No expansion at Heathrow, or will this be yet another U-turn by Cameron and his effete ministers.
C
Clive Long
12 years ago
It is inappropate to allow any airport expansion in the south east and Heathrow is the worst site anyway. In order to curtail carbon emissions the Government needs to restrict aviation through taxation in favour of other forms of transportation and electronic communications.
H
Helen Saunders
12 years ago
NO,NO,NO to Heathrow expansion!
A
Anonymous
12 years ago
I am against any Heathrow Expansion, as the health risks through pollution and noise is unacceptable. Also I do not want the houses to be less attractive or reduce their value because of Twickenham being viewed as a dangerous or unhealthy area to live in. Moreover I have a young daughter and I do not want her heaalth to suffer through excessive polution.. It is a definite NO for the expansion. It is unacceptable, as we are already in a built up area with excessive traffic. More air traffic is wholly unacceptable.nd noise
A
Anonymous
12 years ago
No more runways at Heathrow!
M
Michael Trevor
12 years ago
We who live in London have the same needs as everyone else, to live without intolerable noise, polluted air and sleep deprivation. If this is inconvenient for multinationals like Heathrow Airport Holdings, formerly BAA (25% Spanish, 20% Quatari), then so be it.BAA withoutInternational money, typified by Spanish/Quatari owned BAA, doesdeserve absolute power over our lives.
D
dominic warren
12 years ago
If it did not already exist a new airport at Heathrow would be inconceivable. The massive negative impact it has on millions of permanent residents for the benefit of a few itinerants is totally unreasonable. Managed reduction of Heathrow's capacity is the right solution and provision of extra capacity elsewhere is desirable.
J
Jan Watson
12 years ago
My family + I are at breaking point suffering the constant noise + broken nights sleep. It is the wrong airport in the wrong place.
S
stephanie joy
12 years ago
The third runway at Heathrow must NOT be built. We suffer way too much noise pollution already.
A
Anna Lucas
12 years ago
Please, please don't ruin the quality of life of hundreds of thousands of West Londoners. It's touch enough living in the city already.
R
Rob Baldwin
12 years ago
It would be intolerable to have more aircraft noise over the densest part of the UK
D
Diana Viscountess Dunrossil
12 years ago
I, like thousands of others, am woken at 4.30am every day bu aeroplane noise.Though I worry more are about the health and educational impact of more planes overhead on our children.
D
DAVID POSTINS
12 years ago
The present interference with enjoyment of living in Richmond and what should be a a basic human right that of sleeping reasonably through the night is already beyond measure. Any further expansion of Heathrow must be stopped as promised by this government. The island in the Thames and the building over of Heathrow should be adopted in order to redress the blight to the whole of SW London Heathrow causes. The two infrastructure projects would also greatly boost the general economy. The government must stop listening to the business men who show no regard for the concerns of the residents or the environment. It is time for Government to show some backbone and refute the stopgap approach to decision making.
H
Holly Wilson
12 years ago
No Heathrow expansion
A
Anonymous
12 years ago
If a third of even fourth runway goes ahead, it will be a completely unacceptable breaking of the Conservative Party's word. I would never trust them again.
E
Erika Kiess
12 years ago
Just think of the horrendous impact a Heathrow expansion would have on the population around the airport .
D
diana hutchings
12 years ago
any more pollution from planes will affect asthmatics and people with chest complaints. No thanks to any more runways
N
Nigel Knight
12 years ago
Why are the government and Davies so incompetent as to be deliberately blind to the obvious advantages of the Estuary airport and so corrupts to be paid to say the endless expansion at Heathrow is a good idea. Why do we have to suffer highly paid corrupt people like Davies telling Osborne what he wants to hear. They are so full of self interest, the country would be better off in anarchy.
L
Lyn Willingham
12 years ago
Expansion would be a disaster for the local community.
S
Shashi Watson
12 years ago
There must be a better option to the east of London
No expansion at Heathrow, or will this be yet another U-turn by Cameron and his effete ministers.
It is inappropate to allow any airport expansion in the south east and Heathrow is the worst site anyway. In order to curtail carbon emissions the Government needs to restrict aviation through taxation in favour of other forms of transportation and electronic communications.
NO,NO,NO to Heathrow expansion!
I am against any Heathrow Expansion, as the health risks through pollution and noise is unacceptable. Also I do not want the houses to be less attractive or reduce their value because of Twickenham being viewed as a dangerous or unhealthy area to live in. Moreover I have a young daughter and I do not want her heaalth to suffer through excessive polution.. It is a definite NO for the expansion. It is unacceptable, as we are already in a built up area with excessive traffic. More air traffic is wholly unacceptable.nd noise
No more runways at Heathrow!
We who live in London have the same needs as everyone else, to live without intolerable noise, polluted air and sleep deprivation. If this is inconvenient for multinationals like Heathrow Airport Holdings, formerly BAA (25% Spanish, 20% Quatari), then so be it.BAA withoutInternational money, typified by Spanish/Quatari owned BAA, doesdeserve absolute power over our lives.
If it did not already exist a new airport at Heathrow would be inconceivable. The massive negative impact it has on millions of permanent residents for the benefit of a few itinerants is totally unreasonable. Managed reduction of Heathrow's capacity is the right solution and provision of extra capacity elsewhere is desirable.
My family + I are at breaking point suffering the constant noise + broken nights sleep. It is the wrong airport in the wrong place.
The third runway at Heathrow must NOT be built. We suffer way too much noise pollution already.
Please, please don't ruin the quality of life of hundreds of thousands of West Londoners. It's touch enough living in the city already.
It would be intolerable to have more aircraft noise over the densest part of the UK
I, like thousands of others, am woken at 4.30am every day bu aeroplane noise.Though I worry more are about the health and educational impact of more planes overhead on our children.
The present interference with enjoyment of living in Richmond and what should be a a basic human right that of sleeping reasonably through the night is already beyond measure. Any further expansion of Heathrow must be stopped as promised by this government. The island in the Thames and the building over of Heathrow should be adopted in order to redress the blight to the whole of SW London Heathrow causes. The two infrastructure projects would also greatly boost the general economy. The government must stop listening to the business men who show no regard for the concerns of the residents or the environment. It is time for Government to show some backbone and refute the stopgap approach to decision making.
No Heathrow expansion
If a third of even fourth runway goes ahead, it will be a completely unacceptable breaking of the Conservative Party's word. I would never trust them again.
Just think of the horrendous impact a Heathrow expansion would have on the population around the airport .
any more pollution from planes will affect asthmatics and people with chest complaints. No thanks to any more runways
Why are the government and Davies so incompetent as to be deliberately blind to the obvious advantages of the Estuary airport and so corrupts to be paid to say the endless expansion at Heathrow is a good idea. Why do we have to suffer highly paid corrupt people like Davies telling Osborne what he wants to hear. They are so full of self interest, the country would be better off in anarchy.
Expansion would be a disaster for the local community.
There must be a better option to the east of London