Council has power to introduce such an environmentally detrimental concept
C
Chrissy van der Jeugd
10 years ago
Definitely no. Don't ruin another beautiful place.
M
Maureen Abais
10 years ago
The water belongs to our sea lfe , not us.
Dont disturb their environment.
We don't need this.
M
maria romeo
10 years ago
No aquaculture on thee Fleurieu Peninsula, keep this place pristine.
J
Jo-Anne Seater
10 years ago
Don't destroy the beauty of the natural environment on the Fleurier
Please don't ruin the beautiful south coast and increase the risk of shark attack for future generations of swimmers and surfers in the area.
There is always damage when we interfere with nature.
This is all about the money it is wrong
We do NOT want this!!! STOP trying to constantly rape our environment for money and tourism.
Just stop this lunacy! If NRM can invade private property without a warrant and declare environmental misconduct/non-compliance by primary producers, why aren't they involved here?
I this goes ahead it will be a disaster for the community and environment. It must be stopped. People who want it are ignorant about the impact or they just don't care.
This is a money generating idea which benefits only business. Locals and the majority of tourists will have to live with the catastrophic consequences of larger and more numerous sharks being attracted to the area. Poor idea, terrible consequences.
Don't know why Melbourne came up. Live on KI.
This is the same idea that was proposed for KI a few years ago and fronted by Ms Forster. It was roundly condemned except for the member for finniss (who has never made a stand on any environmental matter), and a group from Island Beach set up a fighting fund to take the matter to court if needed. It seems that KI's good fortune is Victor's bad luck. I wish you all the luck, but, knowing what this state government is like, I won't be holding my breath.
Say no to tuna aquaculture
Bad idea for people and the environment. If we are seeking increased tourism we should promote the amazing things that are already there not create a fake environment for a few to enjoy and even fewer to profit from!
Leave them alone, very rare breeding grounds, I want my childrens children to know and be able to see a seahorse in their own habitat.
Safe our planet :)
Not suitable so close to shore and recreational beaches.
Makes no sense. Economic & environmental & tourism & local ratepayer impact studies by actually independent bodies please.
Unbelievable that a local Council has power to introduce such an environmentally detrimental concept
Definitely no. Don't ruin another beautiful place.
The water belongs to our sea lfe , not us. Dont disturb their environment. We don't need this.
No aquaculture on thee Fleurieu Peninsula, keep this place pristine.
Don't destroy the beauty of the natural environment on the Fleurier