noise and pollution burden from Heathrow is already horrendous.
S
Susi Noble
12 years ago
Noise and pollution are unbearable for those who live in the area around Heathrow and I totally disagree with its expansion.
R
Robert Hobbs
12 years ago
I am totally opposed to ANY expansion of air travel in the South East. The constant increase in air travel is not sustainable and will assist in the severe deterioration in our environment.
F
F.W. Elms
12 years ago
Noise and pollution are a nightmare for those people living under the flight path. Expansion should not be on the agenda.
G
Gloria C Hooper
12 years ago
As well as the noise, I believe when planes come into land they dump excess fuel.
M
mary
12 years ago
noise from Heathrow impacts more people than the other major European airports put together. It is detrimental to all of our health, the cost on the environment does not justify this expansion
L
linda dixon
12 years ago
Heathrow is BIG enough!
A
Anonymous
12 years ago
It is prescient that noise from Heathrow impacts more people than the other major European airports put together. It is detrimental to all of our health and there shold be a plan for its replacement, not expanded. Its simply in the wrong place unfortunately.
A
Anonymous
12 years ago
I have lived under the Heathrow flight path for over 50 years and experienced the increase in flights and noise. The expansion of Heathrow is not the answer if you take into consideration all the economic costs that include impact on health, childrens education and the environment it does not add up.
L
Lisa Clewing
12 years ago
totally against any further enlargement of Heathrow in the current location
C
Chris Hine
12 years ago
The existing disruption to sleep from early morning and late night flights is detrimental to health. There are no medical surveys that suggest otherwise. There is a significant risk of terrorist activity causing large loss of life from a crashing plane on London. Heathrow was never intended to be a major airport and should be closed, not expanded.
A
Anonymous
12 years ago
It's time for a visionary long term solution. Heathrow expansion is just a sticking plaster and I oppose it completely.
S
sarah liddell
12 years ago
the noise is already very intrusive - i dont want it to get any worse
A
Alison Young
12 years ago
Heathrow already blights huge areas of London - no more expansion!
L
Linda Santos
12 years ago
I oppose this expansion!
J
John Jessop
12 years ago
Safety is the major factor and operating Heathrow at 98% capacity is just wrong - there is no room for error. We say the brilliance of a crash landing recently in the Hudson River and the near disaster at Heathrow when the Boeing crashed just inside the Heathrow boundary. A decision is needed now not in another 3-5 years..
C
Clare Nash
12 years ago
at present Heathrow impacts more people than all the other major European airports combined. Enough is enough!
C
Catherine Mann
12 years ago
I am against Heathrow expansion for reasons of noise, pollution and safety (incoming flights predominantly fly over most of London. The near disaster, fortunately averted, when the a plane crashed just inside the airport boundary was surely a salutary warning.
A
Anonymous
12 years ago
Whilst I understand the business need to expand LHR, it doesn't outweigh the impact to the environment and people
M
Mishka Mineyko-Colson
12 years ago
Airport in the Thames Estuary seams the most logical solution
noise and pollution burden from Heathrow is already horrendous.
Noise and pollution are unbearable for those who live in the area around Heathrow and I totally disagree with its expansion.
I am totally opposed to ANY expansion of air travel in the South East. The constant increase in air travel is not sustainable and will assist in the severe deterioration in our environment.
Noise and pollution are a nightmare for those people living under the flight path. Expansion should not be on the agenda.
As well as the noise, I believe when planes come into land they dump excess fuel.
noise from Heathrow impacts more people than the other major European airports put together. It is detrimental to all of our health, the cost on the environment does not justify this expansion
Heathrow is BIG enough!
It is prescient that noise from Heathrow impacts more people than the other major European airports put together. It is detrimental to all of our health and there shold be a plan for its replacement, not expanded. Its simply in the wrong place unfortunately.
I have lived under the Heathrow flight path for over 50 years and experienced the increase in flights and noise. The expansion of Heathrow is not the answer if you take into consideration all the economic costs that include impact on health, childrens education and the environment it does not add up.
totally against any further enlargement of Heathrow in the current location
The existing disruption to sleep from early morning and late night flights is detrimental to health. There are no medical surveys that suggest otherwise. There is a significant risk of terrorist activity causing large loss of life from a crashing plane on London. Heathrow was never intended to be a major airport and should be closed, not expanded.
It's time for a visionary long term solution. Heathrow expansion is just a sticking plaster and I oppose it completely.
the noise is already very intrusive - i dont want it to get any worse
Heathrow already blights huge areas of London - no more expansion!
I oppose this expansion!
Safety is the major factor and operating Heathrow at 98% capacity is just wrong - there is no room for error. We say the brilliance of a crash landing recently in the Hudson River and the near disaster at Heathrow when the Boeing crashed just inside the Heathrow boundary. A decision is needed now not in another 3-5 years..
at present Heathrow impacts more people than all the other major European airports combined. Enough is enough!
I am against Heathrow expansion for reasons of noise, pollution and safety (incoming flights predominantly fly over most of London. The near disaster, fortunately averted, when the a plane crashed just inside the airport boundary was surely a salutary warning.
Whilst I understand the business need to expand LHR, it doesn't outweigh the impact to the environment and people
Airport in the Thames Estuary seams the most logical solution